The so called animal-right groups do of course not have any issues with halal-slaughter by those who scream 'kill the Jews', on the contrary, if one take a look at a leftwing blog promoting animal-rights it is not surprising to discover it contains Anti-semitism, is filled with hatred and not surprisingly it supports terrorism glorifying jihadis and the murder of our troops and citizen, going through a leftist blog is eyeopening, and helps explaining to a degree the question 'How come people became Nazis?'... They believe they are 'moral superior' from the rest of us advocating from a faux piedestal of a self-proclaimed 'Über-moral', what is further telling from the leftist mindset is that they in the same breath applaud Iranian President Ahmedinejadh's Anti-semitic speech to the UN while linking to the latest updates from the Animal liberation movement at the bottom, the irony is complete, the mindset disgusting and chilling at the same time.
The Nazi philosiphy of Animal-rights activism had a clear but sinister goal (From: Regarding animals by Arnold Arluke, Clinton Sanders)
- The drawing and blurring of lines of demarcation between humans and animals - Was essentiel of the Nazi paradox. After briefly discussing the extend of Nazi animal protection, we will see this boundary at work was effected in three ways - By morally elevating animals, identifying with them, and animalizing humans.
The same philosiphy is the ideological agenda of todays leftists as written in 'About' on the leftwing blog Civil libertarian, it even shares the same issues almost by the letter from the Nazis such as 'Vivisection':
....is dedicated to ending the unnecessary suffering of oppressed and exploited sentient beings and to the total liberation of human animals, nonhuman animals, and the Earth....
Keeping this in mind the animal groups are not surprisingly fighting for the ban on Kosher, just like the Nazis, what is, quote, unquote, surprising, is the EUSSR's legalization of Kosher, expect the left to fight the decision.
EU Legalizes Kosher Slaughter
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu - Israel National News
The European Union Parliament on Wednesday voted to legalize kosher slaughtering, which has
been outlawed by six countries -- but a critical vote next month will determine if EU countries can effectively get around the approval by demanding pre-stunning, which violates Jewish dietary laws.The European Jewish Congress and conference of European Jewish Rabbis lobbied heavily for the bill and defeated efforts by animal rights groups to ban kosher slaughtering, which demands swift death to the animal by use of a sharp knife at the throat.
Animal rights groups have claimed the method is cruel and have succeeded in banning kosher slaughtering in Latvia, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Estonia and Lithuania. Switzerland allows the method for poultry but not for other animals.
Rabbi Michael Melchior, former chief rabbi of Norway and currently an Israeli Knesset Member, has said that kosher slaughter is actually more humane than the practices in slaughterhouses. "The Torah forbids cruelty to animals, and the shechitah [slaughte process ensures that the animal loses consciousness immediately," he explained. "We have been dealing with this issue for many years, and there are many scientific studies that back us up."
The EU vote “represents the first time that ‘shechita’ has been recognized as a legitimate form of animal slaughter by any European institution," said Henry Grunwald, President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews and Chairman of Shechita EU, which also fought for the new legislation.
The crucial vote on pre-stunning worries European Jews. "The [propo regulation must not be drafted to allow governments in Europe to threaten our culture and our freedom to observe our religion," said Philip Carmel of the Conference of European Rabbis. Serge Cwajgenbaum, Secretary General of the European Jewish Congress, added that “the Jewish community takes seriously the issues of human rights and the humane treatment of animals.”
The anti-kosher slaughtering bills have been viewed as anti-Semitic by many Jews in Europe, where Hitler banned the method as one of his first steps against Jews.
When Holland called kosher slaughtering "cruel" in 2003 but allowed Jews to continue using the method, Rabbi Melchior responded, "They simply don't want foreigners, and they don't want Jews. I won't say this is the only motivation, but it's certainly no coincidence that one of the first things Nazi Germany forbade was kosher slaughter.”
