What media bias II ?

The headline title:

Sarah Palin Installed Tanning Bed at Governor's Mansion

Wow, sounds like a narcissistic lazy person spent taxpayer's money for ridiculous luxury to avoid going down the street to be a narcissistic bimbo, huh?

Except SHE paid for it in a place almost totally dark 5 months a year.
Rebroadcast by US (you remember those Obama-Palin covers, right?) from the NARCO NEWS (? ...Reporting on the Drug Wars in Latin America,.... gringoes!)

Except SHE PAID FOR IT.
USED.

Okay this is great stuff...

Tanning beds can cost up to $35,000 to install in a home - not including the cost of parts, Color Me Tan manager Erin Weise told the Narco News.

Up to? Is like $2,000 included in UP TO?

"I don't think it's normal for people to have a tanning bed in their house, " Wiese, who is based in Fairbanks said. "It's expensive."

Xlation- Palin is weird, and a spendthrift

Palin's running mate, presidential candidate John McCain battled skin cancer in 1993, and again in 2000.

Xlation- Palin is a thrill risk freak

"I coat SPF 30 on myself first thing in the morning, and wear long sleeves and a hat whenever I'm in the sun," McCain has told Newsweek.

Palin declared May 2007, "Skin Cancer Awareness Month." In the press materials it was noted, "Skin cancer is caused, overwhelmingly, by over-exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the sun and from tanning beds.

Xlation - Palin is a hypocrit

I can't wait to vote for the book burning, snake handling, tongue speaking, trooper firing, power abusing, bear killing, moose shooting, sled riding, narcissistic lazy, weird, thrill seeking, baby endangering, bad mothering, hypocrit ... since she is so superior to the other side.

Right now, the vast majority of the American Press is a farce, an embarassing farce.

The story they should be doing is why the democrats have become so deranged, and they have gone along.

Of course, the answer, that they are incensed that not only have a very large % of the american people have rejected their annointing as intellectual chiefs and best "FIRST CITIZENS", and that when they should have been crushing anything named republican, instead are confronted with a potentially new Reagan, who is FEMALE and PRO LIFE, and comes from the people almost direct, is simply too disturbing to the narrative they have constructed for themselves since Nov 1980.