The 1791 Tax
The new Federal government, at the urging of the first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, assumed the states' debt from the American Revolutionary War. In 1791 Hamilton convinced Congress to approve taxes on distilled spirits and carriages. Hamilton's principal reason for the tax was that he wanted to pay down the national debt, but he justified the tax "more as a measure of social discipline than as a source of revenue."[1] But most importantly, Hamilton "wanted the tax imposed to advance and secure the power of the new federal government." [2]
Congress designed the tax so smaller distillers would pay by the gallon, while larger distillers (who could produce in volume) could take advantage of a flat fee. The net result was to affect smaller producers more than larger ones. George Washington, the president at the time, was one such large producer of whiskey. Large producers were assessed a tax of 6 cents per gallon, while small producers were taxed at 9 cents per gallon. [1] But Western settlers were short of cash to begin with and, being far from their markets and lacking good roads, lacked any practical means to get their grain to market other than fermenting and distilling it into relatively portable distilled spirits. Additionally, whiskey was often used among western farmers as
a medium of exchange or as a barter good.
The tax on whiskey was bitterly and fiercely opposed among the Cohere on the frontier from the day it was passed. Western farmers considered it to be both unfair and discriminatory, since they had traditionally converted their excess grain into
liquor. Since the nature of the tax affected those who produced the whiskey but
not the people who bought the whiskey, it directly affected many farmers. Many protest meetings were held, and a situation arose which was reminiscent of the
opposition to the Stamp Act of 1765 before the American Revolution.
From Pennsylvania to Georgia, the western counties engaged in a campaign of harassment of the federal tax collectors. "Whiskey Boys" also made violent protests in Maryland, Virginia, and North, and South Carolina.[3]
The Insurrection
By the summer of 1794, tensions reached a fevered pitch all along the western frontier as the settlers' primary marketable commodity was threatened by the federal taxation measures. Finally, the civil protests became an armed rebellion. The first shots were fired at the Oliver Miller Homestead in present day South Park Township, Pennsylvania, about ten miles south of Pittsburgh. As word of the
rebellion spread across the frontier, a whole series of loosely organized resistance measures were taken, including robbing the mail, stopping court proceedings, and the threat of an assault on Pittsburgh. One group, disguised as women, assaulted a tax collector, cropped his hair, coated him with tar and feathers, and stole his horse.George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, remembering Shays' Rebellion from
just eight years before, decided to make Pennsylvania a testing ground for federal authority. Washington ordered federal marshals to serve court orders requiring the tax protesters to appear in federal district court. On August 7, 1794, Washington invoked martial law to summon the militias of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and several other states. The rebel force they fought was likewise composed of Pennsylvanians, Virginians, and possibly men from other states.[4]
The militia force of 12,950 men was organized, roughly the size of the entire army in the Revolutionary War. Under the personal command of Washington, Hamilton, and Revolutionary War hero General Henry "Lighthorse Harry" Lee, the army assembled in Harrisburg and marched to Bedford, Pennsylvania the site of Washington's headquarters, then on to western Pennsylvania (to what is now Monongahela) in October of 1794. The rebels "could never be found," according to Jefferson, but the militia expended considerable effort rounding up 20 prisoners, clearly demonstrating Federalist authority in the national government. The men were imprisoned, where one died, while two, including Philip Vigol (later spelled Philip Wigal), were convicted of treason and sentenced to death by hanging. Washington, however, pardoned them on the grounds that one was a "simpleton," and the other, "insane."[5]
Only two were actually arrested and jailed: judge Robert Philson and devout Quaker Herman Husband. Philson was released by Washington, but Husband died in jail before he could be released.
By November, some individuals were fined and charged with "assisting and abetting in setting up a seditious pole in opposition to the laws of the United States," and in January 1796 the following were fined five to fifteen shillings each: Nicholas Kobe, Adam Bower, Abraham Cable Jr, Dr. John Kimmell, Henry Foist, Jacob Holy, Adam Holy, Michael Chintz, George Swart, and Adam Stahl of Brothers Valley township; John Heminger, John Armstrong, George Weimer, George Tedrow, Abraham Miller, John Miller Jr, Benjamin Brown, and Peter Bower of Milford township; Emanuel Brallier, and George Ankeny, of Quemahoning township; Peter Augustine, James Conner, Henry Everly, Daniel McCartey, William Pinkerton, and Jonathan Woodsides of Turkeyfoot township.[6]
Tom the Tinker
"Tom the Tinker" assumed the leadership of the Whiskey Rebellion in the early 1790s. He came about after it was decided that to merely attack tax collectors or those who rented offices and lodging to tax collectors wasn't enough; pressure needed to be applied to those who had registered their stills and were paying the tax. In essence, Tom the Tinker illuminated the point that compliance with the law was as contemptible an action as collecting the whiskey tax. William Hogeland has described the situation thus:
You might find a note posted on a tree outside your house, requiring you to publish in the Gazette your hatred of the whiskey tax and your commitment to the cause; otherwise, the note promised, your still would be mended. Tom had a wicked sense of humor and a literary bent: "mended" meant shot full of holes or burned. Tom published on his own too, rousing his followers to action, telling the Gazette's editor in cover notes to run the messages or suffer the consequences.[7]
Groups formed calling themselves Tom the Tinker's Men. They assured Tom the
Tinker's threats were carried out. Some believe John Holcroft, a leading member of the Mingo Creek Association and veteran of Shays' Rebellion[8], was Tom the Tinker, or perhaps the author of the letters attributed to Tom, but this has never been proven. It is not known whether Tom was an actual individual or a character created by the leading members of the Whiskey Rebellion to serve as their leader, much like Ned Ludd's role as leader of the Luddites. Hogeland takes issue with the notion that "Tom the Tinker" was a pseudonym or nom de guerre for one of the other participants in the rebellion, saying, "Tom wasn't an alias for a person. He was the stark fact that loyal opposition to the resistance was disallowed. Tom was Mingo Creek personified."[8]
All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
About What Pastorius Said. . .
