Tuesday, January 08, 2019

The Next Big Church Scandal Is Coming And Its Victims Number In The Hundreds Of Millions

'As bad as the first scandal is, the second will be even larger. The victims will number not in the tens of thousands, but in the tens of millions. 
'The largest persecution of Christians in history is now underway, yet Church leaders have little if anything to say about the slaughter. Instead they have covered-up for Islam's murderous ideology, declaring it to be a religion of peace and justice. 
'Meanwhile, waves of Muslim migrants – most of them men – are bringing unprecedented rates of crime to Europe. One result is a dramatic increase in rapes, with tens of thousands of victims in England and Sweden alone. 
But once again, Church leaders have fallen silent. They rarely acknowledge the victims, but never miss an opportunity to remind endangered Europeans of their duty to admit even more migrants from cultures that are misogynistic, and violent...'
GO READ THE WHOLE THING.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The following tweet leads to an extraordinary essay - very long but worth every syllable - bookmark worthy and highly recommended:

Brazil's new foreign minister @ernestofaraujo lays out a profound philosophical base for democratic nationalism and populism in defense of Western civilization. His 2017 article is translated here for the first time. https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2019/01/07/brazils-new-foreign-minister-gives-profound-philosophical-base-to-trumpian-populism/ … … @jairbolsonaro
https://twitter.com/JMichaelWaller/status/1082398777745555456

A couple of brief quotes from the essay:

===>"There is no real outside enemy: the enemy is self-neglect. The postmodern West is a West that does not want to look at itself. It has a strong impulse to question itself, and sometimes even enjoys replacing its own culture with the culture of non-Western immigrants arriving in increasing numbers. It doesn’t do so because it is altruistic, nor because it has compassion or tolerance – which are just a façade: at heart the West has opened up the floodgates for millions of immigrants because it is in self-rejection, because it is suffering psychically. Trump wants to stop this self-destructive impulse from advancing."<===
&
===>"The post-modern West that was the result of all meanings being deconstructed is also a politically-correct West where meanings are imposed, taboos are established, and thought is set in stone. The West was born questioning the meaning of words, but it has given up lately. If Socrates were to show up today and, using his famous approach, were to start asking “what is racism?”; “what is social justice?”; “what are human rights?”; “what is a right?”; “what is human?”; and were he to reveal how intellectually senseless and superficial these and other concepts were, he would once again be condemned to drink hemlock."<===

Anonymous said...

As I continue to read this lengthy essay, I cannot help but want to share these gems to quote:
===>"Take “diversity,” for example. It’s often said that Africa’s problems – civil wars, coups d’état, massacres, and instability – are as a result of the artificially-created colonial borders the independent African countries inherited, borders that brought together several rival ethnic groups under one state. Underlying that interpretation, which is so common among well-meaning people, is the assumption that ethnic diversity within a country thus triggers the most serious conflicts. An obvious corollary is that African borders should, ideally, be redrawn along ethnic lines, avoiding diversity within the same country. However, the same well-thinking people go to extremes to promote diversity in Western countries, arguing that not only is it a moral duty but also that, given its supposed benefits, saying that the diversity provided by immigration stimulates intellectual advancement, cultural output, and the economy. Quite interesting. The only way to rationally explain this reverse sign of diversity – bad in Africa, good in the United States or in Europe – is to assume that certain people have the capacity to live with diversity while others do not. Such an explanation would, of course, be met with rejection by an outraged dominant ideology. How, then, do they explain it? They don’t. They remain double-minded, the Stalinist logic, whereby 2 + 2 is sometimes 5, is sometimes 3, depending on what is politically-expedient. “Diversity’ is thus explained as a concept that is not rational, nor searchable, nor can be inquired into, but merely a slogan, a brick you throw into a window you want to break, rather than a brick to be used, along with other bricks, to construct a building of logical thinking."<===

Drake's Place said...

I didn't see an email address or way to contact you other than in comments. I rarely "plug" anything I write, but you may want to take a look at this:

https://daviddrakesplace.blogspot.com/2019/01/ten-men-accused-of-sexually-abusing-two.html

Keep up the great work.