Tuesday, September 02, 2008

The descent

She's unprepared
She's just a face
She's no substitute for Hillary
She's against gays
She's against abortion
She's responsible for her child's damage
She's faked her own pregnancy
She's guilty of abuse of power
She's got a husband with a DUI 22 years ago
She's a shitty mom, her daughter's pregnant
She's really a confederate
She's a Buchanan freak, all you juze
She'll be a shitty mom, if she's elected
She'll be a shitty VP if she's not a shitty mom
She hired a lawyer (intake of breath on the left) for her abuse of power
She's never really been vetted

Mrs palin Goes to Washington.jpg

NAKED FEAR has never been more visible.





16 comments:

Anonymous said...

«She´s no substitute for Hillary»


SO WHY DIDN´T YOU VOTE FOR HILLARY?????????????????!!!!!!!

Epaminondas said...

HUH?

What point do you think I am trying to make, or can't you discern SARCASM?

Pastorius said...

Epa,

I don't know if you have yet taken notice of this odd phenomenon, but keep a watch out for it.

The topic of Sarah Palin somehow has the ability to turn normally intelligent people into zombie-like creatures lacking in any sense of irony or ability to discern sarcasm.

It's a very strange phenomenon. I wonder what Palin thinks of it, considering she goes around dressing like a Librarian Fantasy all the time.

Damien said...

Pastorius,

Maybe its because she dresses like a Librarian Fantasy all the time?

- : )

Anonymous said...

Epaminondas,
I was not talking to you.

Epaminondas said...

Anon,,, I see.

Pasto...I've really been amazed as some people I think of as friends went totally around the bend on this, ESPECIALLY now that the AIP thing turns out to be bogus...here's what I just got from a friend who I sent the pdf link showing Palin was a republican since 1982 .."That doesn't mean she isn't or wasn't a fellow traveler. But she's awful anyway, and is against my interests. You can have her and all of the right wingnuts."

But I know just how to aggravate these folks.

Pastorius said...

I still don't feel I know much about Sarah Palin, but I have a feeling that anyone who provokes such dislike from so many people across the spectrum, must be either a great human, or totally dangerous.

I see no evidence of her being dangerous, however.

So, I guess that leaves me with one choice.

Hell, if you look at the headlines going around these days, one would think Palin is the one running for President. I don't recall ever hearing so much about a VP. Although, yes, a lot of people did focus on Cheney.

Anonymous said...

It's so true - due to current msm bias and lack of journalistic ethics (is there such a thing?), we know more about Palin in the last few days than we will ever know about the annointed one.

Including her SS#

Pastorius said...

What would the media do if Repubs released Obama's SS#?

Natasha said...

She's not liked because,

not just her anti-abortion but her anti-BIRTH CONTROL and EXTREME VIEWS ON CONTROLLING WOMEN and THATS what the uproar is about within the feminists camp

that IS divided, because Obama too, threw Planned Parenthood under the bus,

and Those in the Obama [and not Obama] camp are reacting, sure,

for Good reason however, at this moment Bush is signing new draft that states, ALL BIRTH CONTROL IS ABORTION,

IF, If Roe is overturned, it will NOT only ban abortion, it will also ban birth control AND FORCE THOUSANDS TO BE PREGNANT,

WHICH FINE,

WHO'S GOING TO PAY FOR IT?

YOU?

THE REPUBLICANS?

OH HELL NO, you see because THEN, everything you hear towards Palin

IS WHAT WOMEN WITH CHILDREN HAVE BEEN HEARING FROM THE RIGHT WING IN THIS COUNTRY FOR YEARS

SOME EXAMPLES

get a job you lazy bitch
oh you work you bad mother
you shouldn't have sex slut
oh you're a prude and a man hater if you don't put out
oh he left you for a younger woman you must have not been doing him good enough
oh, how dare you demand child support
oh, what, you want child care assistance why you should be HOME with those kids or you shouldn't have HAD kids
oh, what you mean you don't want children thats your 'biological duty'

do you get it?

and Palin works with those agendas,

HAVE THOSE BABIES BUT DON'T COME EXPECTING

FAIR WAGES
CHILD CARE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
CHILD SUPPORT HELP OR ENFORCEMENT
PROTECTION FROM ABUSIVE FATHERS
because

thats your fault SLUT FOR SPREADING YOUR LEGS

MEANWHILE

VIAGRA, ADVERTISED BY MCCAIN

IS PAID FOR BY INSURANCE BECAUSE MEN ARE SOOOO ENTITLED TO FUCK AT 90 YEARS OLD

AND YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE RAGE?

