Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Realpolitik Returns: Western Leaders Turn Cold On Arab Spring



BERLIN – At the height of the giddiness over the fall of the Mubarak dictatorship in Egypt, leading German politicians were putting themselves through the wringer. Too long had the West dealt with Arab despots based on the false assumption that only they could guarantee “stability” in the explosive Middle East. From now on, support of human rights and democracy had to form the basis of a values-oriented foreign policy.

Only a few months later, these views, at least as far as government parties are concerned, appear to have been erased from memory. It’s as if this spring’s revolutions, which didn’t shake up just the Arab world, had never taken place. Now, it’s all about the controversial planned sales of tanks by Germany to Saudi Arabia. That golden oldie, “realpolitik,” is back. Of course, “human rights considerations must play a role, but international security interests take priority,” says German Minister of Defense Thomas de Maizière, adding that Saudi Arabia is “one of the most important anchors of stability in the region.”

The opposition would be a good deal more credible in its indignation about the tank deal if it had also complained when the German government refused participation in the military intervention to protect Libyan revolutionaries against mass murders perpetrated by Muammar Gaddafi’s forces. Or if it kicked in full-on about the West’s ongoing inaction in the face of Syrian death and torture squads acting against its own people.

Click on the title to get the whole thing at Good Shit.

9 comments:

Super Samson said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Super Samson said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pastorius said...

Yeah, you're right. We are too much of a Goy Fest. And, a sausage Fest. The Sausage Fest thing is my fault, because I seem to have alienated all the women.

The Goy Fest thing happened through much more unfortunate circumstances.

Still, we get called Zionist pigs and Jews often enough, by those who think a Jew is anyone they don't agree with.

Pastorius said...

I think Saudi Arabia is perceived as "an anchor of stability" because of their perceived willingness to play ball with us on the price of oil. They seem to have more clout than most other nations, perhaps, because of the presence of Mecca? Additionally, I guess I would have to ask this question, if Saudi is not our "friend" in the ME, then who is?

LOL

I'm just glad we've started to be more real about Pakistan.

As to your request about contributing. Email me at

cuanasblog

@

yahoo.com

midnight rider said...

Super Samson -- in Pasto's defense the "anchor of stability" comment, is not his, nor is the other. The article was written by Richard Herzinger at Die Welt and published over at Good Shit.

I have never been in favor of the U.S. in Libya, nor has or is anyone else here (I think). We may hope Gaddaffi (Qaddaffi? Kadafy? Shithead?) gets his comeuppance but we certainly sahouldn't be there. Hell, they won't let us win in Afghanistan why waste more American lives and equipment and talent?

And you are correct, we are among the very few (Jawa was there, Ace too, I think,and a few others) who feared what may come of the Arab spring in Egypt.

Sadly, it seems to be playing out just that way.

Always On Watch said...

Pastorius,
I seem to have alienated all the women.

Hey! I'm still here.

Pastorius said...

I'm very glad you are, AOW.

Here's a partial list of women I have pissed off:

Pamela Geller
RevereRidesAgain
AmericanRose

Here are some women who still contribute to IBA:

AOW
Chritine
Claudia

So, yeah, I have not alienated all the women.

Super Samson said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pastorius said...

I actually have not alienated all the women. Just the hysterical ones.

And, that response ought to tell you enough to understand how I alienated them.

Somehow Christine, Claudia, and Always on Watch have been able to work with me for a good six years.