Sunday, September 15, 2013

USA PREPARED TO USE FORCE IN IRAN


From the Washington Post:
President Obama declared Sunday that the United States is still prepared to act militarily to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons despite the decision to pursue a diplomatic deal and not strike Syria over its alleged use of chemical weapons. 
He also acknowledged his approach to the Syria crisis has been uneven, but defended it as producing the right results. 
Obama spoke in an interview broadcast on ABC’s “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos,” taped Friday before the United States and Russia agreed on a plan to bring Syrian chemical weapons under international control in order to avoid military strikes. 
But Obama said Iran should not interpret the diplomatic response — coming after he threatened to use strikes -- as suggesting that the United States wouldn’t attack Iran to stop the development of nuclear weapons. 
“I think what the Iranians understand is that the nuclear issue is a far larger issue for us than the chemical weapons issue, that the threat. . . against Israel, that a nuclear Iran poses, is much closer to our core interests,” Obama said. “My suspicion is that the Iranians recognize they shouldn’t draw a lesson that we haven’t struck [Syria] to think we won’t strike Iran.” 
Obama said, however, that what the Iranians should draw from this episode is that it is possible to resolve this type of disagreement diplomatically. 
“My view is that if you have both a credible threat of force, combined with a rigorous diplomatic effort, that, in fact you can you can strike a deal,” he said, confirming that he had communicated with new Iranian President Hasan Rouhani by letter.

2 comments:

WC said...

"Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Blow me a kiss, pussycat," replied Iran.

Charles Martel said...

All this could have been averted should BHO acted in the 2009 Green revolution. Instead he sided with the Ahmadinejad forces, and here we are now.

He feels now the need to compete with the former KGB agent ... Great! There is nothing like statesmanship in a leader ...