This is devastating.
Anti-Catholics everywhere are gleefully rubbing their hands. There is serious blood in the water.
But if the allegations I began hearing about yesterday are true – and it will take a damn sight more than just the MSM saying they are to prove their veracity to me – then Benedict is not the man I thought and we all hoped and he must step down.
For a Church not fully recovered from the American abuse scandals this comes as a major body blow, not a knockout punch (yet) but surely sending us back on our heels.
I say not a knockout punch yet because the Church and the Papacy has endured far worse scandals in its long history. And if they quickly come clean on this it will survive though seriously battered.
But it must come clean. No hiding behind The Seal of the Confessional. If, as a Bishop, Ratzinger knew of these abuses and actively worked to hide them, whether by moving priests around (a charge I heard yesterday morning but cannot, honestly, remember where) or declaring they were covered up by Pontifical Secrecy, then he must step down. He is not fit to lead the Church’s faithful.
It is one thing to hear in a confessional of dark deeds and advise the penitent to be forgiven of his sins he must come clean of them with the law. It is quite another to actively engage in hiding them.
I don’t know that Catholics will continue to follow a man who sits there mute as the most egregious of offenses are laid at his feet. Nor would they follow a man who confesses to them what he did and refuses to stand aside.
The Third Secret of Fatima is said to be the Church’s loss of the faithful in great numbers.
Benedict is Christ’s Vicar but he is still a man and subject to the same laws as us all. If he is found to be hiding knowledge of sins against the most innocent among us it may indeed rend the Church.
Whether they are true or not Benedict himself needs to address them. Not through a Vatican spokesman, but directly himself, not just as the successor to Peter, or the leader of a billion people worldwide, but as a man now accused.
"Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me; but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.
"Woe to the world for temptations to sin! For it is necessary that temptations come, but woe to the man by whom the temptation comes!
And if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away; it is better for you to enter life maimed or lame than with two hands or two feet to be thrown into the eternal fire.
And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire.
"See that you do not despise one of these little ones; for I tell you that in heaven their angels always behold the face of my Father who is in heaven.
Matthew 18:5-10
Pope will struggle to survive abuse scandal
By John Cooney
Saturday March 13 2010
A depressing week for Pope Benedict dramatically escalated last night into an unprecedented papal crisis when he was directly implicated in a cover-up of a German paedophile priest when he was Cardinal Archbishop of Munich 30 years ago.
The latest revelations are so potentially damaging to the reputation of then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger that speculation was mounting last night that they could severely, perhaps even irreparably, damage his moral authority as Pope Benedict XVI.
It was being speculated that the German Pope could conceivably have to recognise that his position as supreme pontiff could become untenable -- and do what was until now considered impossible, resign from the Petrine throne.
Dismay
Benedict got a first-hand readout of the scope of the scandal yesterday in his native land from the head of the German Bishop's Conference, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, who reported that the pontiff had expressed "great dismay and deep shock" over the scandal, but encouraged bishops to continue searching for the truth.
Less than a month after the Pope's summit meeting in Rome with the Irish bishops, at which he ordered them to step united in line behind the papal throne, the abuse issue is no longer "an Irish problem", as one senior Vatican cardinal crassly claimed. Clerical child abuse is now a German problem. It has become a Dutch problem. It is also an Austrian problem.
This Europe-wide dimension, on top of similar scandals and cover-ups in the United States, the Philippines and Mexico, to name but a few, makes it Rome's problem. To paraphrase former US president Harry Truman, the buck stops on the Pope's desk, as the spiritual leader of over one billion Catholics worldwide.
In the Pope's homeland of Germany the number of alleged victims nationwide has soared to 300 since the scandals first broke last month in a Jesuit-run boarding school in Berlin.
The Dutch church has climbed to 350 complaints just a week after the Salesians first admitted they were investigating claims that three pupils in a school were abused in the 1960s. In Austria, the Benedictine arch-abbot of St Peter's in Salzburg has resigned after admitting he abused a 12-year-old boy 40 years ago.