Attempts by Swiss Jews to lift its 100-year-old ban on kosher slaughtering caused an anti-Semitic backlash. In Sweden, there have been attempts to forbid circumcision, a Jewish law that has bound Jews for 3,500 years.
Abraham Foxman, the national director of the U.S.-based Anti-Defamation League, has said that anti-Semitic politicians “aid and abet” animal right activists. “What other issues of animal rights have they engaged in to prohibit cruelty? When they begin and end with kosher slaughter, that's when it becomes suspect,” he stated.
8 comments:
Dude, kosher slaughter should be banned in every decent country. Peter Hammond states how halal slaughter is used as a pretext to import Mohammedans in every country which is destroyed by Islam, and kosher slaughter is halal slaughter with salt. It's also barbaric, immoral, and disgusting, just like circumcision. Judaism has existed this long by evolving and progressing. We don't stone adulterers or sacrifice animals today, either, in emulating our only-slightly-post-fire-worshipping ancestors from 4000 years ago. Kosher slaughter should go, and so should halal.
Rolf Krake did what every "good Jew" must do, acuse anyone who dares disagree with them of anti-Semitism. The label of anti-Semite used to be applied to one who hates Jews. Now it refers to anyone hated by Jews.
Nice use of Godwin's law by the way. Because anyone who opposes Kosher slaughter is a Nazi. It can't be because, I don't know, Kosher slaughter is BARBARIC and SADISTIC? I do not see how opposing a primitive, brutal, and out-dated means of slaughtering animals translates into hatred of everyone who belongs to the (purely fictitious) Jewish "race."
Plenty of ethnic Jews oppose kosher slaughter. By the way, even if kosher slaughter is banned in all civilized nations, that does not constitute a real restriction on religious freedom. Jews do not HAVE to keep kosher just because they are Jews, however, if observant Orthodox Jews do not have access to kosher meat they still have the option of a kosher vegetarian diet, and if they don't like it, they are more than welcome to move to Israel, you know their Jewish state that we've ALL (Americans, British, French Germans; both Jews and Goyim) worked to build/maintain.
You know what is the real reason for anti-Semitism? The self-righteous, persecution complex and the extreme collectivism shared by SOME (not all) Jews.
Prohibitting kosher slaughter will not lead to the eradication of Judaism, but even if it does, GOOD RIDDANCE! That would mean one less vile Abrahamic religion. One down, two more to go!
But I forgot, Jews are the "Chosen People" and the Goyim are unworthy. Oh, dear, what have I done? I must be an anti-Semite! (Even though I am 1/4 Jewish. Does that make me only 3/4 anti-Semite? Or does it make me 1/4 self-hating Jew?)
Adam,
How do you know Rolf is a Jew?
@ Pastorius:
Isn't it obvious? There are only two three possibilities: either Rolf is openly Jewish, Rolf is a crypto-Jew lying about his Judaic affiliation, or Rolf is a Shabbos Goy (gentile useful idiot).
If either of the first two are correct (i.e. that Rolf is Jewish), I find his self-righteous, supremacist attitude and paranoid persecution complex extremely disagreeable, but I can at least forgive him partially for behaving in what he believes to be HIS interests. If he is in fact a Gentile, then Rolf is a disgusting traitor for siding with a (minority) faction of Jewry (that does not speak for Jews-as-a-whole) against humanity at large.
He uses rhetorical tactics that are typically (though not exclusively) employed by Jews, namely libelous insinuations and thr "reducto ad Hitlerum." Based on HIS concerns, I can almost guarantee that Rolf Krake is a religious Jew feigning atheism/secularism.
...oh wait! How do I know he is even "feigning" atheism? Whoops! I misread infidel, interpreting it in the sense that Secular Web (infidels.org) uses it, as in "atheist" or "humanist." I should have known that a neoconservative blog like "Infidel Blogger's Alliance" would use infidel in the broader sense that Muslims use it, as in anyone who is not Muslim.
