Maybe you think she should consider herself lucky. Afterall, in Tehran she could have been placed in a shroud, buried in a pit up to her chest and stoned to death for the same crime. Or had a hood put over her head, a noose around her neck and lifted by a crane to slowly twirl in the wind & heat & sun struggle kick her shackled bound feet while sound light & life slowly fade and she suffocates under her own weight. Not even drop from a gallows and hope for a quick broken neck.
Or maybe her brother would have taken her outside to an alley, first she feels the cold steel of the blade before the hot slash and the warm blood filling her throat and running down her neck but only after her vagina bruised bleeding on fire from being gangraped by his friends for dishonoring the family.
Or her father fires a .38 point blank into her face while she sits in the backseat of the car after being picked up from a party by a man she "trusts". The last thing she knows is a blinding flash, not even the sound of the shot the bullet crashing through her skull before the sound gets there. Another honor killing.
So yes, I guess this girl could consider herself lucky, don't you?.
THIS IS ISLAM.
h/t Atlas Shrugs
C'mon, DENY IT, you nasty evil goat-fucking jihadi bastards! The Burqa, the beatings, the stonings -- you're afraid of women you sissy-phants. C'mon and deny it! I dare you! You come over here read these stories look at the girly pictures and get off on watching this kind of shit. Deny it you Bastards! Women SCARE you! You chain and enslave them because You can't admit that the least little girl in a Burqa is equal to or better than that piece of shit our president is bowing to. You are pathetic little maggots feeding on pig excrement.
story from The Times Online:
Radicals beat girl, 17, in Islamic stronghold of Swat, Pakistan
This grainy footage appears to show a 17-year-old girl being beaten by Islamic radicals in Pakistan’s northwestern region of Swat, where Sharia law was introduced after the government reached a truce with the Taleban in February.
A local Taleban commander in the militant stronghold of Matta, 25 miles from the regional capital, Mingora, ordered the girl to be flogged a week ago after accusing her of adultery, according to local reporters.
But some residents of Matta have accused the commander of ordering the beating to get revenge after the girl refused to accept his proposal of marriage, the reporters told The Times.
“Please! Enough! Enough!” the girl is heard crying in Pashtu, the language of the tribes who dominate northwestern Pakistan – now the main hub of Taleban and al-Qaeda activity.
At another point, she cries: “I am repenting, my father is repenting what I have done, my grandmother is repenting what I have done...”
The man flogging her is also heard abusing his colleague as he struggles to hold her down and stop her covering her backside with her hands.
“You should hold her tightly so she doesn’t move,” he is heard saying.
President Zardari of Pakistan insists that the truce was made with “moderates” in the region and his officials have even held it up as a model for other parts of Pakistan’s troubled northwest, which borders Afghanistan.
The deal was agreed with Sufi Mohammed, the leader of an outlawed Islamic movement who was recently released after six years in jail for leading thousands of his supporters to Afghanistan to fight American forces in 2001.
He is the father-in-law of Mullah Fazlullah, the 33-year-old cleric who leads the Pakistani Taleban in Swat and is known for propagating his strict interpretation of Islam through pirate FM radio broadcasts.
Pakistani officials argue that many residents of the Swat Valley, which only became part of Pakistan in 1969, have long demanded Sharia law because of the weakness of the secular state judicial system.
However, this footage appears to back up reports from many local residents that the men who have over-run Swat are no more moderate than the Taleban government that ruled Afghanistan until 2001.
It is also likely to reinforce fears that the militants are now using Swat, which is just 100 miles from the Pakistani capital, as a base to spread their ideology and launch terrorist attacks deeper within Pakistan.
MR note -- please forgive that I've stickied this at the top for a few hours. we've got pedestrians stop by who really need to see this.
8 comments:
Swat, Waziristan ..no pakistani sovereignty
RUN BY THE ENEMY
If Swat and Waziristan act as sovereign states, the U.S., in theory, should have no problem bombing them to smithereens. Since Pakistan gave up their sovereignty of the two regions, they are effectively their own states. The two regions have practically declared war on coalition forces, therefore the "states" should be fair game for aerial bombardment and ground assaults.
Total,
You are TOTALLY correct on that.
In fact, I think this might have been part of the logic behind the ceding of these two areas.
I used to wonder where my "tipping point" for being willing to defend myself and my family was.
Thanks to Koh, I know.
Any hint that any bit of Sharia will be imported into our civil or criminal justice legal systems is it.
NO ONE is defending the Constitution anymore. Even the "conservatives" argue economic fascism ON ITS MERITS. BUT IT IS ILLEGAL for the executive branch to "mandate" or "require" anything of these companies, or "take over" companies.
IT IS ILLEGAL for Congress to approve the money to "bailout" companies. See the separation of powers Articles.
So, if no one in our "government" will defend the Constitution on these grounds, they probably won't defend the Bill of Rights against Sharia either.
So now we have to.
I-as a woman- keep waiting for NOW to step up and express 'out-rage' at Sharia treatment of women---HMMMM-me 'thinketh' that NOW's primary agenda is not women...
C-CS
More grovelling dhimmitude from the BBC www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1166912/Mohammed-cartoonist-accuses-BBC-appeasing-Muslim-fanatics-showing-interview.html
NOW? Just check out Phyllis Chesler on that one.
If NOW is not going utterly berserk over clitoral amputation what's it gonna take? Code Pink on a mission to KSA forced into a seraglio of permanent 'temporary' marriages?
The dialectic does not support NOW taking action, except against domestic enemies (i.e. republican and conservative people..as THEY define it).
Code Pink stuck in a KSA seraglio (technically shouldn't it be Iran? Aren't temp marriages Shiite?) is a win-win situation: sending our worst enemies a cage full of rabid fruit bats. Lock 'em up together and throw away the key.
By the time NOW is ready to deal with Sharia law, Sharia law will be so advanced that NOW will be outlawed. PC trumps everything with most "women's rights" groups. Everything. They fulminate about manufactured "discrimination" issues and do everything to avoid a real down and dirty fight over basic rights violations whether here or in China or in KSA. Most of them would still be spouting the "disenfranchised Asian youth" line if their own daughters were victims of Muslim gang-bangs.
I expect a women's rights advocate to stand up and say, I am a sovereign being and will fight any attempt by others to seize control of my person for their own or anyone else's ends. Same thing I expect of a man.
Post a Comment