Worse still for Pope Benedict, the public spotlight has zoomed in on his older brother (86), Monsignor Georg Ratzinger, who denies that the issue of sexual abuse came to his notice when he was master of Germany's most illustrious group of choir boys in Regensburg from 1964 until 1994.
A former singer in the choir has alleged it was well known among the boarders that a headmaster of the school, now dead, would summon two or three of the boys from their dormitories to come up to his room, where abuse would take place.
"The issue of sexual abuse never came up but if I had known with what exaggerated brutality he (the former headmaster) had proceeded, then I would have said something," Mgr Georg said on Tuesday.
Questions
Questions are being asked about how the Pope dealt with abusive clergy when he was Cardinal Archbishop of Munich-Freising from 1977 to 1982, before he moved to Rome to head the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith.
Cardinal Ratzinger's central role in handling abuse cases as 'the Vatican Rotweiller' has come back to haunt him as Pope Benedict, principally his 2001 confidential directive to bishops "on more serious crimes". This gave the Doctrinal Congregation control over how the church handles cases of sexual abuse of minors by priests.
This week Vatican spin-doctors robustly presented this directive as an important advance in making sure priest perverts were brought to justice.
The Vatican spokesman, Fr Frederico Lombardi, stressed it dealt with how canon law treated cases, and insisted this was not a substitute for civil law, which deals with the offence separately.
However, the media has interpreted the directive as a ban on bishops reporting serious accusations to civil authorities. The rub is that a personal letter from Cardinal Ratzinger to bishops accompanying the 2001 document said complaints against paedophile priests were covered by "pontifical secret", to be handled by bishops in strict confidentiality. Thus, the charge of "cover-up" against the Pope.
The Irish bishops at their Wednesday news conference in Maynooth backed the Vatican interpretation and accused the media of misrepresentation of Benedict. The Bishop of Dromore, John McAreavey, said it was clear to the bishops at their Rome summit that the 2001 letter "in no way precluded church authorities from their civil obligations, especially in regard to reporting and cooperating fully with the civil authorities."
The Irish bishops may have made the wrong call. Only hours after the Pope's meeting with Cardinal Zollitsch, the world's attention switched to his involvement in the 'Fr H' cover-up. Benedict is now in the eye of the biggest sex abuse crisis to hit the Vatican. Whether he can survive is doubtful -- if the Catholic Church he rules is also to survive.
- John Cooney
Pastorius adds:
I don't have much to add. But, I will say this;
1) If this is true, and it sounds like it is, then this will be a very pathetic end to the public life of a great man.
2) The greatest of men have their flaws. That being said, this is a TERRIBLE flaw. The Bible says, "No man is Good. Only God is Good."
3) If this is true, then I can only speculate that Benedict falsely believes that it is his mission as a Christian to be forgiving of all sins. It is not an individual Christians place to forgive those who break the laws of nations, or to forgive those who commit unpardonable sins. "Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord." He could have also said, "Forgiveness is mine," for He is the fount of all Forgiveness. We are not. God did not say, "Be ye lawless in the name of Forgiveness." In fact, He said, "Go now and sin no more."
The Pope is not, and has never been, the arbiter of Judgement and Forgiveness, no matter what anyone thinks, even the Pope himself.
(update h/t In Mary's Image)
This would seem to indicate Benedict had no knowledge of the crimes. I desperately hope that is true.
But either way HE NEEDS TO PERSONALLY ADDRESS THIS. The Faithful (and all of us) need to hear either his denial or explanation of the charges directly from his own mouth.
Catholic News Agency:
Vatican: Pope was 'completely extraneous' to Munich sex abuse decision
Vatican City, Mar 13, 2010 / 12:22 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Fr. Federico Lombardi, director of the Holy See's Press Office, released a statement on Saturday morning in which he made three "observations" regarding sexual abuse by people and in institutions of the Catholic Church. He also addressed dismissed as unfounded attempts to link the Pope to a decision to transfer a priest found to have committed sexual abuse when Benedict XVI was Archbishop of Munich.
