"Regime Change
Will Be
Necessary”
click.jpg

Saturday, November 08, 2008

Obama Ordered By Scotus to Produce Birth Certificate?

From what I can tell this story is not true. However, Pamela put it up at her site, so maybe she knows more than I. Or, perhaps she jumped the gun.

From Atlas Shrugs:


SCOTUS SOUTER 

TELLS OBAMA 

TO PRODUCE 

BIRTH CERTIFICATE 

DECEMBER 1

This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.


Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box?  Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that  disqualifies Obama from the office of the President.  What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.

Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.

The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas

If The Supreme Court Decides…?


At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.


If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.


"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."

Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link#

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Polarik created an interesting morph of Malcom X and the anointed one.

Quote: "If Barack Hussein Obama II is Malcolm X's biological son and ideological heir, it would uniquely explain the mystery of why he was so generously helped by so many Arab and communist "friends in high places" long before he was a "somebody."

More at israelinsider

Saturday, November 08, 2008 10:59:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

PDF of Attorney Philip Berg's press release

Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:10:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Newsweek editor: Obama cult 'creepy' via Rush radio 11/7

Mwahahahahaha

Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:15:00 am  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

Rome 120 BC
Every oscillation back and forth between the Senate and the people increases in amplitude ... Gracchi, Marius, Sulla, Saturninus, Cinna,...

It's hard for me to imagine that Obama does not have a perfect birth certificate, but if he does not, ugly is not word which will describe what follows.

Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:26:00 am  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

Hey, I can't find anything FROM THE COURT to back this up.

A search of any combination of key words yields nothing

Nothing at Scotus site

Nothing at Volokh

Where'd Pam get the story?
It looks like she quoting a blog which quotes a blog.

I don't feel any meat between my teeth on this yet...not saying it's not right, but I'd like to see more ...wouldn't this rate one of Drudge's spinning police lights?

Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:37:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are correct Epa . . .no-one seems to have any proof of this. That's why I posted the PDF link . . .the 'source' = Berg's press release.

Berg should know better, but then again, this IS Berg we are talking about.

If the Supreme Court will not stand up for the Constitution, then who will? What good is a Constitutional directive, if there is no body of law to enforce it, no standing to challenge it, and no political party to make eligibility a matter of proof?

Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:12:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

Epa,

Note the first words in my post are

"From what I can tell, this story is not true."

Saturday, November 08, 2008 4:14:00 pm  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

Ya I saw....I still have seen nothing else out there

Saturday, November 08, 2008 4:36:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

Phillip Berg is the P.T. Barnum of lawyers.

Saturday, November 08, 2008 4:44:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home