In either case, I think it obvious that Rolf Krake is an Orthodox Jewish Zionist (either Modern Orthodox or Chardal) by his concerns alone. I doubt a secular Jew or a Reform Jew for that matter would care too much about bans on kosher slaughter, no matter their views on Zionism and the state of Israel. I also think it obvious that he is aligned with Zionism, certainly not with Neturei Karta or Satmar, based on what he subconsciously reveals about his (paranoid neocon) world view. Jew or not, Rolf is definitely a Zionist!
What makes you think Rolf might not be a Jew, Pastorius?
In either case, bans on kosher and halal slaughter may work in everybody's favor, including Jews! (Especially Jews.) Think about it. Were such bans put in place, most Orthodox Jews would emigrate en masse to Israel.
Animal rights advocates can be grateful that very barbaric, brutal, and gruesome means of ritual slaughter are outlawed.
Anti-Semites can take solace in the fact that there will be less Jews in their home state or country.
Jews benefit in two ways:
(a) Ritual slaughter bans would prohibit kosher AND halal slaughter. The reduction in the halal meat supply would serve to impede Muslim immigration and even provoke Muslim emmigration. (Jews HATE Muslims!)
(b) Outlawing Kosher slaughter in the United States and Europe would pressure Orthodox Jews to immigrate to Israel, thus keeping Jewish numbers in Israel-Palestine up.
Oh, wait! But if Orthodox Jews emigrate en masse from the United States, Great Britain, France, and Germany (Israel's "Big Four" guardians), then who is going to lobby Americans, British, French, and Germans to continue giving financial and military assistance to Israel? The great influx of Jews to Israel may not be enough to keep the Arabs at bay without armaments, munitions, and monetary aid, or without the USA to fight wars on behalf of Israeli interests.
Luckily for the Jewish Zionists, there would be plenty of Reform Jews and secular Jews who tend to be the most staunch supporters of Israel and Zionism remaining even without kosher meat, so the ADL, AIPAC, and other Zionist groups need not go understaffed after kosher and halal slaughter bans. Not to mention, with a mass-exodus of Orthodox Jews, nearly all anti-Zionist Haredim would move to Israel, thus removing an obstacle to pro-Zionist Jews in the "Big Four" guardian nations.
So considering that: (a) ritual slaughter bans would mean greater per capita Muslim emmigration than per capita Jewish emmigration, and it would impede more Muslim immigration than Jewish immigration per capita; (b) drive out Haredi obstructors; (c) bring more Jews to Israel; (d) placate anti-Semites; it is probably in the best Zionist interests to forbid kosher and halal slaughter. If anything, Zionist Jews ought to throw their full power behind movements to make ritual slaughter illegal! (At least covertly.) I just think that Rolf is too myopic to notice.
Recap: more Jews in Israel, fewer hated Muslims in Israel's guardian nations, fewer (if any) treacherous Haredi anti-Zionists in Israel's guardian nations...
Just think, the Jewish remnant (being mostly Reform or secular) in the USA, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, etc. would continue to support the Zionist project without the obstructive antics of Neturei Karta and their allies, and the Jewish remnant would have fewer pesky Muslims to deal with. Plus, waves of Jewish immigration to Israel would help the Jews stave off the Arab population explosion.
Ironically, by (once again) caving into Jewish pressure, the European Union actually worked against the agenda of many Jews without awareness!
One more point and I'm done:
Does anybody notice the Original Artwork by Bosch Fawstin?
It contains a cartoony silhouette of a hulkish man and reads: AGAINST "THE WORLD"
Notice anything? The shadowy figure has a Star of David and an American flag on his torso with a large looming Star of David in the background.
Who has the larger symbol? Which symbol is on top? Which symbol appears more? This not-so-subtle Zionist propaganda should open the eyes of you useful idiot Goyim as to who is in charge and what this whole "clash of civilizations" is all about.