The first of the three "observations" made by Fr. Lombardi was to point out that the "line taken" by the German Bishops' Conference has been confirmed as the correct path to confront the problem in its different aspects.
Fr. Lombardi included some elements of the statement made by Archbishop Robert Zollitsch at a Friday press conference following his audience with the Pope. The Vatican spokesman highlighted the approach established by the German bishops to respond to the possible abuses: "recognizing the truth and helping the victims, reinforcing the preventions and collaborating constructively with the authorities - including those of the state judiciaries - for the common good of society."
Fr. Lombardi drew attention to Archbishop Zollitsch's affirmation, without any doubts, of the expert opinion that the vow of celibacy of the priest has no relationship to cases of pedophilia.
He also reaffirmed that the Holy Father supports the German bishops in their plan and that this approach could be considered "useful and inspiring" to other episcopal conferences in similar situations.
Secondly, Fr. Lombardi referred to the interview given to Avvenire by the "promoter of justice" from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Monsignor Charles Scicluna, who explained in detail the norms of the Church for investigating cases of sexual abuse of minors.
The Vatican spokesman highlighted the most important element of the interview: that the Church has in no way promoted hiding the crimes, but has put an "intense activity" in motion to confront, judge and punish them in an appropriate manner "within the framework of ecclesiastical ordinance."
He also wrote that it is important to note that special attention was given to these themes when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict, was the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
"His line has always been that of rigor and coherence in confronting even the most difficult situations," added Fr. Lombardi.
The final observation Fr. Lombardi made was that a recent communique from the Archdiocese of Munich answers questions about a priest who was found guilty of abuses after being transferred from Essen to Munich, where Cardinal Ratzinger was archbishop at the time. The communique, he stressed, shows that the archbishop was completely "extraneous" to the decisions made after the abuses were verified.
"It's rather evident that in recent days there are those who have sought - with a certain tenacity, in Regensburg and in Munich - elements for personally involving the Holy Father in the questions of the abuses. For every objective observer, it's clear that these efforts have failed," he stated.
The Vatican spokesman concluded by reaffirming that "despite the tempest," the Church sees the course to follow "under the sure and rigorous guide of the Holy Father."
Fr. Lombardi concluded by expressing his hope that the process might help all of society to "take charge" of improving ways to protect and form children and youth.
19 comments:
I don't have much to add. But, I will say this;
1) If this is true, and it sounds like it is, then this will be a very pathetic end to the public life of a great man.
2) The greatest of men have their flaws. That being said, this is a TERRIBLE flaw. The Bible says, "No man is Good. Only God is Good."
3) If this is true, then I can only speculate that Benedict falsely believes that it is his mission as a Christian to be forgiving of all sins. It is not an individual Christians place to forgive those who break the laws of nations, or to forgive those who commit unpardonable sins. "Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord." He could have also said, "Forgiveness is mine," for He is the fount of all Forgiveness. We are not. God did not say, "Be ye lawless in the name of Forgiveness." In fact, He said, "Go now and sin no more."
The Pope is not, and has never been, the arbiter of Good and Evil, no matter what anyone thinks, even the Pope himself.
and for a little different perspective
"Fr. Federico Lombardi, director of the Holy See's Press Office, released a statement on Saturday morning in which he made three "observations" regarding sexual abuse by people and in institutions of the Catholic Church. He also addressed dismissed as unfounded attempts to link the Pope to a decision to transfer a priest found to have committed sexual abuse when Benedict XVI was Archbishop of Munich"
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/vatican_pope_was_completely_extraneous_to_munich_sex_abuse_decision/
btw, I tried to email that information to you MR, but it was returned for this reason:
Remote host said: 550 SC-004 Mail rejected by Windows Live Hotmail for policy reasons. A block has been placed against your IP address because we have received complaints concerning mail coming from that IP address. If you are not an email/network admin please contact your
I guess when you are working for the greater Glory of God, what matters the effect on the lives of a few thousand little children. After all, it's not like they were fertilized eggs. These were thinking beings and therefore capable of "sin", right?
