Friday, September 01, 2006

Regime Change In Belgium Is The Official Policy Of Infidel Bloggers Alliance


Infidel Bloggers Alliance - the insane clown posse - is comin' to get ya'.

Belgium will be the first Western government to fall as a result of the Great European Civil War. It is an inevitability. However, the sooner the better, so Infidel Bloggers Alliance has decided to pursue a policy of agitating for regime change in Belgium.

Of course, we have no organized armed forces at this point, so there is no threat of armed intervention. However, we want to make it clear that we support our Belgian brothers and sisters in their pursuit of freedom and human rights.

As such, we will be bringing you the news of the outlandish behavior of the Belgian government. Over the course of time, we expect these stories to build upon one another so that they will eventually constitute an overwhelming case for the removal of the current system of administration within Belgium.

We must all recognize that the Belgian government would not behave in the way it does were it not for the fact that it knows that it is incredibly weak. A strong government would not pick on a blogger like Paul Belien for pointing out its mistakes. They say he is inciting racial hatred, when in fact what he is doing is pointing out the dangers of Islamofascism. Only an exhausted regime, unsure of its own hold on the reins of power, would take such action.

Therefore, while it may take time to bring about the change that we seek, we can rest assured it will come.


Lock up your cute furry animals - there's going to be trouble.

Witness now, the latest information to come to our attention:


Belgian Authorities Destroy Holocaust Records

The Belgian authorities have destroyed archives and records relating to the persecution and deportation of Jews in Belgium in the 1930s and 1940s. Some of this happened as recently as the late 1990s. [...]

... the Belgian press has not yet mentioned the affair. The Senate report says that “documents about the period 1930-1950 have been destroyed on a massive scale.”

The systematic destructions of the records of police and judiciary from the 1930s and ’40s happened chiefly in Brussels and Wallonia, the French-speaking south of Belgium. The Senate report states that in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking north of the country, archives have been saved thanks to conscientious archivists.


I repeat, only a weak government, unsure of its own hold on the reins of power would do such a thing. A strong, moral government would desire to preserve its history knowing that mistakes are to be learned from, that the self-correcting process of democracy would prevail, and that only by admitting its errors can this process continue working.

The fact that the Belgian government instead fears its own history is evidence that they have no intention of correcting the errors of the past, let alone subjecting these errors to the self-correcting process of a democratic system.

It will probably be a long, turbulent ride forward into the future, but rest assured, we the people will prevail.

Belgium - Let me give you some advice, you don't want to mess with us when we're wearing our party hats!

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Belgian government is indeed weak and wobbly. Not only does it have the Muslims to contend with, but there is also growing unrest within the Dutch-speaking population http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5305484.stm

Pastorius said...

It's interesting how when the government runs out of ideas, the people revert to tribalism, which is what is happening in the story your link took me to.

Thanks for that.

Anonymous said...

Hi Pastorius; I can agree with most of your post except for the fact that the whole Belien case is no big deal at all over here; I think he's a mythomaniac and paranoid at that, but I'd be very surprised if anybody in the Belgian government had ever even heard of him. And there's been a lot of talk on English speaking sites about one of the texts he wrote, allegedly inciting racial hatred; here's a translated excerpt:
"The predators have knives. From when they were children they have learned to slaughter warm-blooded prey during the annual "Sacrifice Feast" (Eid ul-Adha).
When suicide bombers strike in Israel, the Israelis attack their parents. With bulldozers they raze the houses of their families. Maybe that’s where our “indifference” lies: that we leave the parents of these juvenile, murdering criminals alone; that we let them continue enjoying our social security; that we don’t destroy their houses and deport them as punishment for the criminal offspring they planted amongst us."
decide for yourself (oh yeah, the text was written in an immediate emotional outburst after the murder of a belgian teenager by two youths apparently of North African decent (yes, you guessed it: they had dark hair!); they turned out to be Poles.

Pastorius said...

