Even the fawning Washington Post reporter has to admit this simple truth about the life of Ali Jinnah:
No one in public life is free of controversy, of course, not even a founding father. In political life, the two suffered accusations of inconsistency: Jefferson for not being robust in defending Virginia from an invading British fleet with Benedict Arnold in command; Jinnah for abandoning his role as ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity and becoming the champion of Pakistan.Can you imagine if a Presbyterian said, You know, Presbyterians can not live with Hindus. We must have our own state."
Would the Washington Post celebrate that on the 4th of July?
But, in a way, we can thank Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Because, really, who wants to live with such Muslims?
13 comments:
The Washington Post provides yet another blatant example of "useful idiocy", having been infiltrated by Islamic interests who routinely co-opt everything in sight and deceptively claim in the name of Islam. The WP writer in this instance is one, Akbar Ahmed. His identity clarifies his allegiance and goal as he plants his flag of allegiance on this calendar day.
Spit.
Everywhere Islam lands, the flag of conquest pops up. Across the Atlantic, we witness more of the same lunacy: Political correctness run amok in Italy: Prize for race held in honor of Madonna of Provenzano painted by Muslim, contains Qur'anic verses
The shame of all this is the degree of ignorance in this country permits this insanity to continue unabated.
HRW
Can you imagine if a Presbyterian said, You know, Presbyterians can not live with Hindus. We must have our own state."
Would the Washington Post celebrate that on the 4th of July?
Pastorius,
This is hardly something to celebrate on the fourth of July, even many people who are more politically correct than we are, could easily see the contradiction between this and American values.
Yep, but apparently, the Washington Post can not.
Pastorius,
Unfortunately, but maybe they'll receive a few angry letters from some of their readers.
Wow this is completely antithetic to secularism , human rights and democracy the champion of which is the US. Jinna's Pakistan [more popularly PORKISTAN] has defied all these values. Why the hell is the author so desperate to link pak n US???
Note the information about the author of the article:
Akbar Ahmed is the Ibn Khaldun chair of Islamic studies at American University's School of International Service. This essay is adapted from his new book, "Journey Into America: The Challenge of Islam."
I predict that the book will be required reading in some courses, probably required courses.
AKKI,
The thing is, EVENTUALLY, SOMEONE IS GOING TO HAVE TO HANDLE THEM.
Yeah.... But isn't it easier as they are all aggregated in pak???
I mean we now know where we want our drones to strike don't we???
True. Another key problem is the destruction of Indus Vally civilization's historical relics in the name of blasphemy in pak. Even if people don't worship them they used to 1000's of years ago and that's all it takes to destroy them.
Kind of like the bamiyan buddha statues in Afghanistan.
AKKI,
I didn't know about the destruction of Indus Vally civilization's historical relics in the name of blasphemy in Pakistan. Unlike the more famous Bamiyan Buddha statues, I have a feeling that few people know about that, few people will probably know about the Bamiyan Buddha statues in the next twenty five years. Its upsetting how a bunch of people can destroy priceless historical artifacts, just because they offend their religion.
AKKI,
We may never know the full extent of all the knowledge we have lost because of that.
It is highly plausible to consider the fact that by incorporating much of the Pagan s rituals in new religion Islam, mohammad successfully reduced the pagan risk and it was perhaps one of the most important milestone, attempts to conquer the minds of Pagans resulting in massive breakdown of the Pagans moral and support to oppose Islam.
Post a Comment