Monday, February 16, 2009

The Beginning of an Islamic Reformation?

I believe it is possible to have a real reformation in Islam. I'm not saying I think it inevitable, or even likely. 

However, there is, within Islam, the concept of Ijma (consensus). The hadith from which it is derived states, "My community will never agree upon an error" is often cited as support for the validity of ijma.

Sunni Muslims regard ijma as the fourth fundamental source of law, after Qur'anSunnah, and qiyas (analogy).

While this concept can be compared to our own Democratic ideal, one has to wonder why it has never led to a true Democratic Islam.

That being said, where such a concept exists as a foundational idea, there is a chance for true reform.

Let's hope these women are on to something.

From the International Herald Tribune:

Women use Koran to demand equal rights

Kuala Lumpur: The religious order banning women from dressing like tomboys was bad enough. But the fatwa by this country's leading clerics against yoga was the last straw.

"They have never even done yoga," said Zainah Anwar, a founder of a Malaysian women's rights group called Sisters in Islam.

Anwar argues that the edict, issued late last year by the National Fatwa Council of Malaysia, is pure patriarchy. Islam, she says, is only a cover.

It was frustrations like those that drew several hundred Muslim women to a conference in this Muslim-majority country over the weekend. Their mission was to come up with ways to demand equal rights for women. And their tools, however unlikely, were the tenets of Islam itself.

"Secular feminism has fulfilled its historical role, but it has nothing more to give us," said Ziba Mir-Hosseini, an Iranian anthropologist who has been helping to formulate some of the arguments. "The challenge we face now is theological."

The advocates came from 47 countries to participate in the project, called Musawah, the Arabic word for equality. They spent the weekend brainstorming and learning the best Islamic arguments to take back to their own societies as defenses against clerics who insist that women's lives are dictated by men's strict interpretations of Islam.

"We are trying to develop a new language, offer it to the world and use it," said Marwa Sharafeldin, an activist from Egypt.


Anwar, the main organizer, said her group was almost alone when she started it 20 years ago, but now it is one of many. "It's a movement whose time has come."

The repression comes not from the Koran, the women argue, but from the human interpretation of it, in the form of Islamic law, which has ossified over the centuries while their globalized lives have galloped ahead. So they are going back to the original text, arguing that its emphasis on justice makes the case for equality.

"Feminist Islamic scholarship is trying to unearth the facts that were there," Mir-Hosseini told a room of eager activists Sunday. "We can't be afraid to look at legal tradition critically."

She referred to the work of Muslim intellectuals, like Nasr Abu Zayd of Egypt and Abdolkarim Soroush of Iran, reformers who argue that the Koran must be read in a historical context, and that laws derived from it can change with the times. Their ideas are controversial, and both are in exile in the West.


Mir-Hosseini argues that Muslim societies are trapped in a battle between two visions of Islam: one legalistic and absolutist that emphasizes the past; the other pluralistic and more inclined toward democracy. She said that in Iran reformers were gaining ground, but that former President George W. Bush's antagonism toward the country ended up strengthening hard-liners there.

Pastorius note: Ah, starting off by blaming the Infidel probably is not a good sign.


"It's really a struggle between two world views," Mir-Hosseini said, adding that time was on the side of the women.

It was the rise of political Islam that brought the women together.

As Malaysia's progressive family laws began to be rolled back in the late 1980s, Anwar and several other women formed a Koran reading group.

"There is an understanding that mullahs know best, that you cannot speak," Anwar said. "Muslim women's groups are coming out to challenge that authority."

Some scholars argued that the effort sounded unrealistic and would have no impact, mainly because it appeared to ignore more than a thousand years of Islamic legal scholarship and practice. Religious authorities are the only ones with the power to interpret laws, and circumventing that well-entrenched system would require replacing it altogether.

"This kind of argument is being made at the margins of the Islamic world," said Bernard Haykel, an expert on Islamic law at Princeton University. "It has shape and form but no substantive content. There's no real way of actually bringing about these changes."