(does this make Pasto the new Tom the Tinker?)
Straight from Wikipedia:
The Whiskey Rebellion:
I'm a lifelong resident of Pennsylvania. My Germanic and Dutch ancestors I can trace in a straight line name by name back to their New World arrival in New Amsterdam 1664. I have a period drawing of their first house. One great grandfather signed the petition that erected our County. Another great grandfather was with Washington at Valley Forge and functioned as a spy in Philadelphia that winter.
I'LL BE GODDAMNED IF I'M GOING TO LET OBAMA DESTROY THIS COUNTRY.
Of course, even further back, they had a different way of dealng with wayward politicians. . .
D.C. ought to consider themselves lucky we Americans are a much more reasonable bunch. Of course, should they move to outlaw the sale of tar or feathers. . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Great post-mind if I swipe it?-I'll post it tomorrow--and to think I was going to take a 'rest' from all of this...
Sad that a man of honor like Washington 'slipped' when it came to his own interests-
The account on Hamilton does not surprise me...
C-CS
CS -- Swipe Away! Always and anytime.
I tried to take a break this weekend,too. Lots of travel and family stuff but I just couldn't help myself.
Well, I'm certainly not Tom the Tinker. I'm just a guy who writes words on the internet.
I will say this, my children will not serve in Obama's National Service, if I have any say in it. It's obviously up to them, ultimately, but if I can talk them out of it, I will.
And also, you know the Second Amendment says, we have the right to keep and BEAR arms.
I think perhaps we should start of Civil Disobedience movement where we all wear our guns on our hips like in the Wild West.
I saw some Armenian men walking around like that the other day. I don't know how these men would have gotten Carry Permits. They were not cops, as far as I could tell. They looked like gangsters, frankly.
But, there they were walking down Glendale Blvd with guns proudly displayed.
AS THEY SHOULD BE.
It's our right. It says so in our Constitution.
Well, in Pennsylvania there is no restriciton on Open Carry. Perfectly legal do not need a license except in Philly. Now, as soon as you get in the car in Pa. that's concealed and you need the license. Thus I have such a license.
Last year about this time a group in Pa. who meets regularly at a restaurant and exercises that open carry right ran in to some trouble when a patron thought they were doing something illegal. Cops came, one detained not because it was illegal but because the cops themselves are not always familiar with the law and he refused to provide a driver's license since he had done nothing wrong.
Now the Open Carry group is suing Dickson City over the incident and it is moving along about as quick as any court litigation case.
Another Open Carry situation arose here late summer early fall where a fellow showed up at an Obama rally open carrying. He was arrested, Not for the Open Carry which was legal but the best they could charge him with was creating a public disturbance. A misdemeanor.
I'm a huge advocate for Open Carry for people who choose to do so though I don't do so myself. For several reasons.
First, some discretion is in order. In some places open carry will bring you more trouble than you want no matter how legal you are. Harrasment from the cops etc. Misdemeanor charges and so forth. Especially in cities and larger towns. That may or may not be worth it to you. You're certainly asking for more grief carrying a pistol open in Philly than in Perkasie or Hazleton.
Second, and more importantly, open carry marks you. Not to law abiding folks. But say you're in a convenience store when a robbery starts up. You're far more likely to be the first target if they see you carrying a gun. So, if you do open carry, practice practice practice that you can get that weapon into play before someone points one at you.
The third problem is weapon retention. Far easier for someone to grab your gun while you're carrying open than concealed so be sure you have good retention system for that firearm.
Certainly showing up at rallies and such Open Carry would be a good way to start with Civil Disobedience. I wouldn't walk into a courthouse with a gun strapped on though.
In your state, Pasto, you have the right to Open Carry and UNLOADED firearm and must carry the magazine or speedloader also openly in a separate pouch. Kinda defeats the purpose if you ask me. So I don't know what the Armenians were doing.
Anyway, all that said, I'm all for Open Carry and would encourage anyone who can do so legally to do so if they choose. Just understand the potential ramifications. While we're exercising our Right we don't want to come off as kooks doing so. In both cases mentioned above I don't think either came off as kooks except to some dumbass chickenshit who understands neither American Tradiiton, the law, or the concept of self defense and being responsible for your own safety.
The Founders affirmed this right in the 2nd. They didn't give us the right, merely recognized that it existed and couldn't be stripped away.
The Second Amendment PROTECTS the Right to keep and bear arms. It did not create it.
Personally, I don't care much about guns. I'm not a gun guy.
And, it is on a very rare occasion that I have even written about the Second Amendment.
But, Obama is proving himself to be openly hostile to the American Tradition, and I want him driven from office.
The only way to do that is for us to make people aware just how far afield the man is from the Constitution. We need to start a reeducation project.
I agree with you, we do not want to come off as kooks.
But, the truth is, it is our right to keep and bear arms.
And, the reason for the Second Amendment was explicity spelled out for us by the Founding Fathers. It is to keep the government in check.
I noticed that Pastorius-re; the Armenian men (plural) and they (plural) ...
The man (singular) at the Obama rally ..
The Lone Wolf gets picked off-so-we must learn - to travel - at least - in pairs-even if we are only going to speak at a rally - or group-
As to open carry-that too..the Armenian men were playing it smart...
C-CS
BTW for all you newcomers who haven't run into me yet & think I'm just running at the mouth I do carry, open and concealed, 24/7 except where outlawed (victim disarmament zones).
Post a Comment