Sunday, February 08, 2009

President Barack Obama has ordered the intelligence community to facilitate a U.S. reconciliation dialogue with Iran

Gertz:

Officials said Obama, in one of his first acts as president, has ordered the CIA and other members of the 16-agency community to assess Iran's response to any U.S. reconciliation effort. They said the order would be a key task of incoming National Intelligence director.



Obama has worked through unofficial consultants to launch a secret dialogue with Iran and Syria.

Iran sternly dismissed decades of U.S. policies targeting Tehran and declared Friday that the new American administration had to admit past wrongs before it could hope for reconciliation.
The comments by Iranian parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani at an international security conference in Munich appeared to be the most detailed outline yet of Tehran's expectations from President Barack Obama's administration.

"The old carrot and stick policy must be discarded," he said, alluding to Western threats and offers of rewards to coax Iran to give up nuclear activities the West views as threatening. "This is a golden opportunity for the United States."

Government and political sources said the dialogue was initiated soon after Obama became the presidential candidate for the Democratic Party around August 2008. The sources said the dialogue intensified after Obama's election as president in November.

"While policymakers need to understand anti-American leaders, policies and actions in Iran, the intelligence community can also help policymakers identify and understand other leaders and political forces, so that it is possible to work toward a future in both our interests," [Ret.] Adm. Dennis Blair, Obama's nominee for national intelligence chief, said. "Identifying these opportunities for American policy and statecraft is as important as predicting hostile threats."

Iran says US must accept nuclear programme

By Roula Khalaf and Najmeh Bozorgmehr in Tehran

Published: February 4 2009 18:48 | Last updated: February 4 2009 18:48

A senior adviser to Iran's president says dialogue with the US will succeed only if the Obama administration accepts Tehran's right to have a nuclear programme.

Mojtaba Samareh-Hashemi, right-hand man to Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, the fundamentalist president, said, in an interview with the Financial Times, Tehran was studying its options, just as the new US administration was reviewing its Iran policy.

In a Jan. 22 statement to the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, Blair highlighted the importance of a U.S. dialogue with Iran that would reduce tension and resolve the nuclear crisis. At the same time, Blair did not cite Iran as a key threat to the United States.

"The United States is engaged in three campaigns in which there are immediate threats to American lives, properties and interests," Blair said. "First is the campaign against anti-American terrorists with global reach who seek to harm us or our allies, partners and friends. These groups include Al Qaida and other extremist organizations as well as the groups they inspire but do not control. The second campaign is in Iraq and the third in Afghanistan, where the United States has deployed troops, diplomats, and nation builders. Providing intelligence support for these three campaigns consumes the largest share of intelligence community resources."

The Obama directive came amid the release of a report by a commission created by Congress that warned of Iran's nuclear program and the prospect of similar efforts throughout the Middle East.

US President Barack Obama's offer to talk to Iran shows that America's policy of "domination" has failed, the government spokesman said on Saturday.

"This request means Western ideology has become passive, that capitalist thought and the system of domination have failed," Gholam Hossein Elham was quoted as saying by the Mehr news agency.

"Negotiation is secondary, the main issue is that there is no way but for (the United States) to change," he added.

After nearly three decades of severed ties, Obama said shortly after taking office this month that he is willing to extend a diplomatic hand to Tehran if the Islamic republic is ready to "unclench its fist".

In response, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a fresh tirade against the United States, demanding an apology for its "crimes" against Iran and saying he expected "deep and fundamental" change from Obama.

Iranian politicians frequently refer to the US administration as the "global arrogance", "domineering power" and "Great Satan".

"Of particular concern is the interest by some states in acquiring a nuclear fuel cycle, particularly Iran's efforts to build uranium-enrichment facilities and North Korea's efforts to reprocess the plutonium associated with spent nuclear fuel," the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Detruction Proliferation and Terrorism, said in a report released on Jan. 22.

"If such facilities spread, so will the number of states with the knowledge and capability to produce nuclear weapons. Such facilities would also increase the risk that fissile materials could be diverted to, or stolen by, terrorist groups."

In contrast, Blair grouped Iran's nuclear weapons program with that of North Korea and Pakistan. He also termed the Israeli-Palestinian a "near-term concern."

"Additional near-term issues of concern are many," Blair said. "They include North Korea's nuclear weapons and missile programs; Iran's nuclear capabilities and intentions, as well as its missile program; the security of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal; and peace and stability in South Asia. They include Israeli-Palestinian violence, with its possibilities for escalation, and its implications for regional stability."

Officials said a U.S. reconciliation effort with Iran would be the key foreign policy goal of the Obama administration. They said Obama has received messages from elements in the Iranian regime since his election in November 2008.

"Under Obama, the State Department and intelligence community, particularly the CIA, would be focused on Iran and avenues of cooperation," an official said. "The president sees Iran as the key to a rapid and smooth withdrawal from both Afghanistan and Iraq."