so, babies born, and thrown in trash cans or in front of fire stations,

OH THOSE SLUT HORRIBLE MOTHERS WELL EXPECT MORE OF THAT

and the, well they can give them up for adoption why its NO BIG DEAL, BREEDING MACHINES THAT CAN SPIT THE BABIES OUT AND HAND THEM OVER TO SOME 'RICH' WOMAN AND NOT FEEL ANY REPERCUSSIONS FROM THAT,

then three years down the road that biological mother [and so many cases now being reported of poor mothers WHO WERE COERCED AND THREATENED TO GIVE UP THOSE CHILDREN] want those kids back

and then its a nasty court battle

BOTTOM LINE ITS NOT ABOUT CONCERN OVER CHILDREN ITS ABOUT CONTROL OVER WOMBS AND WOMEN AND ITS NO DAMN DIFFERENT

THAN SAUDI FORCING 8 YEAR OLD GIRLS TO MARRY AND FORCING THEM TO BE PREGNANT

its the same type of misogynist THEOCRACY

and NEVER MIND ALL THE STREET CHILDREN WHO WERE ONCE

FETUSES

IN THIS COUNTRY THAT NO BODY GIVES A DAMN ABOUT...

its all about FORCING THOSE CHILDREN INTO THE WORLD BUT ONCE THEY ARE BORN ITS

TO HELL WITH YOU YOU BASTARD CHILD

we're heading to be like Romania under Nicolai Ceausescu with babies chained to cribs

and they are STILL CLEANING UP THAT MESS OVER THERE

he did that forced pregnancy too

and NEVER FORGET, ONCE GOVERNMENT CAN FORCE PREGNANCY THEY CAN EASILY TAKE IT AWAY LIKE THEY DID CHINA, all it takes is a change in government or change in policy...

My question is, fine, they want mass pregnancies

THEY DAMN SURE BETTER BE READY TO SUPPORT THESE WOMEN AND THESE KIDS...BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO SEE TO IT THAT THEY DO,

AND IF THAT MEANS RAISING TAXES THROUGH THE ROOF

SO BE IT.

Natasha
Director of WAMI

Natasha said...

AND DON'T FORGET,

MEANWHILE, THOSE FORCES WORKING SO HARD TO BAN ABORTION AND BIRTH CONTROL,

A.K.A. THE CATHOLICS

ARE BRINGING OVER MORE AND MORE SOMALIAN HARD CORE ISLAMISTS INTO THIS COUNTRY

THAT ARE DEMANDING SHARIA LAW

[OR HAS TYSON ESCAPED YOU]...

ITS CATHOLIC [ANTI-ABORTION AND ANTI-BIRTH CONTROL] CHARITIES THAT IS PAYING FOR THESE SOMALIAN WORKERS TO COME LIVE

IN THIS COUNTRY AND WHO DEMAND

SHARIA LAWS INCLUDING POLYGAMY AND ITS CATHOLIC CHARITIES WITH THE GOVERNMENT THAT IS BENDING OVER BACKWARDS HELPING THESE MUSLIMS

WHO, GET 'BENEFITS' AND HOUSING AND WELFARE AND GOOD JOBS

SO YOU GODDAMN RIGHT,

IF THEY FORCE PREGNANCIES,

WE WILL SEE TO IT THEY DO THE VERY SAME FOR WOMEN

OR THERE WILL BE WAR.

NATASHA
DIRECTOR OF WAMI

Anonymous said...

«for Good reason however, at this moment Bush is signing new draft that states, ALL BIRTH CONTROL IS ABORTION,»

Wasn´t there too much population in the world?! Aren´t we running out of resources?! Oh my...

«ALL BIRTH CONTROL IS ABORTION»

What a nonsense.

Natasha said...

well thats what the language of the HSS says, and Bush is signing it, for now it will have effects, but the Real danger will be, if they turn Roe, because THATS when birth control as labeled as 'abortion' WILL BE ILLEGAL AND THAT INCLUDES THE PILL...

here you go,

I've been researching this, I years ago worked with FFL [back in my young naive days] and I KNOW what their Extreme agenda is, Palin belongs to that organization...and THEY ARE EXTREME, ALSO THEY DO NOT BELIEVE IN ABORTION EVEN IN CASES OF RAPE, INCEST OR IF THE MOTHER'S LIFE IS IN DANGER...

