The Longest War

Dave Rubin recently interviewed Dr. Bill Warner about Islam. It's one of the most civil and straightforward talks about Islam I've ever heard. The most insidious and, in my view, critical part of Islam is discussed at 13:50 in Part I.

Also, at 12:34 in Part II, Rubin asks a very sensible question which gets an excellent response from Warner.

(Originally posted at Isaac Schrödinger.)

A taste of sharia

In France:

The waitress, a French 30-year-old of Tunisian origin, said she was serving drinks at Monday lunch on the terrace of the Vitis Café on Nice’s rue Lamartine, near the rue d’Anglais, when two men started haranguing her, insulting the young woman because she was serving alcoholic beverages to customers.

A Muslim girl who gets out of line! Time to reacquaint her with the Religion of Peace.

The men launched into a tirade, calling her a “dirty whore” and left the cafe in a hurry. A few seconds later, however, the venue's CCTV footage reportedly shows the two men turn round abruptly and one of them rush towards her and violently slap the waitress in the face, knocking her to the floor.

Today alcohol, tomorrow bacon.

This is a simple truth that many infidels don't understand. For Muslims, sharia is just as valid and moral in Saudi Arabia as it is everywhere else. The evil laws of the Procunt Muhammad do not respect the boundaries of the Middle East or Indonesia or Pakistan or Bangladesh, etc.

So, your choice is simple: submit or fight.

(Originally posted at Isaac Schrödinger.)

'Pitiless' or 'Pitiful'?

TWO NEWS ITEMS:

The President of France had vowed a "pitiless response" to the terrorist attack by radical Islam in Paris.

One of the terrorists was on the French terrorist 'watch list'.

If France doesn't AT LEAST do this then the President's response will be more pitiful than pitiless.

If those on the watch list are not citizens - deport them immediately.

If they are citizens - arrest them.

France claims they are at WAR. This is what you do with 5th columnists during a war.

Paradigm Shift

From Salon (dated October 25, 2014) comes this stunner about the nature of Islam:

...[W]hat of all those ISIS warriors unschooled in French semiotic analysis who take their holy book’s admonition to do violence literally? As they rampage and behead their way through Syria and Iraq, ISIS fighters know they have the Koran on their side – a book they believe to be inerrant and immutable, the final Word of God, and not at all “malleable.” Their holy book backs up jihad, suicide attacks (“martyrdom”), beheadings, even taking captive women as sex slaves. This is not surprising; after all, the prophet Muhammad was a warrior who spread Islam by the sword in a dark, turbulent time in history. (Christianity’s propagation had, in contrast, much to do with the Roman emperor Constantine’s fourth-century conversion and subsequent decriminalization of the faith.)

Moreover, the razor-happy butchers of little girls’ clitorises and labia majora, the righteous wife-beaters, the stoners of adulterers, the shariah clerics denying women’s petitions for divorce from abusive husbands and awarding sons twice the inheritance allowed for daughters, all act with sanction from Islamic holy writ. It matters not a whit to the bloodied and battered victims of such savagery which lines from the Hadith or what verses from the Koran ordain the violence and injustice perpetrated against them, but one thing they do know: texts and belief in them have real-life consequences. And we should never forget that ISIS henchmen and executioners explicitly cite their faith in Islam as their motive....

Read the entire essay HERE. Worth your time.

Yes, the tone of the essay is anti-religion. Any religion. But that Salon has actually published the ugly truth about Islam represents a paradigm shift.

And, yes, the Canadian Parliament gunman was obeying the literal word of Allah.  Waiting for those hordes of "moderate Muslims" to make themselves known in a meaningful and very public way.

Meanwhile, the following, based upon the Koran, continues (Click directly on the image to enlarge it):

Necrophilia Is Halal?

From The Pagan Temple, citing this fatwa dated May 10, 2011:

...acceptable for an Islamic man to have sex with the corpse of his dead wife. It's also acceptable, provided it's possible, for an Islamic woman to have sex with the corpse of her dead husband.

But hey, don't take my word for it, take the word of Sheikh Zamzari Abdelbari, an Islamic scholar and Imam from Morocco. According to him, the marriage bonds are not severed by death. That is because the Koran explicitly states that a man and his wife-wives where applicable-will be together in paradise after both have died. Therefore, they are still married, even during that time when one might be separate from the other....