Iran said on Tuesday it has launched its first home-built satellite into orbit, raising fresh concerns among world powers already at odds with Tehran over its nuclear drive.

"Dear Iranians, your children have put the first indigenous satellite into orbit," a jubilant President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on state television after a launch coinciding with the 30th anniversary of the Islamic revolution.

"With this launch the Islamic Republic of Iran has officially achieved a presence in space," he said.

The Omid (Hope) satellite was sent into space on Monday evening carried by the home-built Safir-2 space rocket, local news agencies reported.

In the first foreign reaction, France expressed concern because the technology used was "very similar" to that employed in ballistic missiles.


"Obama has several sets of advisers, the closest of them who have so far not been brought into the administration," a political source said of of the then-candidate's overtures to Iran and other organizations. "They were the first to be in contact with Iran and Syria. Since then, others have bolstered the dialogue."


Obama's leading adviser on the Middle East, the sources said, was former State Department official Robert Malley. They said Malley used his contacts in the Arab and Muslim world to send out feelers to Egypt, Iran and Syria even before Obama was elected president.

At the same time, Obama also employed separate efforts by U.S. think tanks in sending messages to Teheran, Middle East Newsline reported. One such effort was conducted by the Pugwash group, which met Iranian officials in Europe throughout late 2008. The Pugwash effort was headed by former Defense Secretary William Perry.

The sources said Obama drew from the secret discussions with Iran when he appealed for a dialogue with Teheran. In his first television interview — with the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya satellite channel — Obama said he was launching a reconciliation effort with Iran.

"I do think that it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are, but where there are potential avenues for progress," Obama said on Jan. 26. "And we will over the next several months be laying out our general framework and approach. And as I said during my inauguration speech, if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us."

The sources said Obama has also used longtime colleagues as well as think tanks for a dialogue with Syria, Iran's leading ally. The United States Institute of Peace, financed by Congress, told a Jan. 29 news conference that a delegation met Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus in late January. The delegation included Ellen Laipson, a member of the Obama transition team

One day after US President Barack Obama offered to extend a hand of peace if Iran “unclenched” its fist, Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today demanded that the new US administration apologize for the past “crimes” Washington had committed against Tehran.

Meanwhile in Iraq, the good news is that the elections clearly reflected a more stable and orderly Iraqi society. On a serious note, however, the elections were facilitated by the U.S. military and other expressions of U.S. resolve. Could Iraq, threatened by ethnic tensions and neighboring Iran, conduct such elections without a major U.S. military presence?

Remove the U.S. troops in 2009 and Iraq — and the rest of the region — could slide back into chaos.

In addition to heading Pacific Command, Blair was the associate director of central intelligence for military support, coordinating intelligence and military operations during the Clinton administration. He retired from the Navy in 2002.

Blair graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1968 as did Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen and former Marine Corps Commandant Michael Hagee.






8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Won't be a bit surprised if one of the next things we hear about is how the US aquieses to dinnerjackets demands. Just to prove big satan's immediate sincerity, BHO resurrects J F Kerry diplomacy and provides necessary supplies for Iran's nuclear project.

Epaminondas said...

Why bother, we already seem to be discussing holding back on the missile defense in Poland to make Russia happy ostensibly for their help with Iran?

I hear Obama wants to buy this bridge between Bklyn and Manhattan also

Warren said...

How about admitting we were wrong not to lynch Jimmy Carter and then nuke Terran?

Anonymous said...

I am speechless.

Someone please explain to me how this does not come down to a choice between two basic operating premises on the part of our "leaders": One, that no one in the Obama circle of advisors understands the meaning of Jihad and Taqqiya and the fact that accepting these demands will lead directly to an eventual nuclear strike by Iran...

Or...

Two, that they do understand that the Islamists mean what they say and are prepared to "save" us by means of submission. Because The One and his acolytes are down with that.

Because the alternative to this choice between criminal negligence and treason is to believe that the country is being run by delusional idiots. Which means chaos, which is somehow even harder to accept than cowardice or conscious evil.

Epaminondas said...

DELUSION

They believe the vote in November "makes" them correct

Pastorius said...

This Iran thing is going to take time to play out.

However, if Obama does not re-charge the Guantanmo prisoners, and instead releases them, then I think we will know all we have to know.

WC said...

I don't understand Obama. Has he any - ANY - idea what will happen if a nuke exchange between Israel and Iran happens.

Does anyone?

Folks, an event like this - read the Samson Option - would have Europe frezzing in the dark and us with $25 a gallon gasoline - if we can get it.

Obama should be shaking in his boots at such a scenario and what is he doing? Hastening it.

When the nukes start flying in the middle-east there will be no need for discussion of the who, what, where, why and when.

There will be a scramble for oil. The West, Japan and China will want it. The mid-east has it. And ... well, you fill in the blanks about the future of the sheiks at that point.

Damien said...

Warren,

We should have attacked Tehran, but I don't think we can execute a president for making a stupid mistake, especially think I don't think Jimmy meant to harm his country.