Sanulot,
One of the reason the Israeli government deals with the families of suicide bombers the way it does is because they are financially rewarded for their child's "martyrdom". The Palestinian government would give $5,000, and Saddam Hussein used to kick in $10,000. So, the razing of a house was a disincentive. A wise policy, in my opinion.

I don't know whether Belgium ought to adopt any similar policies holding the parents of delinquents responsible for their childrens behavior. You would know better than I. You know the extent of the problem because you live there. I do know that the murder rate in Belgium is almost twice that of the United States. I'm telling you, that's pretty damn bad. It does seem like you guys have a really bad problem on your hands.

By the way, do you think Belien deserves what he is getting from the Belgian government? If so, can you tell me why? I may be ignorant. I know Belien from his writing, which seem temperate to me.

Anonymous said...

Hi Pastorius,

I'm not concerned about that specific Israeli policy; my main point was to convince you that Belien is just a mythomaniac; concerning the murder rate, the figure oft quoted (among others by the WSJ), originated with Beliën and makes no sense whatsoever in that it combines murders and attempted murders; the actual figure is probably closer to 2, and thus less than half the US figure; Beliën has known this for weeks and for reasons known but to him declines to set it straight; I don't see why, a low murder rate doesn't mean much; most repressive regimes actually have very low murder rates;
my point is: don't believe everything Belien says; his main goal is self promotion; he's getting nothing at all from the Belgian government as far as I know; all children up to age 18 are obliged to go to school, and if you choose to home teach, then that will be checked from time to time. For Belien this is of course one big conspiracy against him! he wishes! after the murder rate debacle there's absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe him. Where I am in full agreement with him however is his view concerning the enforcement of Belgian anti-racism laws, which, as you can imagine, is an almost impossible exercise in trying to distinguish between truly racist defamation and politically incorrect free speech... But here too it's all about Beliën portraying himself as the big victim of this law, which has left him alone for years until he finally wrote the above piece and got what he wanted: a policeman at his door asking him if, when he had time, he could drop down the station to make a declaration. This is not good, obviously, even if he was asking, nay begging, for it and for Belien this is prime evidence that we live in a police state; but believe me, a police state would have 50 VDC running through his testicles as we speak...
kind regards and keep up the savvy comments!

Pastorius said...

Sankulot,

Wow, that's interesting. So, it looks like I'm making a mistake here, huh?

How do I get my hands on verification of what you say? If what you say is true, I must write about it and make a public correction of what I have written here.

Demosthenes said...

I'd like to say that which is forbidden, the greatest blasphemy of the social consensus. Before I do I want to say that prefer democratic resolution of issues confronting our society. However, neither the Universe nor human history (nor for that matter the Christian and Jewish religions) guarantee that every issue can be resolved peaceably. We may get ourselves into situations in which the only solution is to fight. Europe is now in such a situation--a situation that would have been entirely avoidable if they had thought about morality as people producing the best arguments for a political course, instead of being fundamentalists of the Church of Human Rights. Yes the Church of Human Rights is certainly right that Hitler was a horrible man, but the Church someway ignores Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Paul Pot and many other communist leaders were as evil as Hitler. Yes, the Church of Human Rights is right that the Europeans shouldn't have had pograms against the Jews in the middle ages. But the Church of Human Rights is wrong to never consider the question of what if Jews really went around poisoning wells and killing Christian children to use their blood to make matzos? The Christian would have been right to kill the Jews, then. It is not wrong to kill off groups that behave barbarically.

What is a gay European boy of age twenty to think now? By the time he reaches middle age, his country may well be muslim and his government may want to stone him to death. Why shouldn't he fight like a man now, rather been lead away to death like a sheep in his middle age? Or why shouldn't an European girl decide she would rather kill than being made a second class citizen under Sharia? Why should a young Christian permit his religious heritage to be thrown away for the sake of political correctness? If Christianity is the truth, shouldn't it be worth fighting for it against the followers of a murderous cult? The Europeans now have the choice of preserving Europe or committing suicide. If they want to keep Europe, they are going to have to fight a European Civil War including the deliberate killing of muslims simply for being muslim.