The fatwa apparently states the following as well:

Sheikh Zamzami said that the husband has the right to have sex with his dead wife.

[...]

However, cheikh Zamzami, tempered his most unusual fatwa by stating that necrophilia, though Halal is a disgusting act that would be best avoided.

Islam shames itself on a regular basis.

Muslim Paedophiles Operating in the US

The proverbial has hit the fan in the UK with the latest revelations about "Asian Paedophile Pimps" operating all over the UK for at least 10 years. Even the police would not raise the issue because of fears of being branded racists. Now the cat's out of the bag but the media refuse to say it's a Muslim issue as they ignore the stats; out of 56 court cases 53 involved Pakistani Muslims.

It seems that the U.S. has exactly the same nationwide problem, only difference is that the perpetrators are Somalian Muslims and their victims were African American & Somalian whilst the UK Muslims preferred white girls. Think on this ; Obama is intent on letting another 80,000 Somalians into the U.S.

FBI busts up huge interstate SOMALI MUSLIM child sex trafficking ring. 


Twenty-nine people have been indicted in a sex trafficking ring in which Somali gangs in Minneapolis and St. Paul allegedly forced girls under age 14 into prostitution in Minnesota, Tennessee and Ohio. 

The 24-count indictment, unsealed in U.S. District Court in the Middle District of Tennessee, said one of the gangs’ goals was recruiting females under age 18, including some under age 14, and forcing them into prostitution so the defendants could get money, marijuana or liquor.

The indictment details several instances in which young Somali or African American girls were taken from place to place and forced to engage in sex acts with multiple people. One girl was under 13 when she was first prostituted. Another girl was 18 when she was raped by multiple men in a hotel room, the indictment said.

Read it all here.

A God Who Hates

Whenever someone risks their life to warm the world of an impending danger, they deserve our utmost respect and consideration. Men and women like Ibn Warraq, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Walid Shoebat, Ali Sina, Mosab Hassan Yousef, and now Wafa Sultan inform us on Islam.

Wafa Sultan, in her book A God Who Hates, exposes the degradation and oppression in a culture dominated by Islam. Sultan, a Syrian-born American psychiatrist, presents a penetrating sociological study of Arab society. She picks up where Raphael Patai left off in his classic, The Arab Mind.

The scars of Islamic oppression are deep and difficult to escape. Both Wafa and her husband have struggled to free themselves from the dark bitter worldview that permeates the soul of the Arab culture. This book is a warning to those who believe that nations-building can readily “win hearts and minds.” “Muslims hate their women, and any group who hates their women can’t love anyone else,” she explains in iron clad logic. Why do they hate their women? “Because their God does.” [p7, 128-135]

Islam was founded in a desert culture rooted in raiding and plundering [p66, p174]. Harm and humiliation, if not outright slaughter, were tools to defeat one’s rivals. Islam gave such behavior a moral and religious rationalization. Sultan sees the core ethos at work today in Arab nations. Even Arabs who immigrate to America retain a joy in seeing America humiliated but hide this from English-speaking audience [p59-60].

She painstakingly explains how the authoritarian nature of Islam crushes the spirit of the individual. Every relationship and interaction is defined by who rules and who is submissive. Rather than equals dealing with equals, the master-slave dynamic predominates [p155-164]. This psychology survives even during the heyday of Arab nationalism, when Islam was marginalized.

Arab nations didn’t have secular dictators because we supported them; they had secular dictators because of the inescapable mindset left by Islam. “The United States was accused by Muslims of supporting dictatorships in their countries … and to relinquish their guilt America decided to bring down Saddam Hussein’s throne. … America miscalculated …” [p163] Without a cultural change, without marginalizing Islam, long term prospects are dim.

Sultan’s internal struggle to free herself from the soul-killing hatred of her Islamic homeland gives us an indication of the difficulty of cultural change by those who try to move forward while remaining in an Islamic society. The scars are deep. We are greatly indebted to women like Wafa Sultan. She may not be able to advance the Arab culture but her warning might just save ours.

