UK Home Secretary John Reid, Newt Gingrich, and the Pentagon have all chimed in stating that the misnamed ‘war on terror’ will last a generation or so. To quote Gingrich:
Americans must steel themselves for a long and arduous war against the "irreconcilable wing of Islam," which could last anywhere from 30 to 70 years.
A wing? Were the Japanese pilots who bombed
Mr. Gingrich, if this struggle between a freedom loving ideology and that of the Islamist ideology lasts 70 years without an outbreak of a global war, the Islamists will have won.
Here’s why.
What if
The fascist regimes were making great strides achieving their goals before 1939. Hitler was handed half of
Most people at the turn of the twenty-first century have forgotten that there was a time in Japan before World War II when Japanese nationalists showed an Asianist face to the world's Muslims, whom they wanted to befriend as allies in the construction of a new Asia under Japanese domination. The rise of
Add the lure of the Greater Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere and you have the makings of an infiltration strategy that played on the desires of those under colonial rule and side with the Japanese and their goals. Both the Germans and the Japanese played both sides against the middle when planning the strangulation the democracies.
As we know, appeasement of Hitler and his demands was the order of the day before the outbreak of war in
Lord Halifax records how he told Hitler: "Although there was much in the Nazi system that profoundly offended British opinion, I was not blind to what he (Hitler) had done for Germany, and to the achievement from his point of view of keeping Communism out of his country."
There was even support for Hitler’s ideas. One such group consisted of the Duke of Windsor (the former King Edward VIII) and appeasement-minded elitists known as the "Cliveden Set." The Nazis had longstanding social ties with this group and confided in them.
It has long been widely accepted that this aristocratic Germanophile social network was not only in favour of the appeasement of Adolf Hitler but also in favour of friendly relations with Nazi
This support for Nazism in Europe was widespread, sweeping across the European continent from
One might say of Europe, that even the shameless bigotry towards Jews was not enough to sway Nazi supporters against Hitler in the democratic counties of
The
A political collapse of mainland Europe already weakened by political and economic strife, a real non-aggression pact with Russia in keeping with Karl Haushofer a "Eurasist" who advocated a policy of German - Russian hegemony and alliance, the slow absorption of Britain into the Nazi fold, rebellions instigated by Hitler and Mussolini in the middle east (read control of oil), Japan’s political success of their Greater Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere and their support of anti-colonial nationalist groups in the sub-continent – all would have exploited the playing filed tilted in the favor of the fascist regimes. If they exercised some patience (a generation or so?) they could have dominated the world without reaching for the gun?
Now fast forward to today.
The very same strategy of infiltration and appeasement is being employed now by the Islamists and their useful idiots. Using the many types of Jihads at their disposal – militant, institutional, cultural, media, demographic and litigation Jihads – they could reach their goals of an Islamic dominated world in a generation or so while the non-Muslim countries have their tunnel vision firmly focused on the most obvious jihad – terrorism, or the militant Jihad – and forgetting the more insidious and successful non-violent Jihads.
The Islamists could win without putting boots on the ground and forcibly imposing their ideology on the world. The question is - will Islam, out of impatience or over confidence, reach for the gun?
6 comments:
The longer we leave it, the stronger they get, both in their own countries and ours.
They need to be provked into starting a war prematurely, possibly by insults and 'humiliation'.
I wasn't aware that Gingrich is such a dhimmi. If we follow his plan, we're dead. He needs to get with the program. I wonder what it will take to make Gingrich wake up?
Do you honestly fear a war of ideologies? What if Russia, had not invaded various countries? Would it have shortened breadlines and fundamentally changed the structural defects within Communism? Gingrich suggests a long conflict, which I think is the right analysis. That he suggests that some "wing" of islam is reconcillable conflates the ideology and the adherents. Nazi members, did in fact survive WWII and outlast the Nazi regime, to give us rather little trouble afterward. But more importantly, an ex-KGB operative now warns the US against the ideologies that he once served. The reconicialltion of a "wing" does not necessarily entail the capitulation to an ideology. Why do you presume a long conflict serves their purpose? A long denial, and appeasement surely would, but a long conflict of attrition they cannot win.
islam is aggressive by its very nature. its the only way it can gain space or adherents and is most certainly the only way it can keep those allready intrapped within, in line.
it as an organism will do more and more outrageous things that cannot be ignored even by the most sheeple amongst us.
Can somebody please resurrect Ronald Reagan from the dead? If there are any necromancers that happen to be lurking this blog, I would highly appreciate your services, as would our future generations.
And bring back John Sobieski, Charles Martel and Winston Churchill while your at it.
Post a Comment