9/11 MOSQUE IMAM BOASTS, "Obama's historic speech in Egypt came from me!"


UPDATED AND BUMPED TO THE TOP FOR NOW - SCROLL DOWN FOR NEWER POSTS

Image from Time Magazine

Pamela comments:

One might think that Imam Feisal was merely showing off to the Arab media: the braggadocio of a conceited megalomaniacal man with delusions of grandeur -- so grand, in fact, that he intends to build of mega mosque on the thousands of graves of innocent Americans slaughtered in the largest Islamic attack (or any attack for that matter) on American soil.

But it is not braggadocio. In audio tapes I am currently reviewing, Imam Rauf's power reach is at the highest levels imaginable. He is a grand jihadist, a master classman, operating at the apex of power. The "blueprint" Imam Rauf refers to, is essentially the US MUSLIM ENGAGEMENT -- Changing the Course", This is a large-scale effort by the US government to open areas of cooperation (dhimmitude) with the Islamic world in the political, cultural and economic spheres. 

Pamela is right. And, if you think about it, what we are seeing here, on the part of the Obama Administration and the State Dept., is the Amerabia Project; the equivalent of the Eurabia Project (the Euro-Arab Dialogue) which Bat Ye'or writes of in her important work, Eurabia.


How is it that our government has decided that America needs to be Islamicized/Arabized? What is the theory behind this movement? Is this Amerabia Project merely "reaching out" to our enemies?  Or is it the appeasement of our enemies by giving away what belongs to us; our land, our nation, our culture, our dignity?

The fact of the matter is, we are at war with Jihadist Muslims, Muslims who rightly believe the Koran tells them to convert or kill Infidels until Allah's Kingdom is established across the face of the Earth. This does not mean we are at war with all Muslims, but it does mean that all Muslims, who will not renounce Jihad against the Infidel, are at war with us.


I will repeat that, ALL MUSLIMS WHO WILL NOT RENOUNCE JIHAD AGAINST THE INFIDEL ARE AT WAR WITH US.


We can't avoid this. If another entity, or nation, or people, declare they want to kill you, you can not simply wish away reality. You can not stop someone from wanting to kill you by imagining a world where their murderous thoughts do not exist.


Children get the worlds of Wish/Imagination and Reality mixed up. Adults are supposed to grow out of such thinking.


Our State Department, our Executive Administration, and our de facto State Media (see the Time Magazine Image above), have not grown up. They are children. They still believe that, if we would only reach out, with an "unclenched fist", to our would-be murderers, they would stop wanting to kill us, stop wanting to destroy our civilization.


And, our government seems willing to give away our civilization so that Muslims will not kill us.


We are the Sudetenland. 

Our government is in the beginning stages of planning to force the American people to cede it's very culture in order to appease Muslims.


At least Neville Chamberlain only gave away OTHER people's land. He was not so stupid as to insist the British people actually give away their own nation and culture.

Can you imagine if Roosevelt had proposed the idea of winning World War II Nazifying America? Can you imagine if Churchill had sought Goebbels help in writing his speeches?


When a government begins to turn against it's people in this manner, when it ceases to work for our interests, then we are back to where this nation started; Taxation without Representation.


It may be true that our government believes it is doing the right thing. They may believe reaching out to the Islamic world will help, eventually, to bring about peace.


But, this is an absolutely unproven strategy in the annals of war. And, we have not approved this strategy. 

In fact, the American people are making it clear that we absolutely disapprove of this strategy. 


The faultline manifesting this disapproval is the Ground Zero Mosque. We will not provide such an accommodation to Muslims on the graveyard of our own battlefield. If our government will not recognize the will of the people, then it is our government that is in trouble, not the people. 


We will not be moved. We will not provide sustenance to our enemies. We will not let our government become our slavemasters. We will not become the serfs of our own property. 


We own ourselves, and we own our government. And, it is time for our Representatives to understand that, or get out.


So, for now, the message to our pathetic and wayward Representatives is, we will meet you on hallowed ground. You have the choice to stand with us, or stand against us. The choice is yours.

QUESTION: So who really was speaking on that historic day of June 4th 2009 in Cairo, Egypt? President Obama or the Imam of the proposed Ground Zero Mosque, Feisal Abdul Rauf?

ANSWER: Feisal Abdul Rauf! (Link to audio excerpt of Raul interview at bottom of page)

The Shoebat Foundation has obtained a shocking audio recording of Rauf's own voice boasting in Arabic that Obama’s historic speech in Cairo was provided by the Imam's work with the Cordova Initiative in what the Imam called “The Blue Print” which, according to him, was the solution to the Islamic-American divide. Rauf claimed that Chapter 6 of the Imam’s work engineered by the Cordova Initiative was the construct for the entire speech:

“This is an example of the impact of our work in a positive way to be used by the President.”

"The blue print," Rauf elaborated, included everything from U.S. policy to Jewish and Christian relations with Muslims.

