Sunday, December 01, 2013

Children Under 2 Years of Age Not Covered By Obamacare?



Seriously? ATFKM?

From the New York Post:
Kelly, 41, and his wife, Jennifer, 42, are self-employed and have always had to buy their own insurance. Kelly runs a title insurance business in Westhampton, and his wife is a pediatrician in private practice in Miller Place. 
“I initially went on with a lot of optimism,” he said. Kelly said none of the plans offered out-of-network coverage, which was something he wanted. But even worse, they only covered his three older children, who are 3, 5 and 6. 
When Kelly called a representative, he was told his daughter had to be 2 before she could be covered under a family plan. He would have to buy a separate plan for her, at monthly premiums that ranged between $117.21 and $369.31. 
The cost would be on top of a family plan with premiums ranging from $810.84 to $2,554.71 a month. 
Kelly said he had been paying about $1,000 a month. Unwilling to put his daughter on a separate policy, Kelly found a family plan in the private marketplace for about $1,250 a month.
Remember, "children" up to 26 years of age are covered by Obamacare? But babies aren't?

Are they trying to give us a hint? They don't want anymore babies?

WTF?

4 comments:

Ciccio said...

Possibly in anticipation of the new abortion laws - legal until 33 month after conception.

Pastorius said...

That's a frightening thought. I tend to think we're further away from such malevolent machinations here in the U.S. than in Europe.

But who knows with Obama as President?

Charles Martel said...

They don't want any more babies?
Answer: probably not if they are Caucasian ...

Remember, the Ummah has to be supreme!

Epaminondas said...

Neither is anyone who makes LESS than 15k a year in 34 states.
The entire structure?
2700 pages, in the law spawning more that 10k new pages of regs and no one thinks of these things?