THEY ARE FETUS FASCISTS...add a veil and they are Just like the women who prop and protect Sharia

on the HSS

While everyone is ‘circle jerking’ between Palin and Obama [and while the Bathory feminists are licking their chops on the peasant blood that will be sacrificed for their ‘new position of kindgom goddess]

thought you Might want to Stock up on your Birth Control ladies

http://www.beaconbroadside.com/broadside/2008/08/redefining-the.html


EXCERPT: Fans of Jewish folklore are familiar with tales from the town of Chelm, the legendary center of foolishness. Chelm’s citizens unfailingly choose actions guaranteed to achieve the opposite of what was desired. The children need more milk? Buy a billy goat! The synagogue needs a new roof? Build a new floor! There has been much about the eight long years of the George W. Bush presidency that has made one think s/he was living in Chelm (remember how we were told the U.S. invasion of Iraq would be greeted by Iraqis bearing flowers and sweets?). Now, in the waning days of this presidency comes a move that would no doubt earn special respect from the people of Chelm because of its tortured logic. Draft regulations now circulating in the Department of Health and Human Services would redefine many forms of contraception (including most birth control pills) as “abortions.”

HERE’S THE LANGUAGE OF THE BILL BEING SIGNED AS WE SPEAK–OR IN THE PROCESS

AND BIRTH CONTROL PILLS WILL BE NOW,

CONSIDERED ‘ABORTION’

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/emailphotos/pdf/HHS-45-CFR.pdf

THIS IS THE DOC OF THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES…THAT PRESIDENT BUSH IS SIGNING BEFORE HE LEAVES OFFICE

AND IF THIS ISN'T BAD ENOUGH,

MORE PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN CUT FOR WOMEN INCLUDING 'MOTHERS' AND CHILDREN

in LA right now there are Tent cities WITH MOTHERS WITH CHILDREN,

that were busted up, these women and children HAVE NO WHERE TO GO

BUT WE'LL PAY WELFARE FOR ISLAMISTS WHO THEN DEMAND SHARIA AND FOOT BATHS UNDER THE HELP OF

CATHOLIC CHARITIES

WHILE LEAVING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN TO STARVE WITH NO HEALTH CARE IN THIS COUNTRY

I'M ENRAGED TO THE POINT WHERE I DON'T CARE ANYMORE, THIS IS TRULY WAR BECAUSE THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT ATTACK ON AMERICAN WOMEN

UNDER CONSERVATIVISM

AND THOSE WHO SUPPORTED HILARY, I'M FINDING WERE NOT SO MUCH FOR WOMEN'S ISSUES AS MUCH AS THEY WERE FOR PROTECTING THEIR 'WEALTH'

Something people against Islam better keep in mind,

THE CHOICE OF PALIN, which was really to lure in the extreme Christian right, but that is being used to pull in those Hilary voters who Don't like Obama,

are FEMINISTS

WHO DARED NOT STAND OPPOSED TO ISLAM OR SHARIA,

THATS the kind of feminism that is supporting Palin from the LEFT SIDE

minus a 'few'

the rest, are lesbians or feminists who are Just pissed at Obama and aren't looking at the entire spectrum...myopic and emotional reactionary thinking...

I've been dealing with them all week and its infuriating, I've never Seen such stupidity in all my life,

or such willingness to pander to the very ones who wanted them off the bus WAY BEFORE OBAMA DID,

but point is, there are right now THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS OF WOMEN WITH CHILDREN, THOSE 'FETUSES' THAT ARE SLOWLY DYING AND SUFFERING IN THIS COUNTRY RIGHT NOW

WHERE'S THE CONCERN FOR ALL THOSE CHILDREN?

not in the Right wing, thats for DAMN sure and not in the Left wing either, BUT THE OUTRAGE,

IS THE MONIES AND WELFARE SPENT ON IMMIGRANTS AND MUSLIMS WHO THEN,

DEMAND SHARIA

AND GET IT....

while they stab in the back the mothers and children IN THIS COUNTRY

no way, no way am I going to SIT on this one.

Natasha

Natasha said...

BTW I don't believe in abortion, but I damn sure don't support GOVERNMENT FORCING PREGNANCIES OR FORCING ABORTIONS

here's an example of just how Ugly it gets when GOVERNMENTS HAVE THAT KIND OF CONTROL

Peru--first it was sterilization, then forced pregnancies, forced sterilizations again, and thousands dying as a result of

Registering pregnancies from the moment of conception was decreed in Communist Romania under the dictatorship of Nicolai Ceausescu, with devastating consequences. Birth control was banned and women were forced to undergo a monthly gynecological examination to detect pregnancies, which were then duly registered. Birth quotas were established and couples were penalized if they did not have children after two years of marriage. The birth rate in Romania quickly doubled. Women began resorting to illegal abortion, and the birthrate soon fell to near its previous level. Unwanted children were left in state orphanages where many perished under appalling conditions. Maternal mortality doubled and gynecological injuries to women who had unsafe abortions also grew, resulting in the involuntary sterilization of 10 percent of Romanian women.

http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/1460

IF we go this course, We don't have programs here either and THOSE WHO INSIST ON CONTROLLING WOMEN DON'T WANT THOSE PROGRAMS AND THEY DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR THEM...