For an Imam in New York to be involved in the orchestrating U.S. foreign policy is quite the claim. In the recording dated February 5th, 2010 Rauf boasted that:

“We have to look at it [as] how to engineer solutions. At the Cordova Initiative we think of ourselves as an engineering shop. Yes. We have an analytical approach. Our work has been that. IN THE BOOK CHAPTER 6, I WROTE ABOUT THIS BLUE PRINT as to WHAT HAS TO BE DONE BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, what has to be done by the Jewish community, what has to be done by the Christian community, what has to be done by the Muslim community, what has to be done by educators, what has to be done by the media. For example, IN MY BOOK IN THE ARABIC VERSION page 293, what did I write? WHAT ARE THE THINGS THAT THE UNITED STATES NEEDS TO DO. IF YOU EXAMINE THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL FIND THAT THE OBAMA SPEECH IN CAIRO WAS ALL TAKEN FROM THIS SECTION [Section 6]. When you do a job that is very complicated. You ask yourself, what have you accomplished. All these problems can be solved but requires the will to solve it. It requires political will, resources and the right focus. The signs of how to go to the moon was known 200 years ago, but the political will and financial will for it happened during 1960-1961. When John Kennedy said that we will send an American to the moon before the end of the 60’s, he established the financial resources and the political will.”

The story was even collaborated in a written article in an interview with Hani Al-Waziri of Egypt. The clue was revealed while Rauf was answering a question regarding President Barack Obama’s speech in which Rauf replied:

“The speech was wonderful and wise in his choice of words, the Prime Minister of Malaysia after the speech disclosed to me that it is now easy for any president of a Muslim country to establish good relations with America, and I AM NOT GOING TO HIDE FROM YOU THAT ONE OF THOSE WHO PARTICIPATED IN WRITING THE SPEECH, TRANSFERRED ENTIRE PARTS OF MY BOOK ‘A NEW VISION FOR MUSLIMS AND THE WEST’, which he referred to U.S. interests being compatible with top interests of the Muslim world”.

Rauf did not disclose the name of this speechwriter that included Rauf’s work in president Obama’s historic address to the Muslim world. It is crucial to note that the Arabic version of Feisal Abdul Rauf’s book was published in Malaysia titled “A CALL TO PRAYER, FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER RUBBLE: ISLAMIC DAWA (SUMMONS TO ISLAM) IN THE HEART OF AMERICA POST-9/11."

Go read the whole thing.

Victor Davis Hanson On Imam Rauf

PASTORIUS CUTTING IN ON ALWAYS ON WATCH'S POST:

Victor Davis Hanson brilliantly sums up the situation for anyone who might think American condemnation of the Mosque epitomizes "American bigotry". Check this out:

Note that the world is not talking about banning the burqa in France, or shutting down a mosque in Germany. Much less are we familiar with the Russians leveling Muslim Grozny or the Chinese rounding up and jailing or shooting Muslims. And, of course, few care that the Saudis, whether the public or the government, would jail a Christian who built a church in Riyadh, or kill a nonbeliever who tried to enter Mecca. 

No, the world is not talking about all those issues. Instead, the world is looking to America, simultaneously to condemn and to emulate. The rest of the world does not know what to do in the face of the Hydra-headed Islamic beast. America, along with nations like Denmark and Israel, is attempting to deal with the situation on largest scale of basic principles, rather than on a piecemeal issue by issue basis.

(With a hat tip to Cube)

From National Review Online:

The Cynical Brilliance of Imam Rauf

Almost everything about the proposed Ground Zero mosque was cynically brilliant.

Start with the notion of a “Cordoba Initiative.” In the elite modern Western mind, Cordoba has been transmogrified into a mythical Lala Land of interfaith tolerance. To invoke the city is to prove one’s ecumenical credentials. Just ask our president, who, in his June 2009 Cairo speech, fantastically claimed that the Muslim city taught us tolerance while Christians were launching the Inquisition (1478) — quite a feat two and a half centuries after most of the Muslims of Cordoba had fled, converted, or been cleansed during the city’s fall (1236) to the Christian forces of the Reconquista. But no matter, we got the president’s drift about who was supposedly tolerant and who was not.

In truth, apart from a brief cultural renaissance, Cordoba, during its five centuries of Islamic rule, was not especially tolerant of nonbelievers. And, like most medieval cities, it was plagued by coups, assassinations, and right-wing clerical intolerance; it was a place where books were both burned and written. But that is not the point of citing Cordoba. Surely Feisal Abdul Rauf knows all that and more: Cordoba is as much a mythical construct of a long-ago multicultural paradise so dear to elite liberals as it is a fantasy rallying cry to Islamists to reclaim the lost Al-Andalus.

So Cordoba is a two-birds-with-one-stone evocation: in the liberal West proof of one’s ecumenical bona fides; in the Middle East proof of one’s Islamist bona fides. It would be easy to find a city emblematic of interfaith outreach other than the Andalusian Cordoba — from Jerusalem to Ann Arbor — but then the irony would be lost.

Then we come to Imam Rauf himself. To his liberal defenders, he is a sort of respectable Deepak Chopra who at respectable places like Aspen mouths pop platitudes of interfaith tolerance — so much so that our own State Department has employed him, apparently for quite some time, for goodwill gallivanting abroad.

But to those in the Middle East, he is known equally well for doing what he can, as a Western liberal, to contextualize terrorism, bin Laden, and Islamic extremism within the tired Western postmodern tropes of cultural relativism...

An excellent essay! Read the whole thing HERE. Worth your time.

The Fix Was In

Ground Zero Mosque gets green light

. . . by a vote of 9-0.

Culturist 9 - 11 Ground Zero "Cordoba House" Mosque Protest Video

On May 25th, 2010 we battled with the Lower Manhattan, Community Board 1 meeting over the building of a Mega - Mosque at Ground Zero ! What our speakers and the commission failed to recognize is that Islam is not just another benign multicultural reason to celebrate diversity. This mosque is a flag of conquest. It is an insult added to injury. It will stir pride in Jihadis all over the world.