Sunday, November 22, 2009

CAIR Threatens Maine School to Force Muslim Prayer Time

From Atlas Shrugs:

Here we go! Lewiston, the city that has struggled for years ever since federal government contractors, such as Catholic Charities, chose it as a site for refugee resettlement and after a secondary migration of mostly Somali refugees picked this city in “welcoming” Maine, the joys of multiculturalism have come home to roost. And, darn, just when town fathers thought citizens were finally getting the memo that diversity is strength something like this happens.

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) the subject of an important new book entitled, “Muslim Mafia:Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” has the audacity to threaten to bring action against a school district that supposedly denied a Muslim girl the right to pray during school. Here is the story from the Sun Journal today. Hat tip: Mars

LEWISTON — A national Muslim civil rights organization has filed a formal request with the Lewiston School Department to allow a middle school student to pray on school property. The group also wants Lewiston to modify existing policy and provide “constitutionally protected religious accommodation,” such as a designated prayer room.

The group has also requested the school department institute diversity training for school staff, and to ensure the middle-schooler won’t face retaliation because of her request to pray at the Lewiston Middle School.

According to the Washington, D.C.,-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, seventh-grader Nasra Aden had been routinely “praying discreetly during her free time or lunch break in a corner of a school hallway.” But, on Tuesday, CAIR asserts a teacher told Aden “never to pray on school property” after Aden was seen preparing to kneel in prayer in a corner of one of the hallways.

After Aden told her mother, Jamad Warsame, what happened, Warsame spoke with school Principal Maureen Lachappelle and asked the school to accommodate her daughter’s desire to pray. According to CAIR, Warsame’s request was rebuffed and she has been “forced to pick up her daughter every day and take her to a nearby park to pray.”

Lachappelle said Aden is not being forced to leave school to pray, but that the district accommodated her mother’s request for her to leave the campus this past week for prayer.

Lewiston Superintendent Leon Levesque, who learned of CAIR’s written accusations hours after a press release had already been published on various Web sites, said, “Students are free to pray quietly during class if they choose as long as it’s not disruptive,” because “prayer is constitutionally protected in schools.”

“A stunning scenario of lack of multicultural competency” —they have learned the lingo!

In a written statement, Ismail Warsame called school officials’ alleged actions in responding to Aden’s effort to pray “a stunning scenario of lack of multicultural competency” and “clear violation of our constitutional rights to free religious expression.”

Warsame also accused Lachappelle of hanging up on him as he was asking whether the school department would accommodate the family’s request to accommodate the specific religious needs of certain students. Lachappelle acknowledged she did end a phone conversation with Warsame abruptly because “he wouldn’t take no for an answer.”

According to Lachappelle, after an involved conversation about the school’s position on allowing silent prayer, she said she told Warsame that “this is what the ruling is. We’re disagreeing, and I’m following district policy. I feel we need to end this conversation.”

Readers should know that we have had reports from many cities about the fact that some Muslim men do not respect female school teachers and administrators, so that may explain what happened in this phone conversation.

Ibraham Hooper threatens: Do what we say, or else!

CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper said Friday that if the Lewiston School Department did not address its four requests to allow prayer, modify school policy, institute training and protect Aden from retaliation, “we wouldn’t really have much choice but to take the case further” because “the student has the legal right and the constitutional right to pray in school in a manner that is not disruptive to the learning environment.”

7 comments:

Damien said...

Pastorius,

If CAIR finds a lawyer to sue the school, and take this to court, the school should be able to win. The school should point out that CAIR is an un indited co conspirator in several terrorism cases, and that its currently under investigation by the government. If that does not work, then school should fight this on separation of Church and State grounds. Islam is a religion, so they can just point out that giving any special treatment to Islam violates the establishment clause. They can point out, that its unconstitutional to give any religion special treatment. When CAIR tries to play the race card, point out that it has nothing to do with race. Force CAIR into a situation where they end up admitting that they want Islam to get special treatment.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

Also it will force liberals who won't speak out against this, or even support this, into an awkward situation. They will than look like hypocrites if they argue that a non Christian religion should be given special treatment, when they condemn the idea of religion in government.

Pastorius said...

Damien,
I see what you mean, but it seems to me Liberals HAVE been arguing that non-Christian religions ought to be given an unfair advantage, and they have been doing so for years.

Liberals have no problem with Paganism, Wicca, Hinduism, Santaria, Buddhism, etc.

But, just try injecting some Christianity into the world, and you will be censured.

Judaism is a mixed-bag for Liberals. If the Judaism includes "Zionism" (which is, essentially, survivalism for Jews, in my opinion), then Liberals HATE IT.

But, if it is Liberal Judaism, containing no element of survivalism, but instead including all other religions (a la faddish Kabbala, and Reform Judaism) then Libs are all for it.

LIBS LOVE JEWS WHO WILL NOT HOLD UP THE TRAINS FROM RUNNING ON TIME.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

Remember that essay written by Rob Taylor, that I showed you awhile back called "The Progressive War on Religion?" You could argue that, based on what he said, for the most part the radical left mistreats people of all faiths that don't share their vision.

Plus if the school did use my strategy, it could force leftists who think like that to defend their reasoning. If the school's lawyer asks "would you treat them the same way, if Christian students were making similar demands?" and judge insists he wouldn't, than all the defense has to do is point out case after case where the court ruled against Christians making similar demands. If its a radical left wing judge, and he actually comes out and says that non Christian faiths are different and rules in favor of CAIR, it will than upset a lot of people, and end up on just about every right wing talk show. It will make the judge seem unreasonable to a whole lot of people, get people to realize that the liberals are playing favorites. Even if School loses, it could send people a message those leftists wouldn't want to send without even realizing it.

Pastorius said...

Damien,
You said: the radical left mistreats people of all faiths that don't share their vision.


I say: I fail to see that that is true.

Could you give me an example?

I'll give you an example which is contrary.

The radical left supports Feminism, and yet remains silent on Islam-inspired Honor Killings, clitorectomies, and enslavement of women.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

Islam seems to be an exception, in large part because of fear.

Pastorius said...

Fear is part of it. The other part is Leftists see Islam as a challenge to the Conservative Capitalist American system. And, they see anything which is a challenge to our system as being a good thing.

Additionally, both Leftists and Islam are ultimately totalitarian, so they are fellow travellers.

The totalitarian approach is more important to both groups than is the fact that they don't fully agree on policy.

It's about power, more than policy, in my opinion.

Hey, I could be wrong.