Writing in The Washington Post, former
Johnson domestic policy aide Joseph Califano criticized filmmaker
DuVernay for ignoring history, and particularly for suggesting that
Johnson set the FBI to investigate King.
“Selma was LBJ’s idea,” Califano wrote. “He considered the
Voting Rights Act his greatest legislative achievement, he viewed King
as an essential partner in getting it enacted — and he didn’t use the FBI to disparage him.”
One of the central themes of a movie rumored to be awarded with
an avalanche of awards is the ‘bad’ LBJ, whom history records as the
liberal icon of all time.
The civil rights legislation of 1965, Medicare, and the Great Society legislation give the LIE to the smear job.
Califano cited a transcript of a phone call two months before the
marches in which Johnson urged King to generate white political support
for a voting rights bill by seeking out “the worst condition that you
run into” in the South. He said that Johnson wanted images of racist
brutality widely circulated in the news media, which the film depicts as
King’s strategy. He noted J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI, not Johnson,
investigated King though the latter tried to discredit King in a
scathing letter recently posted by the New York Times.
Julian Bond, a civil rights leader who worked with King, praised
“Selma” but took issue with Johnson’s depiction as an obstacle to
progress.
That Bond praises a movie whose major point is UNTRUTH between the
races at the pointy end of the sword tells us all we need to understand
about the power of the lie, and the danger to an American society which
paid with 360,000 Union Lives ( a number which equates to nearly 4
MILLION TODAY) to kill slavery, and saw the KKK emerge to be political
power and NOW has become a joke representing IGNORANT LACK OF EDUCATION,
all the while seeing a unified population in demanding each person here
get EQUAL OPPORTUNITY.
I cannot tell you the way I am, as someone who WORKED voter
registration tables after the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act,
instantly SHUT OFF when I hear this crap, or that Eric Garner’s tragic
and CRIMINAL (IMHO) death is part of a racial divide here.
Truth is not arguable. Those who attempt to argue by the emotion of a
movie that the sky is green, deserve our excoriation and isolation, not
an AWARD.
We have made a lot of mistakes here trying to GOVERN OURSELVES, but we PAY ATTENTION to injustice.
In THIS case injustice is being done to REALITY and HISTORY.
The inevitable result of such events will mean the OPPOSITE of what
those who make a movie like Selma want. The division and grievance
incurred on BOTH SIDES will exacerbate every division there, and find a
new set cracks to exacerbate where none existed as the weak minded
accept as fact, that which is fiction to make rich, the immoral.
3 comments:
I agree with you 100%, but could you please explain this phrase?
"... danger to an American society which paid with 360,000 Union Lives ( a number which equates to nearly 4 MILLION TODAY)..."
How do 360,000 lives in the 1860s equate nearly 4 million today?
To answer for Epa who has not answered yet:
4 million deaths today would be the same percentage of the population that 360,000 was in the 1860's.
Epa,
Have you ever read Malcolm X's autobiography?
Malcolm X hated LBJ and he really hated the Great Society legislation.
Malcolm suspected the Great Society legislation was enacted to take away the initiative of the black peoples by getting them addicted to the government teat, so they could be controlled and further subjugated.
My suspicion on why the folks who made Selma portrayed LBJ the way they did is this:
Malcolm has come out the true hero of the Social Justice crowd. However, since they are so stupid when it comes to history they have separated Malcolm's loathing of LBJ from his reason for that loathing.
In other words, the Selma movie hates LBJ because Malcolm hated LBJ and they are down with Malcolm. But they are not down with Malcolm's reason for hating LBJ because they simply can not GROK it.
Post a Comment