AND WE DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY WITH THE WEALTH TO TAKE IN ALL THESE BABIES BY ADOPTION LIKE THEY DID BACK IN THE FIFTIES

HELL, WE CAN'T EVEN GET PEOPLE TO DO 'FOSTER CARE' IN THIS COUNTRY UNLESS WE PAY THEM OVER A GRAND A MONTH PER CHILD

THATS TAX PAYER DOLLARS

THAT MEANS, STATE ORPHANAGES LIKE ROMANIA HAD

AND THATS WHY I WILL GO TO WAR BECAUSE THAT IS HIDEOUS AND THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT IN THE WEALTHIEST NATION ON EARTH

WHILE THEY SUPPORT THOSE MIGRANTS IN THIS COUNTRY WHO

DEMAND FOOT BATHS, POLYGAMY, WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS

demanding all sorts of things that WE are forced to pay for

but DARE a woman be pregnant and poor

SHE is on her own, tough luck baby

oh, well, THERE'S ALWAYS PROSTITUTION, PIMPING OUT THE KID AND STRIPPING

I HEARD THE BIG THING IN STRIPPING AND GRINDING POLES IS THE WHOLE

LIBRARY FANTASY LOOK.

;)

it is a bit ironic isn't it that CHAUVINISM IN USA MIGHT VERY WELL BE WHAT MAKES ISLAM SOOO MUCH MORE STRONGER IN THIS COUNTRY,

AND EVEN PAID FOR, BY THOSE SAME FORCES

WHO WANT TO PUT WOMEN BACK INTO THE DARK AGES, BAREFOOT, PREGNANT, UNDER THE MALE THUMB

amen amen and allah abkar

Anonymous said...

As Thompson stated, the good old boy network is quaking in their boots about Palin - as they should be. Change is in the air!

She has no fear and is effective at cleaning house. I hope her talents aren't wasted during a McCain tenure.

We know where McCain stands on illegal and insane immigration - think Juan Hernandez. There's reason to fear McCain is of the Chertoff incompetency league re:DHS and he's likely to float in the leaky Richard Armitage boat at State.

Palin strikes me as the Spring cleaning type. A breath of fresh air.

Pastorius said...

Natasha,

You are interesting and I think your comments are worthwhile.

However, as several others commenters have noted, they are extremely long. And, often the length is more in the rant than the information provided.

For instance, in the top one here you claim that the Bush Admin is:

" ... at this moment Bush is signing new draft that states, ALL BIRTH CONTROL IS ABORTION ..."


And yet, you do not provide a link to back up that claim.

I think you are referring to this (from Salon):

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/07/15/abortion/

"The Bush administration wants to require all recipients of aid under federal health programs to certify that they will not refuse to hire nurses and other providers who object to abortion and even certain types of birth control." It is worth restating: The administration wants to ensure that recipients of federal health funding -- including women's clinics -- cannot deny employment based on a refusal to perform abortions or distribute birth control.



THAT IS NOT, AT ALL, THE SAME THING YOU ARE CLAIMING.

Please be more specific, provide links, and do not use language which is merely incendiary. Tell the truth. I don't blame you for being angry (from your point-of-view), but you must admit (as a person who personally opposes abortion yourself) that it is strange that our government funds abortion clinics at all, isn't it?

And, the fact that our government wants it to be clear that those who oppose abortions should not be precluded from working in federally-funded family planning clinics is not the same thing as claiming that ALL BIRTH-CONTROL IS ABORTION.

The article states that a person hired may object to some forms of birth control.

The IUD is an instant abortion machine. That does not mean that I, necessarily, object to the IUD, but I certainly can understand why others do.

Salon goes on to state:

"The proposal classifies abortion as "any of the various procedures -- including the prescription, dispensing and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action -- that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation." That last part is critical because some argue that hormonal birth control and emergency contraception can prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg."

Now, I can see how that would be a problem. But, the thing is, that still is not the same thing as saying that ALL BIRTH-CONTROL IS A PROBLEM.

It sounds to me as if the law the Bush Admin. is proposing is sloppy in its language. That means it needs to be debated and clarified. That's the legislative process. You make it sound like something evil is going on. You are exaggerating.

Get the facts right when you write. Do not lie here. I think you know the truth. You could have stated it better if you were not merely angry and ranting.

Provide us with links to back up your claims.