If we are really at war with Islamic extremism, why did the USA divert resources from fighting the real perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks in Afghanistan to fight one of Israel's main enemies in the Levant? Why does the USA (Israel's guardian) support the Islamo-fascist Saudi monarchy, you know the regime of Saudi Arabia, home of Wahabbist Islam and of most of the 9/11 hijackers?
Wake from your slumber you dumb Shabbos Goyim!
Neither Rolf Krake nor Bosch Fawstin are Jewish, and neither am I.
In fact, Bosch Fawstin was born and raised a Muslim.
You are an intelligent guy, but you live by pathetically small stereotypes.
Worse still, all the whines and shrieks of "anti-Semitism" will only make the problem worse. The Holocaust was a horrible tragedy, but that does not confer "special rights" on the Jews. Jews are not entitled to any rights just because they are Jews, they are entitled to rights because they are human beings. Therefore, Jews are no better or worse than anyone else, so let's drop the "Chosen People" shit!
However, the Zionist Jews are always demanding special treatment. It's not good enough that they have their own Judenstaat, supported by every Western nation. They need special treatment. I think as long as Jews have their Jewish state to retreat to, and as long as the gracious host nations invest so many resources in maintaining said Jewish homeland, isn't it fair to allow the gentile nations to live under their values and not the reactionary values of Orthodox Jews or militant Zionists? If a gentile nation wishes to outlaw cruelty to animals (i.e. brutal kosher and halal slaughter, which is NOT more humane than more conventional methods, see for yourself if you have the guts!), then so be it. [And don't disguise this as a "religious freedom" issue. A Somali immigrant is free to practice Islam within reasonable bounds, which means he can not use "freedom of religion" as a justification for a "right" to practice FGM on his daughter.] Jews who want to live in Western nations must accept Western values. (Which most do, at least the non-Orthodox Jews.) If they do not, they have their own damn country! However, Zionist Jews wish to "have their cake and eat it too." Which is it? Is your mission to establish a safe haven for Jews in Palestine or is it to force every other nation to be a Jewish homeland? If the former, then perhaps the Jews should stop telling gentile nations how to conduct their internal affairs. If the latter, then the entire Zionist endeavor is rendered moot.
Thanks to Orwellian Doublespeak, anyone who supports animal welfare is an anti-Semite. Anyone who supports human rights is an anti-Semite. Anyone who opposes imperialism is an anti-Semite. Notice anything? All this bitching about anti-Semitism, at first by Jews, now by their Shabbos Goyim, will only further undermine the meaning of the term. It is a case of the boy who cried wolf. (The Rolf who cried wolf?) As the guardian goyim continue to send foreign aid to Israel, during tough economic times, and should more Americans die in wars fought on behalf of Israel, expect anti-Semitism to rise. Groups like the ADL continue to chase "anti-Semitism" as they define it while allowing the REAL anti-Semites (i.e. neo-Nazis) to go about their business. That is because Zionism THRIVES on anti-Semitism.
And since you mention Bosch Fawstin, you claim that he is (was?) a Muslim. An Islamic Zionist? Is that sniveling coward Bosch Fawstin still Muslim or did he convert? If he converted, was it before or after he betrayed his people by siding with those who would EXTERMINATE them? And what religion does he now practice? Is he a Christian Zionist (Evangelical useful-idiot in the mold of John Hagee)? Is he a "Benei Noah" (adherent of the Noahide slave religion)?
Of course, nowhere did I state that "Bosch Fawstin" is Jewish (though I do consider him a coward and a traitor). I was only pointing out that he is a "Jewish supremacist" (if not a Jew himself) as evidenced by the not-so-subtle indication that he favors Israel over the United States of America. The Israeli flag appears ABOVE the American flag, the Star of David appears twice while the American flag appears only once, the Star of David appears LARGER than the American flag. Three ways of indicating where Mr. Bosch Fawstin's true loyalties lie. That he is an Israel-first GENTILE makes him all the more despicable.
I can't wait to see the looks on all your faces when your Jewish Zionist masters no longer need you, and they turn on you like a pack of wild jackals...
Post a Comment