Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Charles Schumer is the enemy of free speech

Schumer on Fox: Fairness Doctrine 'fair and balanced'
By Bob Cusack
Posted: 11/04/08 11:30 AM [ET]

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday defended the so-called Fairness Doctrine in an interview on Fox News, saying, "I think we should all be fair and balanced, don't you?"

Schumer's comments echo other Democrats' views on reviving the Fairness Doctrine, which would require radio stations to balance conservative hosts with liberal ones.

Asked if he is a supporter of telling radio stations what content they should have, Schumer used the fair and balanced line, claiming that critics of the Fairness Doctrine are being inconsistent.

"The very same people who don't want the Fairness Doctrine want the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to limit pornography on the air. I am for that... But you can't say government hands off in one area to a commercial enterprise but you are allowed to intervene in another. That's not consistent."
Never mind the incredible reasoning..we are getting you loud and clear
Time for offshore, and satellite braodcasting...and offshore server farms.
You want to have equal response?
START YOUR OWN RADIO SHOW OR BLOG AND ANSWER BACK.
If the market responds, they have voted your response as being valuable.

Everyone who voted for Obama and the dems today.... YOU HAVE A HAND IN THIS.
THE END OF BROADCAST TALK RADIO.

In 2007, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a close ally of Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told The Hill, "It's time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they're in a better position to make a decision."

Senate Rules Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) last year said, "I believe very strongly that the airwaves are public and people use these airwaves for profit. But there is a responsibility to see that both sides and not just one side of the big public questions of debate of the day are aired and are aired with some modicum of fairness."

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would cut into profits so significantly that radio executives would opt to scale back on conservative radio programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from the FCC.

They also note that conservative radio shows has been far more successful than liberal ones.

In his Fox interview, Schumer, who heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, also weighed in on the election, predicting that Democrats will end up with between 56 and 58 seats in the Senate.

He also defended "card check" legislation, claiming there is a strong need to allow workers a private ballot to register their votes on whether to organize a union.
Schumer said "there has to be some counter" to the leverage businesses have, claiming "employers have every leg up on people who want to organize and that's why union workers have gone down from about 25 percent to 6 percent [in the private sector]."

Business groups adamantly oppose the card check bill, which passed the House and fell short of the necessary votes to overcome a filibuster in the Senate.

Charles Schumer:

Enemy of Free Speech, enemy of secret ballot, whore for union money and contributions, unfit to be senator.

The divides in this nation are going to be historic.

Irretrievable.

6 comments:

Mother Effingby said...

I don't see this happening for several reasons: First, it would immediately be challenged in court, and regardless of how liberal the court is, I don't think it would stand...I could be wrong, but there are other reasons. If it were to stand, then it would have to be applied to every kind of media, and wouldn't end with just talk radio, but have to include cable television, the internet, and everywhere there is opinion.

Epaminondas said...

Jewel you better take a look back at 1949 to 1983.

Never mind that every leading dem is in favor of this (and I mean EVERY), in fact there is much thought this can be done simply by replacing FCC commissioners this could be done by vote of the FCC.

Cable is PAID for and would probably be exempted. And I'm not sure that the feds could do a damn thing about satellite broadcasts.

Blogs might be in a lot of trouble. At what number of clicks/day are you large enough to require the other side to be presented?

Back then (I am 57) that's the way it was ..TV, radio, and across the breadth of media.

WC said...

So... to be fair, the NYT will give me a column a week to state my side of the isseues?

Wonderful. Can't wait. I'm sending in my resume today!

Anonymous said...

If there's money to be made radio stations will air liberal shows. The left tried talk radio already. It failed. No one listened. Radio wasn't "hi-tech" enough for typical impatient, instant gratification democrats. You mean we have to listen for hours???

The way I see it, talk radio helps balance the HUGE imbalance of TV and print media.

Here's another thought...How about some "fairness" in our schools, especially higher education. College students are taught by professors that are likely 90% liberal in their views and who's opinions certainly make their way into the curriculum. So in all "fairness" we need to fire 40% of college professors. I'm sure that will go over well.

Epaminondas said...

UH...actually you can see the outline of that with complete morons like Pat Buchanan on MSNBC to put on display that conservatives are actually racists.

What a complete farce

Mother Effingby said...

What I am saying is that this will be fought if it comes up. People won't accept this. Unless they do, of course.