All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Sunday, September 15, 2013
Christmas cancelled in parts of Germany
From Vlad Tepes:
Now we see one stage of multiculturalism. No culture. That will be the stage right before sharia.
Well Pasto on the Quebec story I tend to disagree, I think it's a good thing if people in gov service don't display religious signs, her point of view is that if you work for the gov and display your religious sign you might think the gov supports this religion. She just wants gov employees to look 'neutral' during work.
But my point in coupling the second video with the first is, look at the hoops we have to jump through for the pleasure of having all these Moderate Muslims who get the privilege of spending our lifetimes with.
Sorry but I don't get it at all. Are we saying that a Christian cannot display a cross or a Jewish man wear the skullcap while working in an official government capacity but a Muslima must be granted the right to wear the headbag in the same circumstance? Is that what we are saying here?
PS: The Christmas celebration as we know it today originated in Germany and came to America via German immigrants. For the German government to make such a capitulation, or for the people to accept it, is stunning. It is like US abolishing July 4 celebration to avoid offending these monsters. Unthinkable.
What I'm saying is Canada and Germany seem to be doing away with the official public (governmental) celebration of Christmas because they don't want to have to begin including the cacaphony of Islam in the mix.
This can be looked at two ways,
1) at least we're not celebrating Islam
or
2) Islam is forcing infidel culture to change.
I look at it the second way.
This is my interpretation of the story.
I am not entirely sure why Canada is doing what it is doing.
5 comments:
Well Pasto on the Quebec story I tend to disagree, I think it's a good thing if people in gov service don't display religious signs, her point of view is that if you work for the gov and display your religious sign you might think the gov supports this religion.
She just wants gov employees to look 'neutral' during work.
I agree.
But my point in coupling the second video with the first is, look at the hoops we have to jump through for the pleasure of having all these Moderate Muslims who get the privilege of spending our lifetimes with.
Sorry but I don't get it at all. Are we saying that a Christian cannot display a cross or a Jewish man wear the skullcap while working in an official government capacity but a Muslima must be granted the right to wear the headbag in the same circumstance? Is that what we are saying here?
PS: The Christmas celebration as we know it today originated in Germany and came to America via German immigrants. For the German government to make such a capitulation, or for the people to accept it, is stunning. It is like US abolishing July 4 celebration to avoid offending these monsters. Unthinkable.
What I'm saying is Canada and Germany seem to be doing away with the official public (governmental) celebration of Christmas because they don't want to have to begin including the cacaphony of Islam in the mix.
This can be looked at two ways,
1) at least we're not celebrating Islam
or
2) Islam is forcing infidel culture to change.
I look at it the second way.
This is my interpretation of the story.
I am not entirely sure why Canada is doing what it is doing.
The Germany story seems more clear.
Pastorius said...
1) at least we're not celebrating Islam...
Amen to that, but is that only a temporary reprieve?
Post a Comment