Newsmax:
Chris Christie Reconsidering 2012 Run, Will Decide in Days
Friday, 23 Sep 2011 05:10 PM
By Jim Meyers
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is reconsidering his decision not to enter the 2012 presidential race — and he says he will let top Republican donors know within days about his plans, Newsmax has learned.
During the past few weeks, several leading Republican donors and fundraisers have been urging the popular Republican governor to reconsider his decision not to run and to enter the GOP primary.
These Christie supporters note that significant GOP support has remained on the sidelines of the primary fight. Many leading fundraisers have yet to commit to any current primary contender, including frontrunners Rick Perry and Mitt Romney.
Newsmax has learned that the effort to draft Christie culminated in a hush-hush powwow held in the past week with Christie and several notable Republican billionaires.
A source familiar with the meeting suggested that Christie seemed inclined to enter the race but said he needed more time.
Christie promised to make a final decision "within two weeks," the source said.
Another source involved in GOP fundraising tells Newsmax that that uncommitted fundraisers and donors have been receiving phone calls from top political aides to Christie, seeking their feedback about his possible entry into the race.
Earlier this week Christie hinted at the effort to draft him when he spoke at a special forum that included Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels.
Christie suggested to an audience at New Jersey's Rider University that the current GOP candidates are not answering the public's appetite for real leadership.
"I think what the country is thirsting for, more than anything else right now, is someone of stature and credibility to tell them that and say, 'Here's where I want us to go to deal with this crisis,'" Christie said.
Christie continued: "The fact that nobody yet who's running for president, in my view, has done that effectively is why you continue to hear people ask Daniels if he'll reconsider and ask me if I'll reconsider."
Christie has consistently and categorically stated that he would not run for president in 2012, noting he had significant work still to accomplish in New Jersey.
But New Jersey and New York Republican donors and bundlers who have backed Christie also have been courted in the past several months by Texas Gov. Perry's campaign.
Senior aides to Christie have been quietly urging his supporters not to commit to Perry, indicating Christie was still mulling a bid and would make a final decision after New Jersey's legislative races are completed in November.
But the rapidly changing primary landscape may be changing that timetable.
Perry's quick rise in the polls and indications he may be fading — coupled with nagging questions about Romney's ability to lead the party after backing a Massachusetts healthcare law ominously similar to President Barack Obama's own Obamacare program — may have created a window of opportunity for Christie.
10 comments:
I'll admit I was wrong about Chris Christy - back in the day when he put the teachers union and gave them a lesson about fiscal soundness. Then Christie had to dismiss concerns about Sharia infiltration, appointed a devout muslim judge and approved the GZ mosque. There is no point in his entering the '12 race. He should save the money and effort. I don't know anyone who would vote for him now.
Now you do
No surprise there, EPA, just disappointment. Par for the course.
I knew Perry's campaign would go down in flames when the American people found out what an open borders extremist he is. Good riddance, traitor.
Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who labeled Perry a "stealth jihadist candidate" would really have something to worry about in Chris Christie.
Finally! A candidate that I might actually stay at home for on election day.
Sadly, the current candidates leave me with the all too familiar feeling I'm going to need to hold my nose and pull the lever labeled "anyone but Obama" again.
None of the candidates inspire me.
Each have their strengths and all too damaging weaknesses.
In order of choice, given one of these candidates chooses either John Bolton or LTC Allen West as his/her running mate:
CAIN
Bachman
Santorum
Johnson
Perry
Gingrich
Romney
Huntsman
Paul
Without a strong conservative running mate, it's as good as voting for Obama or a progressive agenda. If there isn't a strong conservative on the ticket I might just stay home.
ANON... (AND PLEASE GET A NAME) No way I stay home if Christie is the nominee.
Are you kidding?
I have no idea who I want, but there is NO POINT in wishing for human combination of Cain/Bolton fused by Jeff Goldblum into one person.
Bolton would be great, but HAS NO SHOT. This is the same message I carry to the Tea party people in Maine over Paul... FORGET IT, and LEAVE BEHIND these kinds of thoughts and think about WHO the people that think WE ARE CRAZY, PARANOID, borderline islamo-phobic- freaks, might HOLD THEIR NOSES and vote for, because there are probably 8-10 of them compared to you WHOEVER THE EFF YOU ARE ANON.
Pick from the best of that group, or YOU, ANON, will be instrumental in the election of Barack Obama to a potentially permanent USA decline for our kids and grandkids.
Why is this so hard to grasp?
IF I could have omnipotence, I'd go back in time and get Newt NOT to dump his wife in her hospital bed with cancer and shake some sense into him, and inform him NOT to run up a 1/2 million $ bill at Tiffany's for his 'JAP' LIKE wife while the nation is sliding into the highest poverty in 85 years and tell Bolton to STFU around Biden so he could get the damn nomination and BE ambassador and put himself into position for the day we NEED him. I'd go back and whack Cain's history teachers over the head so they could instill in him (and PALIN) the love of and need to know what he clearly does not about the world outside so HE/SHE COULD BE OF GREAT USE AND SERVICE WHEN THE NATION HAS NEED OF THEM.
I had hoped for Ryan
But this is bullshit.
Perry
Romney
maybe Christie, but prob too late..
and Perry has for better or worse one GLARING weakness for the middle .. he is a balls to the wall evangelist .. now that doesn't bother me so much, but the voters with a big (I) next to their name.. it bothers them.
This is going to be a near run thing. DESPITE THE CONDITION OF THE NATION.
We have GOT to nominate and wildly support whoever has the (R) and save the goddamn place from becoming Italy II.
Why is this not yet clear?
We (those who want the country to do well) are looking for the absolutely perfect candidate. The one who is all things to all people. Says exactly the right thing on all the right subjects. That candidate does not exist.
Our issue is to get Odama the hell out of office. PERIOD.
I don't think we'll have to hold our noses as w/McCain. I think we'll have a better candidate no matter what, but this 'kiss my butt I ain't voting unless the guy is 100% what I want' is going to give the win to Odama.
America can't afford another 4yrs of the O. It'll take 8yrs to straighten out what he and the Dems have screwed up and that'll just get us back to where we were.
Anybody who stays home on election day will have absolutely NO right to complain at the result. I will be 73 in Nov., & the ONLY vote I refused to cast was when the gubernatorial race in La. was between Edwin Edwards (an arrogant crook) & the horrible thug David Duke.
Silvrlady
Post a Comment