Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Academia's Love Affair with Islam

During a brief stroll through my Alma Mater, CUNY, I was shocked to find enthusiastic attention and admiration for Islam. I picked up the monthly schedule of events to find it packed with lectures devoted to Muslims and Islam. The emphasis is on the unfair perceptions in the West coupled with talks about “understanding” the Islamic viewpoint. Critical examination is missing not because Islam is another culture—there is a critical talk on Hindutva—but nothing similar about Islamic culture.

In the Graduate Center’s magazine, Folio, there is a forum on “Immigration and Islam: How will Western Europe cope with its growing and restive Muslim population?” We find that the current revival of Islam among Muslims in the West is blamed on … the West!
“The eagerness with which many young Muslims in Britain embrace their Muslim identity would seem to mirror the way Europeans have come to identity these immigrants,” states Prof. Jose Casanova. Prof. Tariq Modood says, “… among Muslims, the younger they were, the more Islamic they were …” According to the author of the report, Modood attributes this trend “to pressures British Muslims have come to feel after the terrorist bombings and the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.”
The fact that Muslims, worldwide, have been returning to the original practice of their religion (Salafi) over the past 30 years has nothing to do with it according to these academics. They are become serious about Islam because of the West!!!

Let me leave the absurdity of this notion aside for the moment and focus on something very telling in Modood’s exposition. Notice how he refers to Iraq and Afghanistan. Why would a so-called moderate Muslim be upset with the removal of the Taliban from Afghanistan? Why would a “moderate Muslim” be upset with removing Saddam and ending the civil war in Iraq between al Qaeda and fundamentalist Shiites? Modood clearly see Muslims identifying with the so-called fundamentalists. This only makes sense if there is only one Islam: fundamentalist Islam.

Given the propaganda for infidels, that there is supposed to be a moderate Islam and a few extremists that don’t represent true Islam, we should see vast Islamic support for the defeat of the extremist "hijackers" of Islam. However, here we see the truth coming out … Muslims see fundamentalists as authentic Muslims. No one in this academic forum questioned the implications because these assumptions are tacitly assumed despite the overt disclaimer.

Why the love for such a fundamentalist, barbaric, and oppressive creed? It isn’t just multi-culturalism—note the critical examination of Hindutva. There is truly a love fest for Islam in academia.

See also, today’s article on Front Page Magazine.

6 comments:

Unknown said...

Hi.
I believe the same thing there are no two kinds of Islam,the "moderate"form does not stand up against the more extreme form ,the other way around does happen quite often.Like i said before the "Light" form kills you also in the long run.

Durotrigan said...

Professor Tariq Modood of the University of Bristol: a slimy character. A former Ugandan 'Asian' who was generously taken in by the UK when Idi Amin kicked him out of Uganda along with his co-ethnics in 1972. Just look at how he has repaid the hospitality of my people who have given him a comfortable tenure at one of our more prestigious universities! He craps on us however he can, and corrupts the minds of his students and those who read his intellectually feeble books and articles. What a wretched, venomous ingrate!

Jason Pappas said...

Durotrigan, thanks for the background. A quick google search shows his position: "Building a more formal relationship with sharia courts would be a pragmatic way to develop our multicultural citizenship." - Guardian article

Jason Pappas said...

I agree Will. There is only one Islam.

Silverfiddle is right ... they sense the inherent opposition to our values and they love it!

Pastorius said...

Why would a moderate Muslim be opposed to the removal of the Taliban?

Sorry to be pedantic, but the answer is, Muslims believe that Infidels do not have the right to oppose the Ummah on anything, especially not the battlefield.

When an Infidel opposes a Muslim, or a group of Muslims, the Muslim Ummah is expected to side against the Infidels, no matter how wrong the opposed Muslim/Muslims might be.

If Satan himself appeared, declared himself to be a Muslim, and started anally raping Muslims, and we opposed Satan, Muslims would be angry with us for doing so, and they would come from all over the world to kill us.

This is what has happened in Bosnia, for instance.

Pastorius said...

Come to think of it, the Satan illustration is not that far-fetched. If Satan did appear, he would surely declare himself a Muslim.

;-)