When I was in my late teens, I went on a movie date with the perfect little bimbo to go on a movie date with. At every moment of tension or shock in the movie, she would grab onto my arm in terror, as if I could save her from impending doom.
During one particularly intense sequence in the movie she turned to me, and pleaded, "What's going to happen next?"
Before you laugh too hard at my little bimbette, tell me truthfully, have you not found yourself wondering the exact same thing during these completely, uh, "interesting" times we live in?
It's ok to admit you are scared. Just don't grab onto my sleeve and plead with me to save you or I might kick you ass.
If you want to discuss this whole thing with someone a little more sensitive, you might want to try Frances Porretto:
Click here to read the rest if you dare.
I've made my preparations, such as they are. Six months' emergency food stockpile. A year's expenses in gold and silver. A variety of weapons and ammunition for them. A really big dog. Viewed from that perspective, you might think I've thrown in with the survivalists. But there remains one critical difference between me and them.
I don't want to use those preparations.
I continue to hope that America will wake up to the onrushing catastrophe and turn aside from it.
In Tom Clancy's novel Debt of Honor, immediately after a seemingly shattering attack on the American financial system through a unique computer crime, President Roger Durling reminds us that all our capital -- our buildings, our machines, our instruments, our knowledge and skills, and our land -- is still there. Recovery from the assault, which destroyed only the most recent records of the financial exchanges, required only that America's financial institutions agree to a "do-over," starting from the most recent set of records remaining. It works, precisely because nothing of substance had been destroyed, just as the president has said.
Consider the vast wealth of the United States: more than $100 trillion in land, buildings, machines, instruments, patents and copyrights, and so forth, in continuous use by the ablest, most skilled, most productive 5% of Mankind. This is real. This, not the federal debt, not the shrinking dollar, and certainly not the irrational demands of a bunch of perpetual whiners in Zuccotti Park, is the American productive base. Destroying any significant fraction of it for real would require a nuclear war.
Are we headed for a nuclear war? With anyone who has a destructive capacity equal to our own? Doesn't seem like it to me.
*** If the physical destruction of our capital base appears highly unlikely, let's game out the worst thinkable development we can imagine: the collapse of the dollar under the weight of the federal de
First, trade over long distances would be badly impeded. Without an accepted medium of exchange based on a trusted unit of account, productive persons cannot and will not sell their goods to unknown persons or persons far away. That would be very bad. In the short run, it would bankrupt quite a few firms and throw a fair number of people out of work. But the reinvention of money is already in progress, through electronic funds transfer. It would probably detach from the dollar and recur to a superior unit of account, hopefully a weight of a durable commodity such as gold or silver. Within a few weeks, trade over distance would begin to ramp up again.
Second, the federal government would become unable to pay its bills. The immediate termination of a great many paths of expenditure would follow, by necessity. Thousands of federal employees would be laid off. Washington would no longer be able to borrow, long term or short. Tax revenues, being obligations denominated in dollars, would also collapse. Forgive me if this prospect leaves me dry-eyed.
Third, many persons' savings, kept in entirely dollar-denominated accounts and instruments, would become inaccessible, at least in the short term. Current retirees drawing on their 401(k) accumulations would be severely inconvenienced, and persons hoping to retire immediately on their equities holdings might find it impossible to do so. But apart from simple savings accounts, options, and exotic "derivatives" holdings, dollar-denominated instruments point to a real commitment of some sort: usually, a share in the ownership of a commercial entity. If the companies in which we hold stocks continue to operate, then those stocks would retain at least some of their value. Once a new fiscal basis had arisen, equities would once again be tradable, and therefore capable of sustaining their holders.
Fourth, there would be some degree of civil upheaval. The number of government dependents in this country is appalling, and a great many of them deem themselves "entitled" to government support. Private action to comfort the deserving might handle most of the resulting need, but inevitably there would be some who'd fall through the cracks, or be deemed a "sturdy beggar" undeserving of assistance, or who'd bridle at losing his federal sugar daddy. Private action to maintain public order and protect property rights would become imperative. In a country of 100 million firearms owners, that seems more likely than not.
In sum, there would be dislocations: most severe in the short term, but steadily diminishing as we adapted to the new fiscal reality. There would be some human suffering, but it would be concentrated mainly among persons whose value to others is dubious. If that's the worst of the arguably likely scenarios, we have good reasons for optimism.
*** This morning's TownHall column from the esteemed Phyllis Schlafly posits that none of the current candidates for the Republican Party's presidential nomination "gets it" sufficiently well to handle the national crisis adequately. Miss Schlafly has been right so consistently over the years that it's unwise to doubt her. But to what extent would a president whose heart is in the right place, generally speaking, but who underestimates the magnitude of the danger undermine the prospects for national survival and recovery?
I can't see it mattering much.
11 comments:
Porretto makes an unstated assumption here I can't agree with.
And that is that everyone has made the same preps as he.
