OUR ULTIMATE AIM TO ERADICATE ISLAM’S DECEPTION CAN BE SUMMED UP AS: DEMOLISHING THE BEAST.
We won't focus on the symptoms here; here we’ll deal with the roots. We are dedicated and committed to our unequivocal agenda for banning the Koran and declaring it illegal in America and western countries.
For those of little faith we tell them: It will happen. Sad to say it, but Islamic terror is our most trusted ally to make it happen. If one thing you can trust to be true to itself and bet the farm on it, that would be Islam.
In case you don’t know it, a big chunk of the Koran’s teaching are already self-censored and de facto banned in western countries. Mosques are already being monitored. We just have to make it official.
We lived with Muslims for more than 1400 years. I should say, rather, we suffered Islam's evil and destruction and we still do. We were born and raised in the Arabic language. No one on earth knows Islam and its mentality better than we do. Not Even the highest Islamic authorities of Egypt or Saudi Arabia. Actually they don’t know where to hide right now, neither from our Questioning Islam show, nor from the pressure of their own populations asking them to confront us and refute what we say. But how can they, It’s all from their books.
What we intend to do:
We will completely blow away the barrier of the Arabic language for Americans and westerners. We will lay down front of your eyes the proof, from none other than Mohamed himself in the Koran, that he founded Islam for the sole purpose of abducting and raping women (especially blondes) and looting other populations. Which will explain the Jeziah (blood money) and Mohamed’s admission “Allah made my earnings under the shadow of my sword.”
If that’s the role model they strive to imitate, any wonder why Arabs never produced anything and always depended on others for their living.
We will expose Islam from a totally new angle that will be a first for an English audience site and go in depth till we reach the bottom (of Islam). This time it’s not going to be Islam under the veil. We’ll take the veil off to show you not only a topless and bottomless Islam, but we’ll allow you to penetrate it and get the inside out. On the way, fasten your seat belts, for you’re about to feel the tremors of the wildest ride through the dirt of Islam go way beyond Richter’s shock magnitude scale.
We'll prove exclusively from their most “holy books “that if prostitution had a religion, it would be Islam.
20 comments:
The revised koran sounds interesting with one caveat. How will this revision relate to the sira and hadith?
The Hadith did not come from God.
Ok . . .what about the sira?
The Hadith did not come from God . . .yet the Hadith IS the record of all things done, said and omitted by their prophet Muhammad, uswa hasana, al-insan al-kamil,the exemplary model of conduct for ALL time.
How do you separate Muhammad from the receiver of the words for the koran?
In Islamic tradition Muhammad is al-insan al-kamil, the perfect man, and uswa hasana, an excellent model of conduct (Qur’an 33:21)
How do you challenge this?
If you want us to answer your questions, stop posting as anonymous.
Muslims Against Sharia,
I like you guys, but I gotta say, it seems to me it would be easy enough to just answer the guys question.
The Hadith are stories about Mohammed which were told by imperfect human beings. That's why there strong and weak Hadith. The weak ones are the ones you are not too sure about, probably because they do not correspond with other information you know about Mohammed.
So, if I am right, then what was so hard about that? You don't need a name to answer a question like that.
I don't get it.
Pastorius,
You're right, it would be. However, from our experience answering questions that come from anonymous posters posters is a waste of time; most of them are not looking for answers.
Gotcha. So, you think he is just looking to start a fight, huh?
Could be.
We have a lot of anonymous contributors around here. But, we also have a lot of anonymous idiots as well.
:)
Gotcha. So, you think he is just looking to start a fight, huh?
Could be.
We have a lot of anonymous contributors around here. But, we also have a lot of anonymous idiots as well.
:)
Ah yes, you occupy that compfortable middle ground.
:)
I'm somewhat familiar with that myself.
Muslims and lefties call me a Nazi, a racist, and a hater,
and the Right-wingers call me a self-hating white man.
Muslims against Sharia & Pastorius -
I prefer anonymity as I am unfamiliar with you as well. If this is problematic, the option to post anonymously should be eliminated.
I neither want to provoke or antagonize. There is much to learn on the web and I am neither a muslim nor phobic of muslims.
I do not like what I have learned about Sharia, and having read the Koran, I find it's content difficult and incredibly disturbing. Since I do not read arabic perhaps the poetic tone is lost on me, but what can be poetic about 'strike them at their necks' and describing non-believers as monkeys and pigs?
I've read that those questioning such things are considered taking material out of context. In what context is that acceptable in?
Then I've read that the koran cannot be interpretted without considering the hadith (btw, good answer Pastorius) and the sira.
