Monday, September 17, 2007

Even the Telegraph UK, says we are 'starting' a war. Vestiges of appeasement thinking?

Well I have been saying the same thing for YEARS now.

  1. Iran IS developing nuclear weapons
  2. Iran cannot be deterred from doing this, since it is a national mission by anything but force of arms
  3. Iran will do anything and everything to fulfill this mission because it IS the national priority
  4. The USA and or Israel because of what every single Iranian leader has been saying since 1979, and their actions since 1979.
  5. If Iran cannot be stopped by negotiations, there WILL be war.
  6. Underlying this process lies the problem .. the mullahs believe they are on a mission from God can cannot be deterred from using nuclear weapons against 'shaitan'

Bush setting America up for war with Iran


By Philip Sherwell in New York and Tim Shipman in Washington
Last Updated: 2:29am BST 17/09/2007

Senior American intelligence and defence officials believe that President George W Bush and his inner circle are taking steps to place America on the path to war with Iran, The Sunday Telegraph has learnt.

Pentagon planners have developed a list of up to 2,000 bombing targets in Iran, amid growing fears among serving officers that diplomatic efforts to slow Iran's nuclear weapons programme are doomed to fail.

wiran116abig.gif

Pentagon and CIA officers say they believe that the White House has begun a carefully calibrated programme of escalation that could lead to a military showdown with Iran.

Now it has emerged that Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, who has been pushing for a diplomatic solution, is prepared to settle her differences with Vice-President Dick Cheney and sanction military action.

In a chilling scenario of how war might come, a senior intelligence officer warned that public denunciation of Iranian meddling in Iraq - arming and training militants - would lead to cross border raids on Iranian training camps and bomb factories.

A prime target would be the Fajr base run by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Quds Force in southern Iran, where Western intelligence agencies say armour-piercing projectiles used against British and US troops are manufactured.

Under the theory - which is gaining credence in Washington security circles - US action would provoke a major Iranian response, perhaps in the form of moves to cut off Gulf oil supplies, providing a trigger for air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities and even its armed forces.

Senior officials believe Mr Bush's inner circle has decided he does not want to leave office without first ensuring that Iran is not capable of developing a nuclear weapon.

The intelligence source said: "No one outside that tight circle knows what is going to happen." But he said that within the CIA "many if not most officials believe that diplomacy is failing" and that "top Pentagon brass believes the same".

He said: "A strike will probably follow a gradual escalation. Over the next few weeks and months the US will build tensions and evidence around Iranian activities in Iraq."

Previously, accusations that Mr Bush was set on war with Iran have come almost entirely from his critics.

kabuki2.jpgWhy is it that the perception is that WE are set on war, when we have been following along with both negotiations and sanctions? Why is that we did not then attack when it would have been easier?

Even more important, why is the Bush admin about to repeat the EXACT SAME ERROR over the CAUSE of war they made in 2002 and 2003 in Iraq. JUST SAY IT, GEORGE. SAY IT

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

A full report here