I believe a financial collapse is coming, not just to the U.S. but nearly worldwide.
And when it does people will panic. Absolutely and completely.
When the first word gets out that the markets have crashed, or the dollar is worthless, they will rush the banks to withdraw every penny they have.
But many of the banks will be closed, either temporarily or permanently.
They will try swiping their bank cards and credit cards to buy gas a groceries.
But they will be rejected.
And so the panic will build.
Then the hyperinflation will set in. When a loaf of bread or a gallon of milk will cost $100 or $200 (don'tt laugh). And the total anount of cash they've been able to withdraw before the banks shuttered up was $1500.
And the panic will grow.
Forget paychecks. There will be no more paychecks. No more money to replace that $1500 used up on 3 days food supplies. And forget food banks because when people cannot provide for themselves and their families they sure as hell aren't going to be giving it away.
Shelters, too, will close up when cities and town can no longer afford to run them.
Then the store shelves will start to be empty because the stores cannot afford to restock and the trains and trucks no longer run because they can no longer afford the fuel to do so.
The panic will grow and then neighbor will start to turn on neighbor. When you have to defend yourself from someone you've lived side by side with for 10 years with a gun just to protect the extra food you have.
Gangs will start to roam looking for food or general looting.
Who's going to stop them when the police have gone home to protect their own families.
In the rural areas it will be very tough. But they're used to fending for themselves when times are hard.
In the suburbs it is going to be nasty. Think Jericho without the nukes going off.
In the urban areas it will be unreal. Surreal. Medieval.
When people used to public transportation no longer have it.
When they can no longer use their cars to get around.
When you need to go armed to the grocery store (if it's still open) just so you're not murdered for a bag of food.
America will descend into total anarchy
and/or
the government will step in with possibly Draconian measures. Martial law. Gun confiscation. Property confiscation. Suspension of elections. Suspension of the Constitution.
And then groups will start to fight back. Like the Threepers and the various good bad and ugly militias around this country.
And some idiots may call it a revolution.
But no revolution was ever won without backing from a nationstate. Not the one in 1776 nor the most recent in Libya.
So these groups won't have great odds but who knows?
America may indeed re-emerge at the other end of this. In six months or a year or eighteen months. But it is not likely to be the America we know.
If you think this can't happen here then clearly you have not been paying attention.
So go back to your American Idle.
And good luck.
Heh. Yes, I would tend to agree more with your analysis. Maybe he's just saying he can afford to hunker down in his home for months on end, so he is safe.
I don't know.
His larger point I agree with, however. America's assets will not be truly destroyed.
As I have always said, MONEY IS A TEMPERATURE GAUGE OF THE RELATIVE CREATIVITY OF A SOCIETY.
Porretto doesn't agree with that, clearly. Instead, he pines away for a currency based on gold.
But, as money is merely a gauge of creativity, a new currency will be established in time and things will eventually move forward.
Perhaps this is the better (most recent post) place to put this information, as this piece mentions:
" perpetual whiners in Zuccotti Park" - which is run by Brookfield Mgmt.:
We've read about the wind farm funding windfall Brookfield received and speculate it's connection to OWS. What hasn't been mentioned is Brookfied recently announced they are also to become full owner of World Financial Center (WFC);
"••• “Brookfield Office Properties Inc., the reluctant host to the growing Occupy Wall Street protests in Zuccotti Park, is doubling down on Lower Manhattan by expanding its stake in the World Financial Center, the onetime headquarters of Merrill Lynch & Co. Brookfield is in a deal with Bank of America Corp. to buy the financial firm’s 49% stake in 4 World Financial Center, making Brookfield the tower’s full owner, according to people familiar with the matter."•••”
via WSJ
The only way to hunker down in your home and make it is if it looks like this. That is a Cathar chateaux from the 13th century. (NICE PLACE)
And that would make you safe only from local gangs.
One thing is certain, it will SUCK LESS here than any other place. This nation WAS self sufficient. IN EVERYTHING. Including initiative.
And the first one, besides the heavy barrel unit, is ... about changing that semi auto to full....
TVP, STILL $2.65 a pound dry.
Just as H20 and Mr Yoshida and some imagination and c'est gourmandise, especially when the cities are black holes of disease and anarchy.
God help us and god save the USA
yeah some prepin is in order because the people in charge almost seem to want the system to colapse.
at the end of this post I have some good ideas and links to preparing for the first 6 months of colapse.
http://rumcrook.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/pushing-chaos-if-obama-wanted-to-bring-america-to-its-knees-would-he-do-anything-different/
Pasto, I'm arguing w/myself over your definition of money.
I will agree that the money an individual has is a relative gauge of a person's creativity, but money as it is constituted today is only vapor. Money is any medium which people mutually agree they will use as exchange in commerce. Seashells. Big rocks. Beads. Pretty paper.
A FRN is just a pretty green piece of worthless paper, only good so long as people believe that the US is a good place to do business and that the US will be a stable place.