Or is there another excuse for the sickening callousness the Holy Roman Catholic Church has shown for the victims of these perverts? Not that it's confined to the Church. Baby-rapers, be they Catholic, satanist, or something in between, have a real talent for taking onlookers on the great DeNial cruise.
Is fuckin' Bernard Cardinal Law still in his cushy job over there in the Vatican? That's where the Holy Mother Church sent him after ut came out that he was shuffling baby-rapers around to different parishes and he had to get his ass out of Boston ASAP.
The Catholic Church is, as always, fundamentally concerned with whatever is to the advantage of the Catholic Church. This scandal just goes further up than the previous ones. They make me sick with their excuses and self-righteousness and hypocrisy.
But then, we atheists have no moral sense do we -- no "understanding" of the overriding importance of "faith" as compared with the fucking up of the lives of thousands of Catholic kids. Well, Fallaci was an atheist and if she could climb out of the grave and see what Ratzinger, whom she trusted, has been doing, she would horsewhip the bastard through the streets of Rome.
Bring it on. I'm not in the mood for making nice tonight.
If anyone happens to be interested in what it was like in Boston, here's a good place to start:
http://www.boston.com/globe/spotlight/abuse/stories3/121402_admission.htm
If this is what Ratzinger has been doing, then may he meet the same fate as Law. Except he won't be able to get a cushy job at the Vatican.
The Catholic Church has hardly been indifferent to the sufferings of the victims of predator priests. Perhaps you missed the very public apologies made by the Pope all over the world? Perhaps you missed the private meetings the Pope had with victims? Perhaps you missed the fact that parishes have been forced to close down because of the large sums of money paid in reparation to the victims? Perhaps you've missed the numbers of priests who've been dismissed from the Church and tried in criminal courts? What more can the Church do in reparation? Name another institution which has worked so hard to rectify the culture of silence which bred this horrifying behavior. Do you know that every adult who works in any capacity for the Church must now under go a background check? Do you know every adult must also participate in child protection sessions? What more should the Church be doing? The Church is a perfect institution filled with imperfect human beings who sometimes do terrible, horrific things.
And of course I hope that people will wait to find out the real story with all the facts before they leap like lemmings to a false conclusion...
"The accused was not a priest of the Munich archdiocese, but a priest from the Diocese of Essen, who had been sent to a facility in Munich for counseling. So the then-Cardinal Ratzinger was not responsible for his treatment; his only connection with the case was his decision to let the priest stay in a rectory in the Munich archdiocese while he was undergoing treatment there. There is no evidence that the Pope was aware the accused priest was an accused pedophile; he was evidently informed only that the priest had been guilty of sexual improprieties"
http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otn.cfm?id=624
and then there is this, surprisingly from the AP
"BERLIN — Pope Benedict XVI's former German diocese said Friday it made a mistake when the pontiff was archbishop in allowing a priest suspected to have abused a child to return to pastoral work. However, it said Benedict wasn't involved in the decision.
Earlier, Germany's top bishop briefed Pope Benedict XVI on the spiraling cases of clerical sex abuse in the pontiff's native Germany and said the pope encouraged him to pursue the truth and assist the victims.
At the Vatican, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch said the pope was "greatly dismayed" and "deeply moved" as he was being briefed on the scandal during his 45-minute private audience in the Vatican. Zollitsch said he briefed the pope in particular on the measures being taken so far to confront the scandal."
Hmmmm...
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jQWrzPjAEtxgfa_tARqu5413A4PAD9EDA4181
Thanks, IMI.
It's hard to believe Benedict/Ratzinger would have been so insensitive.
The man has lived, to my knowledge, an exemplary life, and certainly his writings have been beautiful and impeccable.
Thank you, IMI.
So I think the next question can be: why would a news agency report a patently false story, a story that is so easy to refute? Gosh, it couldn't be to defame and slander the Catholic Church, could it? It doesn't matter now, the damage is done, as evidence by RRA's comments. The damage is done.
The pedophilia scandals are as painful for the Catholic faithful as they are to everyone else involved. Some of our loved ones were the victims as well.
