Transcript here
Barack said:
Don't blame me for what Wright says.
Wright does really know Jesus.
I disagree with him on this, but remain by his side as a pastor.
You would too since your, rabbi, priest, pastor says the kind of thing YOU disagree with
It's about race.
But Barack Obama's real feelings for America certainly must be reflected in his wife. We're downright mean, and she's ashamed of us, except for our support of her black husband. This parallels Wright
But Barack Obama's feelings for our 'stalwart ally', Israel, certainly must be reflected by his appointment of advisers on the middle east and foreign affairs.
Powers
Rice
Brezhinski
Malley
See American Thinker
My rabbi would be ANSWERING TO ME if she EVER said anything like Wright TYPICALLY espoused, and I'd walk out if I was present. Persistence guarantees my permanent absence and PUBLIC denunciation, and I have no public persona
It's not about race except as you try to make it, to CAUSE white guilt.
Obama NEVER mentions AIDS or Hiroshima, arguably the most inflammatory and signifying of Wright's comments.
As far as his unequivocal condemnation, neither previous statements such as not wanting to be 'associated' with Wright's opinions, nor this statement today are ringing statements of disgust. In fact, Obama defends Wright as a person, and as a pastor.
Manifest disgust
Barack said:
Don't blame me for what Wright says.
Wright does really know Jesus.
I disagree with him on this, but remain by his side as a pastor.
You would too since your, rabbi, priest, pastor says the kind of thing YOU disagree with
It's about race.
But Barack Obama's real feelings for America certainly must be reflected in his wife. We're downright mean, and she's ashamed of us, except for our support of her black husband. This parallels Wright
But Barack Obama's feelings for our 'stalwart ally', Israel, certainly must be reflected by his appointment of advisers on the middle east and foreign affairs.
Powers
Rice
Brezhinski
Malley
See American Thinker
My rabbi would be ANSWERING TO ME if she EVER said anything like Wright TYPICALLY espoused, and I'd walk out if I was present. Persistence guarantees my permanent absence and PUBLIC denunciation, and I have no public persona
It's not about race except as you try to make it, to CAUSE white guilt.
Obama NEVER mentions AIDS or Hiroshima, arguably the most inflammatory and signifying of Wright's comments.
As far as his unequivocal condemnation, neither previous statements such as not wanting to be 'associated' with Wright's opinions, nor this statement today are ringing statements of disgust. In fact, Obama defends Wright as a person, and as a pastor.
Manifest disgust
6 comments:
Barak Obama said today,"Change!! Chaange...Chaaaaaaaaange!!!...Change everything but my loyalty to my hateful pastor...and if you don't like it - up yours, I'd rather change YOU"
Can anybody spare some change?
Pastorius, I think you've just came up with anti-Obama slogan: Spare us the change!
Good.
Here's another:
Obama for President: Because he says he'll bomb Pakistan.
The common sense conclusion given the evidence is that Obama is a man obsessed with race. He holds white people suspect just because they are white and believes that all whites are racists. As president he would aim to make me and my family second-class citiziens just for being white because he blames us for what people who were not our ancestors did 200 years ago to people who were not his ancestors either but happened to have similar skin color. He appears incapable of judging persons as individuals apart from race. He sees this nation as the embodiment of white aggression. He sits there and nods when his fascist preacher calls us the USKKKA and shouts "God damn America". When cornered, he makes excuses for him.
His plan for Hope and Change for America consists of wreaking racial vengeance by cutting it to pieces and distributing it to "people of color" throughout the world. Only then can America be made to atone. He has introducted legislation to allow the wealth of Americans to be further confiscated and diverted into Third World Countries. We have no reason whatever to expect that he will defend Americans against aggression by Islamist "people of color" because he doesn't consider America worth saving unless it has been transformed into a Black Liberation Theology socialist state.
These may seem like extreme charges, but he has given me no reason to think otherwise unless you count idle, contradictory, and evasive talk, and I don't.
The only question I can see is whether it is better for him to be nominated and drag this unseemly farce out to November, by which time he will be so despised by every American voter with basic common sense, regardly of race, class or whatever that McCain will thoroughly clean his clock, or hope that sanity will prevail earlier and take our chances with Hillary. My personal belief is that it is always better to run against a corrupt politician than an equally corrupt messianic delusionoid. The gender issue with Hillary is no where near as incendiary as the race card Obama has been playing.
However, the change may be made for us. He still has the delegates. Some of the extreme Leftoids amongst his followers are talking of disrupting the Convention to prevent Clinton from obtaining the nomination. However it goes, it will not be pretty.
I think I've slipped into rambling incoherent prose at this point, the result of having been beaten around the brain by that destestable little race-obsessed sock puppet for the last week, so I am going to call it a night. Last act of the evening will be to order an "I Believe in Separation of Church and Hate" anti-Obama bumpersticker from fredstates.com.
Did anyone else notice that in Obama’s choice of words, describing the nation and its founding document as unfinished and imperfect, he hints to a possible future agenda of “judicial activism” or “legislating from the bench” (for any SCOTUS appointees). I would venture - and I admit that this assumption needs research - that Obama believes that the U.S. Constitution is a “living document” that needs to be interpreted in light of current times and mores, irrespective of the intentions of those who actually wrote it. I would have to disagree – one of the reasons I support the Constructionist (and obscure) Alan Keyes.
Also, note that the candidate who didn't want the contest to be about race “set forth AT THE BEGINNING” to continue the struggle of oppressed African-Americans…meaning that the race issue was his impetus for running at all.
Post a Comment