Has the US been $4Trillion worth of creative since '08? No. Except in creatively stealing the hopes and dreams of the people losing everything they have because they played by the rules and got screwed by those more creative at thievery.
Inflation since 1913, has eaten away at the value of the $ to the point where it has lost ~96% of its value ie a $100 today buys what a $1 did in 1913. IF wages had kept up w/inflation, the median income in the US would be $300,000/yr.
The FED has stolen our money and made it worthless.
Gold back $ will not stop creative thieves from gaming the system as Frannie thinks.
Sameno,
I'll address your first paragraph first.
Allow me to go Chance the Gardener on you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Being_There
Creativity is like a garden.
Before any creativity is applied, it is just a wild jungle or forest, overgrown with vines, thorns, thistles, animals, snakes, bugs, etc.
The first thing we do is bring order. We cut down all the out of control stuff. We put in fences. We till the Earth to make it more oxygenated and fertile.
ALL THESE THINGS ARE PRODUCTS OF THE HUMAN MIND; CREATIVITY.
But, so far, all these things are very basic ideas to begin to bring order out of chaos, which is pretty much the natural state of nature, or at least it is according to man's sensibilities, right?
So, next we may take seeds from those plants we cut out. We decide which ones we want and which ones we don't want. We might have noticed that humming birds like pomengranate trees. We think of what kinds of fruits and vegetables we'd want to eat.
These choices, once again, are products of the Human Mind; Creativity.
Then, we decide we want to have this bush because of it's beautiful flowers, this one because of it's fragrance, and this pomegranate tree (even though we don't like pomegranates) because the Humming Birds like the nectar, and we think Humming Birds are beautiful and fascinating.
We are using the products of our human mind to create a beautiful space.
And then, as we sit in the garden we have created in the cool of the evening, we begin to believe that this beautiful order which we have created out of chaos is redolent of a Higher Order that we find within ourselves. Who was this order designed by? And, we decide to create artwork which reflects this Higher Order to adorn our garden.
We have used the products of the Human Mind to create a Sacred Space.
And then we notice that our apples and peaches and pears are subject to all sorts of deformities because of inherent weaknesses. And we notice that some of them, on certain bushes, are not. And, we notice that certain bushes have grown together, spliced themselves together and they produce something in between the fruits of the two bushes. So, we think, let's splice to vines together, to create peaches which are resistant to bugs. And, it works.
And this hybridization is the product of the human mind; Creativity.
And, then we wonder why that works. And, we begin to study the genetic structure of peaches and apples and we find they have many things in common, but there are certain switches in the DNA which cause apples to be more fibrous, and certain switches in the peaches which cause them to be less fibrous and more juicy. And, we figure out how to flip these switches and create new types of fruit which never existed before.
And, that is a product of the human mind; Creativity.
In the beginning of all this, all we were doing was trading peaches and pears to other gardeners for carrots and rasishes.
Now, we are trading in information.
And, our information is the bigger part of our wealth than is the product; the peaches and pears.
And since we have more information which allows us to do more fantastic things with less time spent sweating in the hot sun, and more time in reflection in the cool of the evening in our sacred spaces, we enjoy life more, and we live longer.
All because of the products of the Human Mind; Creativity.
Money is a gauge of all that creativity.
But, think about it this way, the first step was bringing simple order out of chaos. The next step was planting. And the succeeding steps were more and more complex. But each was a quantum leap from the previous. They are all creative ideas.
Now, look at Islamic society and compare it to the USA.
Muslims are stuck at the Sacred Space, and in fact, the Sacred Space has caused them to ignore the first three steps for the most part, and they have, in fact, devolved back into a kind of human-based chaos.
At the same time, the United States is doing everything the United Stats is doing because we have built on all these ideas over large periods of time, passing them down in books and art, etc. And, we don't forget them. We don't disparage them. We give them the respect they are due. We count their worth. We keep records of their worth. Etc.
And so our economy is huge. The Muslim economies are small, shriveled, pathetic. If they did not have oil. They would have almost no economy.
Now to your second paragraph.
You write: Has the US been $4Trillion worth of creative since '08? No. Except in creatively stealing the hopes and dreams of the people losing everything they have because they played by the rules and got screwed by those more creative at thievery.
I respond: No, we have not. The opposite, in fact.
We do not have $4 trillion more. Money is only worth what it can buy. Being ghetto rich in greenbacks is worth nothing, if the greenbacks themselves are worth nothing.
The dollar is only worth what it is worth in terms of goods here in the US, plus what it is worth relative to other currencies, based upon the relative stability (bringing order out of chaos) and creativity of our economy vs. the stability and creativity of other economies.
Does that make sense?
I think if I argue w/you that I will be splitting hairs. I understand where you are coming from w/the creativity concept.
It serves no purpose to either of us for me to butt heads w/you.
Plus you're smarter and I would end up losing anyway.
NEVER!!
Post a Comment