Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Ayaan Hirsi Ali On The Trial Of Geert Wilders



Imagine if a leader within the tea party movement were able to persuade its members to establish a third political party. Imagine he succeeded—overwhelmingly—and that as their leader he stood a real chance of winning the presidency.

Then imagine that in anticipation of his electoral victory, the Democrats and Republicans quickly modified an existing antidiscrimination law so that he could be convicted for statements he made on the campaign trail.

All of this seems impossible in a 21st-century liberal democracy. But it is exactly what is happening in Holland to Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders.The implications of this trial are enormous.

In the short term, it could bring the simmering tensions between Holland's approximately one million Muslims and the 1.4 million voters who elected Mr. Wilders to a boil.

The Netherlands has seen its share of Islamist violence before and could well see violent confrontations again. 

On a more fundamental level, this trial—even if Mr. Wilders wins—could silence the brave critics of radical Islam. The West is in a war of ideas against political Islam. If free speech is not protected in Europe, we're already losing.

Read the full story here.

More -

Geert Wilders vs the Dutch Inquisition.

Find Wilders not guilty of insulting groups, prosecutors tell court.
Anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders should be found not guilty of insulting Muslims and non-western immigrants as a group, the public prosecution department said at the MP’s trial on Tuesday.By likening the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, Wilders was focusing on Islam and the Koran, rather than Muslims, even if the statement can be considered upsetting, the public prosecutors said during court hearings in Amsterdam.
In addition, there can only be talk of collective insult when a statement damages the entire group, the prosecutors said.AMSTERDAM — Prosecutors say Dutch politician Geert Wilders cannot defend himself on hate speech charges by arguing that remarks he has made critical of Islam are true.
They say there is no general agreement about the nature of Islam and his statements are only his opinion….Prosecutor Birgit van Roessel said at the start of her closing arguments Tuesday that the right to freedom of speech has limits, including when it infringes too far on the right of freedom of religion…. 
"There are all kinds of fights over what is a religion and what isn't," said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center. "Islam is not one of them."

 Read the full story here.

8 comments:

American Rose said...

I think Ayaan is hotter than Femke and deserved a little cat call too. So Femke or Ayaan? I vote Ayaan. :)

Pastorius said...

I agree. Ayaan is WAY hotter than Femke.

We have had Ayaan as babe of the week in the past.

I would not put Femke up as babe of the week.

But, she's do-able.

American Rose said...

No, Femke's definitely a Babe of the Week. Definitely. The word sweet worked well.

Infidel Babes of the World unite!

This was a tough one. :)

Pastorius said...

I must admit, I tend to like dark meat more than I like white meat.

;-)

Alexander Münch said...

Pasto,

IF ! I'm only assuming and don't catch me by the tong ... your decision to stick this photo of "Nature's Freak" as a compensation for the ugliness described in the story attached to it, then it is perfectly O.K. to watch A'jad's speech in the UN with earphones on your head and the "Language Selector Switch" set on Beethoven !...

Pastorius said...

Is it just me, or is AM not making any sense whatsoever?

Alexander Münch said...

Clarification :

1 - Choosing this particular photo of Ayaan Hirsi Ali proves that you have excellent taste!
2 - Her beauty is right at the beginning of the "Gauss Graph" ! The end of this graph is the opposite! Something like, Mr. abdooss...
You see Pasto, Both are unique,rare, statistical freaks if you wish. You and I are somewhere in the middle ( I hope... ) with the masses . See "Bell Curve" here :- http://goo.gl/sr2l

3 - The ugliness described in the story :-
Firstly, I find nothing wrong in the story telling! It is logically presented, honest, no grammatical errors, and no spelling mistakes...
Everybody can see that you are the master of your pen and a man who knows how to place your words !

Secondly, THE UGLINESS IS IN THE SUBJECT ! The best brains in civilized Europe are busy these days appeasing Muzies by crucifying her own sons and daughters! THIS IS UGLY ! In the past, civilized Europe - tried, tortured, burned, her sons and daughters by hundreds, like :- Giordano Bruno, Galileo Galilei, Baruch Spinoza, Joan of Arc, just to name a few. It was ugly then ! It is ugly now ! And for ever it will remain so! UGLY !!!
If you have a substitute for this word, please insert it in !

I hope that I managed to clarify my thought a bit. If not, please wack off my comments from this post.

Alex.

Pastorius said...

Now I understand. Thanks for the clarification.

She is a beautiful woman.

I agree with you that physical beauty is an objective thing, not an opinion, and Hirsi Ali is objectively a beautiful woman, and I would like to subjectively hit dat.