Monday, December 08, 2008

They Said It, Not Us - If You Still Needed More Evidence That Many Muslims Are Part Of An Invading Army

Understanding The Philosophy Of Muslim Violence



MPACUK, unlike the many other Muslim groups out there, have not just pioneered the best solution against any terrorist attack in mainland Britain (i.e. get the mosques and ISOCs to teach democracy) but has now embarked in cutting through the media propaganda to reach British Muslims, and hopefully non-Muslims, and informing them of the true nature of Muslim violence.

We know it will get us in trouble with the media; make us targets for the government elites who want to hide this from you. We are prepared to pay the price. Most Muslim groups in the UK are still silent, or worse apologising, so they can get the 'moderate' medal of dishonour from their masters. We prefer the truth - no matter what they call us. 

We realised that until the public understand why many in the Muslim world are reacting so violently to them, they will neither know the cause of the deaths of so many innocents on both sides or know how to solve it. We simply no longer feel that the most vocal parties who claim to be countering terrorism are sincere to the very cause they talk of. 

We will no longer be part of the deliberate attempt to keep the public confused on the issue of terrorism. We will not be part of the apologetic Muslim leaders who blame their own community for terrorism. We will not condemn, nor allow ourselves to be condemned by governing elites who are more interested in a political stunt than saving lives. No more politics and propaganda when it comes terrorism - its the truth and nothing else.


And, they illustrate their support of violence, with the video below.







Now, Islam is not a race, it is an ideology. That being said, it is true that most Muslims in the UK are either Middle Eastern, Asian, or black, and therefore, not white.

Is the MPACUK trying, against all reason, to turn this into a race war anyway?

That's what it looks like to me.

If whites take the bait, and phrase their opposition in terms of race, then the MPACUK will use that as a wedge between Anti-Jihadists and ignorant dhimmis.

This could be disaster, and it could be the shape of the future battle against Islamofascism.

8 comments:

midnight rider said...

It's no race war, it's a religious war. Idealogical if you'd rather. They started it 1430 years ago. Now it's a fight to the end. No quarter. It will either be a global caliphate or Islam will cease to exist. And those are the rules THEY set down, not us.

Our leaders better stand up and say so soon.

Pastorius said...

Yep, and they are the ones trying to turn it into a race war.

Epaminondas said...

What a stupid pant load of gobbledygook!

Stokely ?

I thought he was still looking for a pair of 'Cleavers'

Anonymous said...

Our only hope of winning this war without destruction and carnage along the lines of WWII is that enough people in the West will change their mental model of the "Religion of Peace" to reflect the reality of Islamism and Jihad and take action before it is too late for anything but war. Instead they get bombarded with disinformation crapola like this.

I've got a couple book recommendations -- "Deep Survival" and "Everyday Survival" by Laurence Gonzales. Gonzales uses a multitude of enthralling accounts of real-life misadventures to illustrate how our mental scripts and models can interfere with our ability to sense and deal with dangerous situations. "Everyday Survival" is perversely entertaining because, after his usual brilliant introductory examples of how someone's mental mindset can cloud his comprehension of what is going on in the real world, Gonzales proceeds to illustrate the phenomenon. With himself. His politics obviously list to port and in applying his theories to political/military models he falls right into his own trap. There is no mention of Jihad or Islamism, but Abu Ghraib gets a nod as an example of "torture". On the whole, however, Gonzales maintains his rational perspective and common sense, and his explanations of why people don't recognize danger until it literally crashes down on them (e.g., Mt. St. Helens and the 2004 tsunami) are valuable in understanding the persistent Islam-shaped blind spot of so many Westerners. I will try to do a post on this when I've finished the second book though it may not be until after Christmas because the bookstore is already a zoo and it's only the 7th of December.

midnight rider said...

Revere you're an optimist compared to me. I think the war is on us and there is no turning beck because Islam will never change or capitulate. Only win or die. The carnage will come on one side or the other. But what I see is the carnage will be on us if people don't wake up and it will be on Islam if they do. Either way it will make WWII look like a sandlot fight.

Pretty grim on my part I grant you. But I ain't got much Christmas spirit yet, either.

Pastorius said...

RRA,
I look forward to that post. In many ways I am glad the left are going to be taking over now. It is better that they drop their insane anti-Americanism and be forced to take up the mantle.

People like Gonzalez can help.

Anonymous said...

Who cares what kind of war it is as long as it starts. The sooner, the better.

midnight rider said...

Dog of war -- it's already well started. We just haven't gotten serious about it. Which is my/our whole point. The sons of allah (read:sons a bitches) are certainly trying.