But others made the case that change, though incremental, was happening at the grass-roots level in a number of Muslim societies.

Isobel Coleman, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, who attended the conference, argues that these women's movements are making progress, as girls' education levels increase and the Western world is a click away on satellite television. Women are even taking positions in religious institutions, she said: A woman has headed the Shariah College at Qatar University.

"It's a slow shift," said Coleman, whose book on the topic, "Paradise Beneath Her Feet: Women and Reform in the Middle East," is to be published by Random House in 2010. "It's just beginning to come together as a movement."

There have been some successes. In Morocco, sweeping changes of family law in favor of women went into effect in 2004. Critics argued that it was possible only because the country's king approved it, but Moroccan activists said it never would have happened if they had not spent years lobbying and formulating legal arguments, some of them based on Islamic tenets.

That has had ripple effects.


Elaheh Koolaee, a professor from the University of Tehran who formerly served in the Iranian Parliament, said that Iranian women had been watching the Moroccan example and that a Muslim success was an invaluable tool. "It's important for us to show positive experiences from within Muslim societies that are not from the U.S. or Europe," she said.

Mir-Hosseini said she believed that change was coming and that it was just a matter of when.

"There's so much tension and energy there now," she said. "It will be a flood."

1 comment:

JaneDoeThreads said...

~sigh~

I have so many conflicting feelings on this, I KNOW there are yes, Muslim women who are very much fighting for reform,

but I also know, there are jihadists Posing as reformers and claiming to be feminists who have cleverly colonized so many feminist platforms from the liberal to the radical and not only have they colonized they do all in their power to silence any critics, even going as far as following them around on the web and threatening them [or their jihadist brothers doing that].

They use many tricks, and deceits. One common tactic they use is painting you as either a Nazi or as a racist or as a Zionist, etc., and then turning you in to groups and discrediting you, but not only do they do this,

they Also, watch for those women that are yes, reformers and list them on tweeter, where they can be watched. And what is so eerie about how they do this,

is they do it while claiming to be apostates, moderates and reformists.

The true reformists that I have met don't post in open public [excluding some of the more public ones that are Republican and who have some protection, etc] but the women I know who are fighting and that are still living within Islam

do so with the utmost care because their lives are at risk, every single day. And they don't just have to worry about the men, they have to worry about not just the women who are supporters of Islamist fundamentalism but the have to worry about the ones who claim to be apostates or reformers/moderates themselves.

And what is so infuriating about this is that this has been boosted by those feminists and leftists who stand in support of the Islamists that yes, would kill these women.

Every time a feminist or leftist makes some relativist rationale towards Islamism, they have contributed to the force of terror,

and yes, they assist in the deaths of these women and girls. Not only that, but they make it very difficult for any 'reform' to take hold because the efforts are pushed under, censored or they are simply discredited.

What else to consider that while I support reform,

how many more women and children have to die? How many more women in America and in Europe have to be raped/heads cut off? How many more girls sold into marriage?

I for one am not happy with just waiting for reform, I don't think it would happen in time, even in Morocco there is still a high number of horror killings [there is nothing honorable about them therefore I think its time we stop calling them honor, more like Hate Crimes against Women that are Sanctioned in Islam]. Maybe we should call them Islamic sanctioned gender-hate crimes.

why this issue is concerning to me too is human right groups, two that I know of, about a year ago, one in particular said they would now work within the confines of Sharia Law,

I mean, that is just pointless and why even Bother? Seriously, like, how do you reform Sharia Law,

one less rock to be thrown, reduce four witnesses to three, I mean, how?

It simply just needs to go and the fact that we have Western societies [and priests--a Satanic one no doubt in my mind or bishop I think he is], pushing for a partial Sharia is just Unreal!

No, we can't wait for reform, though its good, its just too dangerous to wait or even put hope in it. Its not like we're talking about raising the minimum wage,

we're talking the sanctioned slavery and rapes and deaths of thousands of children and women worldwide and that is growing,

it begs to be stopped. NOW.