Don't patronize me, IMI. Apologies? Meetings with victims? Priests actually arrested and tried in courts for raping chldren? Church workers compelled to learn how to protect children from such priests? Oh the horrors the Perfect Institution of the Roman Catholic Church is being SLANDERED and having to SUFFER because it turned a blind eye when the most defenseless beings under its care were tormented by the very men who were supposed to have a direct line to the loving god who would never, ever, let such things happen in HIS Church. "The damage is done". Sigh. Weep. Now the godless atheists are making Insensitive Remarks. Well, we know what THEY are...
Try telling that to anyone, especially Catholics, who went through that nightmare in Boston a few years back. Tell those who saw Barnard Cardinal Law called into the safety of the Vatican instead of going to jail as a priest pimp, thereby showing exactly whose well-being came first in the eyes of the Pope. Tell it to the people who were reassured, and soothed, and told justice would be done, only to get fucked over yet AGAIN.
You have no idea how well I know what it is to see a "priest" -- no not one of yours, but protected because of his "religion" nonetheless -- get away with raping children and terrifying their families and nothing being done because he was only being "persecuted" because of his "religion" y'see -- to see it up close and not be able to get anyone to do anything about it. Because there were More Important Things at Stake. And Important Men might have been exposed and their reputations damaged. Ss/dd.
Well, I did wonder where the Vatican has been while Christians get slaughtered in Iraq and Egypt and Turkey and Iran and while Israel stares into the face of annihilation as her "friends" kiss the ass of Islam. I should have guessed that the Church would rather leave that thankless, troublesome job to "godless atheists" like Geert Wilders. It is way too busy working on "measures to confront the scandal".
RRA has a very good point about Cardinal Law. John Paul II called him into the Vatican (it was done under his watch, so it's his fault).
Benedict has supported John Paul II's Sainthood.
Benedict really ought not do that for a Pope who made did such a thing.
The Catholic Church is a force for good in the world. But, it is a very flawed institution.
Yesterday, MR and I were going back and forth about this in email a bit.
One thing I noted is that God ordered Hosea to marry a whore. The Church (not specifically the Catholic Church, but the Church as an all-encompassing body of all the believers in Christ) is a whore.
Simple as that.
The Church turns its back on God every day.
"When the LORD began to speak through Hosea, the LORD said to him, "Go, take to yourself an adulterous wife and children of unfaithfulness, because the land is guilty of the vilest adultery in departing from the LORD."
Perhaps it's just time to review the idea of priest/nun celibacy and marriage in a very public way.
I have a hard time believing this would happen in the same apparent proportion if things were otherwise.
I am sure that there would be those who would then prey on the opposite sex, but is this a problem so large in protestant denominations?
Rabbis? Shaolin priests?
I have no idea what the stats are on this.
The problem is everywhere, Epi; The very Protestant, progressive, Episcopal church---where priests can marry---has had problems, as has the Orthodox Church---again, where priests can marry.
I believe the problem is the general hedonistic outlook in our society, less than the practices of one, particular religious denomination. It affects the supposedly faithful, as well as the unfaithful---and, honestly, I seriously doubt that all a pedophile needs is a good wife, and that will cure his problems. As far as that goes, look at the UN sex scandals, which can't be blamed either on religion, or enforced celibacy.
I can not speak for Epa, but I will anyway.
Epa is not saying all a pedophile needs to keep him from pedophilia is a good wife.
Epa is saying get the pedophiles out of the Priest business, so they do not have the power of the Catholic Church behind them.
It's like making a murderer a Judge.
We don't want terrible people in positions of authority.
And yet, the Catholic Church is set up in such a way that very troubled people are PRECISELY the people who will go into the Priesthood. It's a great escape.
And the UN isn't set up in such a way? Or secular slave traffickers, who are often backed by the rich and powerful? Or ultra liberal Protestant churches, which have had exactly the same sort of problems?
The Catholic Church needs to be cleaned up. But it's not the only institution that does. The problem is all over, not just the Catholic church.
We've already got terrible people in authority, and not just in Catholic Church.
That's a very good point, Anonymous.
Thanks.
Post a Comment