Wednesday, April 09, 2008

UN: killing slowly the freedom of speech

In the path towards censorship of which Islam profits, we have now that the special rapporteur on freedom of speech from UN Council for Human Rights will, according to the new UNCHR resolucion:
report on instances in which the abuse of the right of freedom of expression constitutes an act of racial or religious discrimination.
The amended resolution was adopted on 28 March in Geneva by 32 votes in favour, mainly Islamic states, with support from China, Cuba and Russia. There were no votes against, but 15 abstentions.
The measure was proposed by paragons of freedom Egypt and Pakistan.

4 comments:

Pastorius said...

And, the free countries of the world are members of this international forum for what reason?

Unknown said...

Errr, well, are you really asking this seriously or just joking about it? XDDDD

I honestly don't know. We have had the UN resolution against the defamation of Islam (because other religions are not mentioned), the OIC resolution asking UN to pass another resolution to sue anyone who critisize Islam and the UNCHR stopped when critisizing Sharia Law regarding Human Rights "because discussing Sharia in this forum just insults our religion".

In this case, it has been worse as European democracies only "abstained" themselves, instead of voting NO.

What enrages me most, is that NO ONE of these resolutions or statements have been published AT ALL in Spain. It's disgusting the MSM control over anything which regards UN.

So, yes, it's about time any country which defends HR just hurries to get out of UN et al...

Epaminondas said...

I keep saying it...
COLLECT THE PARKING FINES,
AND SEND THEM ON THEIR WAY

The UN is not what was envisioned in 1945.
We do NOT belong in the UN.
It is a TOOL.
And the ironic part is that this is really NOT an extreme view, it the UN which has become extreme

Unknown said...

The UN is not what was envisioned in 1945.

Certainly NOT, Epaminondas... But how much will it take for normal people to consider this as a fact and not as a mere possibility?