Muslim Wants Culturist Discrimination Against Muslims in the U.S. Military

Through a wave of conflicting and ironic multicultural platitudes, Private First Class Nasser Abdo has made the case for, at very least, discriminating against Muslims in the military.  Abdo joined the military in April of 2009.  Since then, he has filed for conscientious objector status because, he says, one cannot be true to their Muslim faith and fight for the U.S. in Afghanistan.  He is right.  Private Abdo’s case perfectly illustrates why the military must drop multiculturalism and employ discrimination.[i]

Abdo’s multicultural hypocrisy is common when he claims that he was irrationally discriminated against while simultaneously asking for special treatment because his cultural differences are so significant that we should pay attention to them. When facing any discrimination, after calling you racist, multiculturalists claim that culture provides no rational basis for discrimination.  Multiculturalists, you see, do not really take culture seriously.  But, they then turn around and tell you that culture is very important when they want special treatment.[ii] 

Either we should take culture seriously or we should not take culture seriously.  Aldo makes a powerful case for discrimination when he tells the media that fighting in the US military runs counter to his “maintaining his Islamic faith.”[iii]

Of course, I do not hold out much faith that we’ll learn Abdo’s lesson.  Even after US Army Majory Nidal Hassan killed 13 people on a military base in the name of Islam, the military continues to enroll Muslim into its ranks. That is because politically correct multicultural thinking forbids all historical and logical thought that question its precepts by calling such thought intolerant, racist, and discriminatory.[iv]

Abdo showed just how completely multiculturalism has destroyed our ability to think when no one laughed at the obvious falsehood of his statement that, “Islam does not allow me to operate in any kind of warfare.”[v] In no forum has he been asked about the concept of Jihad.  Even Fox News blithely avoided editorial commentary on his quote that “"Islam is a peaceful religion, it's not a religion of warfare." And so, multicultural logic dictates that 1400 years of Islamic military expansion from Spain to India to 9 – 11 must be ignored to further the idea that all cultures adhere to the same values.[vi]

If we have any hope for learning about cultural diversity, it will have to come from Islamic media.  All non-Western nations assume a culturist, rather than a multiculturalist, perspective. They routinely take their culture’s side in textbooks, international diplomacy and, even, television.  While Aldo claimed that universal culture-neutral precepts embodied in Islam prevented him from being violent in our media, he told Al-Jazeera he wanted out of the US military because Islam told him he was, “forbidden to kill Muslims.”  The implication, of course, is that he could kill non-Muslims. [vii]

Wanting it both ways, again, multiculturalists often take the globalist tact of invoking the “world community.”  Abdo advocated stopping war in the Middle East by “coming together as a community and portraying Islam as the peaceful religion that it is.”  In this explanation he calls the Islamic community his community.  But immediately after he claimed we need “a spiritual approach, the community approach, the diplomatic approach” for peace in the Middle East.  Herein the world community has no sides.  Again, with multiculturalists and their globalist brethren, in one sentence culture exists and the next minute it melts away.  

Notwithstanding Abdo’s historical and cultural ignorance, the military must assume that the very fact of War negates the ideal of the “world community.”  The military, by its very nature, cannot entertain such multicultural pap.[viii]

When Private Abdo told his people via Al-Jazeera television, “I Don’t believe I can involve myself in an army that wages war against Muslims” he provided a slew of valuable culturist lessons. Cultural identity is important and conflict between civilizations persists.  This statement also gives lie to multiculturalists’ universal “global community” sentiment.  And, since the West’s wars will likely be against Muslims for the foreseeable future, Aldo’s honest and truthful estimation of the influence of culture on the individual provides adequate justification for keeping Muslims out of our military.[ix]  

For good measure, Abdo complained that in the military, “There were racial slurs.”  Well the obvious fact of the matter is that there were no racial slurs.  Abdo is white.  If there were slurs they were about his religion.  And religions are not races.  We can clear up this dangerous conflation by using the word “culturist.”  The slurs referred to his culture, not his race.  We should thank Abdo because he has not only shown us the irony in multiculturalists not wanting to consider culture unless they want special treatment, he has shown us how spurious their charges of racism are.

As a culturist, I concur with Private Aldo.  He and the Islamic Fort Hood massacre demonstrate that Muslims should not be in our military.  But to make this a policy, the military must drop multiculturalism’s blindness to culture in favor of culturism.  As its very reason is fighting conflicts between civilizations, the U.S. military cannot safely entertain the multicultural platitudes that have crippled civilian discussion and reasoning.  The military must separate irrational racism from rational culturism. Private Aldo declared that he could not, “Serve both the US Army and his God simultaneously.”  We must listen to Private Aldo.[x]  

John K. Press, Ph.D. is the author of the Book, “Culturism: A Word, A Value, Our Future.”  www.culturism.us has more information about culturism.