If both those references are dismissed and the koran is adjusted to remove all the violence - your effort sounds promising and I encourage you, but I am not a muslim and it is not up to me.
What is up to me is the right to choose for myself. Based on the law of the land, I, as a citizen EQUAL to ALL others, am protected by a set of secular laws which have been viewed antagonistic when it interferes with Islamic dawa.
Muslims without sharia have an admirable mission. I wish it much success, so long as in the end we all agree that in America, WE (men and women) ARE ALL EQUAL in the eyes of God and under secular law.
I wish you all well and will continue to follow this as I too hope and pray that we can avoid what appears to be an inevitable clash of civilizations - as depicted in Islam - dar al islam vs. dar al harb.
Anonymous,
You said: "but I am not a muslim and it is not up to me."
I say: Yes, that's the problem. We can support the effort, but we are not Muslims. It is up to Muslims to define Islam.
However, if there are Muslims who want to make things better I think we ought to support them. That's why I support Muslims Against Sharia.
Anonymous, it would help you to know that any Muslim who says he is "against Sharia" sets himself up to be killed, so the guys who have started this effort are laying it on the line.
By the way, our Christian Bible calls for death to apostates, adulterers and homosexuals, and yet we have been able to move beyond that, so it is hard for me believe that Muslims couldn't also move, through a similar process, towards a more peaceful Islam.
Muslims Against Sharia,
Have you studied the Talmud? As far as I can tell, it was the Talmudic process which moved Judaism (and thus Christianity as well) beyond the violence of its early stages.
Pastorius,
"Have you studied the Talmud?"
No.
I certainly am no expert. However, this is what I understand. The Talmud is a series of arguments about how to apply Jewish Law (from the Bible) to various situations.
The compilation of the Talmud took centuries and many Rabbis participated in the "arguments" over the course of centuries.
Gradually, the Talmudic process moved Jewish law from being the hard legalistic corpus it started out as, to be a corpus which was more organic, living, breathing and forgiving.
From what I understand, some of Jesus' teachings were inspired by the Talmud. In fact, as I understand it, when Jesus was asked which law was most important and he replied, "love the Lord God with all your heart, mind, and soul, and love thy neighbor as yourself, he was repeating a passage from the Talmud.
Anyway, it seems to me the process of ifJihad is similar to the Talmudic process of arriving at new interpretation through argumentation. It also seems to me that ijma (consensus) is compatible with Democracy.
The question becomes, then, why is it that I, a non-Muslim, sees that these ideas are gateways to change, yet the Ummah does not?
What do you think the answer is to that question?
"The question becomes, then, why is it that I, a non-Muslim, sees that these ideas are gateways to change, yet the Ummah does not?"
In short, the Ummah is brainwashed and free thought is not encouraged. The Koran is perfect, therefore self-criticism is a taboo. Those, who break out of the yoke of herd mentality are branded apostates. The Ulemma (clergy) is perfectly content with the status quo, so no call for change will come from it.
Then, it's up to people like you.
Your endeavor could truly heal the world.
it's so sad what I've read here..Islam is sharia so how can u be against sharia ? God was describing the unbelievers as monkeys and pigs..well you should learn arabic first..don't concentrate on the tone..it has alot of meanings.. and god was describing those who disobeyed and killed his messengers and asked for miracles though they remained unbelievers..obviously you have only read the description..
All I'm asking you people is to just learn arabic and koran from it's original source..and if you don't want to then don't judge..
muslims were asked to respect all the other religions so please don't disrespect it..
what I've read here shows you have no idea of what Islam is..It's the 21st century and still Islamic countries exist..so somethin's gotta be right about it for millions of people to embrace it..not just arabs but I've met people from america, europe, australia, canada and alot more..
اللهم سخرني لنصرة الإسلام ولا تجعل كلمة الذين ظلموا أنفسهم فوق كلمتك يا أرحم الراحمين
"Islam is sharia so how can u be against sharia ?"
This claim is just as dumb as the claim that Christianity is the Inquisition.
"All I'm asking you people is to just learn arabic and koran from it's original source"
I read the Koran in three languages, but not in Arabic. Do you expect me to believe that the Koran was identically mistranslated into three languages?
"It's the 21st century and still Islamic countries exist..so somethin's gotta be right about it for millions of people to embrace it"
It is the 21 century and majority of today's regimes are totalitarian. Hundreds of thousands of people being slaughtered every year in religious conflicts, usually involving Muslims. I guess something's gotta be right about that too.
Post a Comment