Japan frets over the US's F-22s
By Kosuke Takahashi
TOKYO - Across the world, potential buyers, rivals and military experts are watching closely United States President Barack Obama's decision on whether or not to continue building the costly F-22 stealth fighter, Japan is certainly no exception.
No one expects the US to lose its global military hegemony any time soon, but Obama's decision - which has to be made by March 1 - could be a bellwether of how the global economic upheaval will shape American military planning in the coming years. It is also likely to be a good indication of how he will manage relations between the US government and the military-industrial complex.
We are going to need more of these F-22's (Iran, Russia, China), time will issue this proof. If we cannot afford them now, keep the line open with export sales to our best allies.
In Japan, the first would-be overseas buyer if given the chance, there is all kinds of speculation on the issue of Lockheed-Martin's F-22 Raptor, considered the most advanced air-superiority fighter in the world, and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, a next-generation, one-engined supersonic stealth aircraft. Japan could eventually buy one, or both, or neither. It's still hard to find anything concrete.
The US Air Force estimates that the F-22s would cost about $142 million apiece, but when development expenses are added, the price tag soars to more than $350 million per plane. News reports in 2007 said Japan would be willing to pay $300 million each for a fleet of 100. (See Japan fired up over US fighter
May 5, 2007>.)
Some military analysts have said that to replace its aging fleet of about 90 Mitsubishi/McDonnell Douglas F-4EJ fighters, the Japanese Ministry of Defense will maintain its pursuit of F-22 fighter jets. This is based on the assumption that the US Congress will lift its ban on the export of its most advanced US fighters to Japan, which is feasible considering Japan's role as a linchpin of US security interests in the Asia-Pacific region. They believe Washington is willing to preserve the golden era of US-Japan relations, epitomized by the rapport between former US president George W Bush and former Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi.
Some Japanese newspapers, such as the Yomiuri Shimbun, have also reported that faced with continued intransigence from the US Congress over lifting the ban, which is afraid of a cutting-edge technology leak over the possible F-22 fighter sale to Japan, Tokyo will begin to shift towards the other five contenders to replace the F-4 fleet.
Namely, these are Lockheed-Martin's F-35, Eurofighter's Typhoon, Boeing's F-15FX and F/A-18E/F and Dassault's Rafale.
But many are afraid that should the Japanese government order the Eurofighter's Typhoon, the US government would interrupt such negotiations and ask Japan to reconsider them in respect of the bilateral security relationship.
Some are also concerned that Japan's stalled efforts to relocate the US Marine Corps' Air Station Futenma within Okinawa prefecture have already discouraged the US from exporting F-22 stealth fighters to Japan, an indication they say of Washington's waning desire to strengthen the US-Japan alliance as part of its security strategy in the northeast Asian region. The relocation issue has been deadlocked for more than a decade, mainly due to local opposition.
"I don't think Okinawa is a factor at all," Michael Green, former senior director for Asian affairs of the White House National Security Council, said in an interview with Asia Times Online last week. The "biggest issue is whether the USAF [US Air Force] will buy enough to keep the line open until a Japan export version is ready."
Others have also pointed out that Washington is less willing to export F-22 stealth fighters to Tokyo as it could strain strategically important Sino-US relations. Obama's decision on the F-22 fighter program - with its wider implications for Japan-US and China-US ties - will make things clearer on this subject.
"The US is cautious of military technology transfer," said Hideshi Takesada of the Japanese National Institute for Defense Studies, a think-tank attached to the Japanese Ministry of Defense. "It also won't sell the F-22 to the UK and Australia, among others. It should be hard for Japan to receive such special considerations from the US. Should Japan stick to [its plans to buy] the state-of-the-art fighter, it would prove to be damaging to the national interest."
The Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) currently possesses about 360 jet fighters, with three different models. It has about 200 F-15s, about 70 F-2s and about 90 F-4EJ jets, but the latter have been used since the Vietnam War and are scheduled to be retired by 2013.
Japan has repeatedly said throughout 2008 that it is seeking access to information on the F-22's technologies and performance data to review its capabilities before procuring next-generation (FX) fighters for the JASDF to replace the aging F-4EJs.
Japan's Defense Ministry was previously scheduled to begin the acquisition of next-generation FX fighters for the JASDF during the fiscal year 2009 starting this coming April, but delayed this before its deadline of September, 2008. It refrained from requesting any part of the national budget, citing difficulties gathering information about candidate airplanes such as the F-22.
Instead, it requested 89.2 billion yen (US$996 million) in the national budget to upgrade 22 F-15s to improve air defense capabilities, according to a spokesman at the ministry.
In an effort to reduce the impact of a delayed FX selection, the JASDF is seeking to extend the life of the F-4EJ fighters by using them "more efficiently", the spokesman said.
Although this is little-known among foreign observers, the ministry also requested about 8.5 billion yen in the next fiscal year budget for preliminary work to develop a Japanese version of the stealth fighter called Shinshin, meaning the Heart of God. The ministry plans to spend a total of 39.4 billion yen until the fiscal 2015 to develop the Shinshin.
"This is a long-term plan, so nothing related to the FX selection this time around," the spokesman said.
Kosuke Takahashi is a Tokyo-based journalist. He can be contacted at letters@kosuke.net
NO BRAINER, CONGRESS
5 comments:
You don't even need many F-22s to make a huge difference as a force multiplier. At Northern Edge 2006 in Alaska, a joint training exercise, 12 F-22s downed 108 adversaries for no losses. In another exercise, the Raptor-led Blue force team inflicted 241 kills for 2 losses, none of the two being F-22s. Not to mention these adversaries were the most advanced combat aircraft at the Air Force's disposal (F-15s, F-16s, and F/A-18s). Bottom line is that the U.S.A. has to procure as many of F-22s as possible.
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123022371
Exercises make me nervous.
The F-22's main adversary may turn out to be an S-400 system spread across thousands of miles of sensors. In a situation like that any F-15 >>18 will be like flying a Brewster Buffalo in 1942
Sometimes the best answer to beat one kind of technology is a different kind of technology.
The F-22 may not have to defeat the SU-37, it may be something entirely different.
We need as many as we can get, and so do our very best allies
Well aware of the S-300 system as the greatest threat to U.S. aircraft. That link actually discusses the significance of the F-22 against advanced SAM systems like S-300/S-400 series.
Seems like a waste of money considering our current adversaries don't even field an air force. I appreciate the jobs argument in favor of continuing such programs, however the people with the skills required to assemble the F-22/JSF could be better utilized in production of UAV's or retrofitting existing aircraft systems currently in use F-15/F-16/F-18/Ac-130/A-10 etc.
Anyone currently capable of fielding the aircraft that offer a threat to these aircraft are typically nuclear powers, ones we cannot afford to go to war with anyway.
As far as improvements in Air-Defense systems and the adage that they make current systems totally obsolete, well that seems like further impetus to promote UAV's, which remove pilot risk factor out of the equation entirely.
All this means is we're not building any more. The 187 planes in the arsenal will continue operate throughout their 30+ year service life. It's not a huge deal. We fielded all of 13 B2 Bombers (one crashed within the last few months). Guess what? We're still flying the other tweleve on combat mission and I don't hear anyone itching to restart the production line.
Post a Comment