Whenever Any Form of Government Becomes Destructive To These Ends,
It Is The Right of the People to Alter Or To Abolish It,
And To Institute New Government


Friday, January 29, 2016

Donald Trump Is Shocking, Vulgar and Right And, my dear fellow Republicans, he's all your fault

In which, Tucker Carlson NAILS IT!

From Politico:
About 15 years ago, I said something nasty on CNN about Donald Trump’s hair. I can’t now remember the context, assuming there was one. In any case, Trump saw it and left a message the next day. “It’s true you have better hair than I do,” Trump said matter-of-factly. “But I get more pussy than you do.” Click. 
At the time, I’d never met Trump and I remember feeling amused but also surprised he’d say something like that. Now the pattern seems entirely familiar. The message had all the hallmarks of a Trump attack: shocking, vulgar and indisputably true. 
Not everyone finds it funny. On my street in Northwest Washington, D.C., there’s never been anyone as unpopular as Trump. 
The Democrats assume he’s a bigot, pandering to the morons out there in the great dark space between Georgetown and Brentwood. 
The Republicans (those relatively few who live here) fully agree with that assessment, and they hate him even more. They sense Trump is a threat to them personally, to their legitimacy and their livelihoods. Idi Amin would get a warmer reception in our dog park.  
I understand it of course. And, except in those moments when the self-righteous silliness of rich people overwhelms me and I feel like moving to Maine, I can see their points, some of them anyway. 
Trump might not be my first choice for president. I’m not even convinced he really wants the job. He’s smart enough to know it would be tough for him to govern. But just because Trump is an imperfect candidate doesn’t mean his candidacy can’t be instructive. Trump could teach Republicans in Washington a lot if only they stopped posturing long enough to watch carefully. 
Here’s some of what they might learn: 
He Exists Because You Failed 
American presidential elections usually amount to a series of overcorrections: Clinton begat Bush, who produced Obama, whose lax border policies fueled the rise of Trump. 
In the case of Trump, though, the GOP shares the blame, and not just because his fellow Republicans misdirected their ad buys or waited so long to criticize him. Trump is in part a reaction to the intellectual corruption of the Republican Party. 
That ought to be obvious to his critics, yet somehow it isn’t. 
Consider the conservative nonprofit establishment, which seems to employ most right-of-center adults in Washington. Over the past 40 years, how much donated money have all those think tanks and foundations consumed? Billions, certainly. (Someone better at math and less prone to melancholy should probably figure out the precise number.) 
Has America become more conservative over that same period? Come on. 
Most of that cash went to self-perpetuation: Salaries, bonuses, retirement funds, medical, dental, lunches, car services, leases on high-end office space, retreats in Mexico, more fundraising. 
Unless you were the direct beneficiary of any of that, you’d have to consider it wasted. 
Pretty embarrassing. And yet they’re not embarrassed. Many of those same overpaid, underperforming tax-exempt sinecure-holders are now demanding that Trump be stopped. Why? Because, as his critics have noted in a rising chorus of hysteria, Trump represents “an existential threat to conservatism.” 
Let that sink in. 
Conservative voters are being scolded for supporting a candidate they consider conservative because it would be bad for conservatism? 
And by the way, the people doing the scolding? They’re the ones who’ve been advocating for open borders, and nation-building in countries whose populations hate us, and trade deals that eliminated jobs while enriching their donors, all while implicitly mocking the base for its worries about abortion and gay marriage and the pace of demographic change. 
Now they’re telling their voters to shut up and obey, and if they don’t, they’re liberal. 
It turns out the GOP wasn’t simply out of touch with its voters; the party had no idea who its voters were or what they believed. 
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link#


Blogger Epaminondas said...

It's finally starting to work its way into the mind of the pundits.

It's an inch from a PLURALITY shouting 'just burn it all down'

There is REAL TROUBLE in River City, and it's a surprise to these morons

Friday, January 29, 2016 8:12:00 pm  
Anonymous Nicoenarg said...

Good article. Thanks Pasto. I usually ignore Politico.

Friday, January 29, 2016 8:14:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

As I have so inelegantly put it, "Hey, GOP. Don't shit all over my street and then complain about the smell."

Friday, January 29, 2016 8:20:00 pm  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

There is REAL TROUBLE in River City, and it's a surprise to these morons

Yep! And they can't believe their eyes and ears.

Not sure there will ever be any reasoning with those who are establishment GOP. Group think!

Friday, January 29, 2016 8:31:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home