---

[i] Free Nassar Abdo Website,  http://www.freenasserabdo.org/

[ii] The Atlantic Journal, History Repeats in Anti-Islamic Mood, http://www.ajc.com/opinion/history-repeats-in-anti-605758.html

[iii] CNN Interview, http://www.freenasserabdo.org/2010/08/cnn-interview.html

[iv] Wikipedia, Fort Hood Shooting, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Hood_shooting

[v] CNN Interview, http://www.freenasserabdo.org/2010/08/cnn-interview.html

[vi] Fox News, U.S. Soldier, Citing His Muslim Religion, Seeks Conscientious Objector Status, Joshua Rhettt Miller, Sept, 02, 2010, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/09/02/muslim-soldier-refuses-deploy-afghanistan/

[vii] The Middle East Media Research Institute, August 21, 2010, http://www.memri.org/clip_transcript/en/2594.htm

[viii] Interview with KPFA’s Aimee Allison, http://www.freenasserabdo.org/2010/09/interview-with-kpfas-aimee-allison.html

[ix] The Middle East Media Research Institute, August 21, 2010, http://www.memri.org/clip_transcript/en/2594.htm

[x] CNN Interview, http://www.freenasserabdo.org/2010/08/cnn-interview.html

No Jihadist Is A "Single Perpetrator"

There is a palpable relief in the media that the Fort Hood shooting is "not an act of terrorism" and the murderer "not a terrorist". Yes, maybe -- just maybe -- Islam had something to do with it, mainly in that the man was "mobbed because of his faith", but whatever, it is an "isolated case", the deed of an "individual acting on his own", a "lone perpetrator".

I specifically liked the reaction of American Muslims:

The news that the suspect is one of their own brings up familiar feelings.

Well yes. I wonder why that is so.

Besides fears of retribution, they're tired of sensing pressure to apologize for someone else's 'maniacal brutality.'

So it was just the individual action of somebody with whom they have nothing to do, besides, terms like responsibility or shame (in the way we understand it in the West) are not known to be near or dear to a Muslim's heart. Apart from fearing (baselessly) for their sorry asses, they can't be bothered.

While it is funny (more peculiar than haha) to hear Muslims talk about individuality, they are, in a way, right. Indeed, bringing Islam forward ("jihad") is the only way that allows for individuality for a Muslim, although killing infidels is still the method of choice for that.

When will people BEGIN to understand that jihad IS terrorism.

And now do me a favour and try the same searches with the term "baruch goldstein" instead of "fort hood".

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

Two Army Doctors Compared

It just occurs to me: Go, compare and analyze the stories of two minority army doctors which appeared, by mere chance, in two consecutive entries at this blog, here and here.

And now tell me what makes their stories so different. Big hint: It is NOT the fact that one is yellow-ish and the other brown-ish coloured.

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

Why Fort Hood Happened NOW

A lot has been said about the Fort Hood shooting. Islam is to blame, immigration is to blame, liberalism is to blame. All that is right, or at least not wrong. But why did it happen NOW? After all, 9/11 happened 8 years ago and there was little Muslim violence against America since then - on home soil, that is. But there is one aspect that wasn't discussed at all, and if, I've overlooked it.

In the course of an email-discussion about American suicidal idiocy that allows Muslims in the military, Gudrun Eussner writes (and I translate):

During WWII, the Americans interned even perfectly loyal Japanese and Germans because of their ancestry. I recently saw a feature about German-Americans who are still fighting for their only too belated rehabilitation.

Did you see that "major" in the shop, clad in djellaba, white cap, the lot? In a shop at a military base!

Thanks BHO, thanks Dalia Mogahed!

I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal… (Barack Obama)

Only waiters bow at the waist. (George V, 1910 -- 1936)

In the mood for another quote?

Five to six million strong, Muslims in America already outnumber Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and Mormons, and they are more numerous than Quakers, Unitarians, Seventh-day Adventists, Mennonites, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Christian Scientists, combined. Many demographers say Islam has overtaken Judaism as the ccountry's second-most commonly practiced religion; others say it is in the passing lane." (Johan Blank, USNEWS on July 20, 1998)

Below is the video to which Gudrun referred, a convenience store surveillance video. It's from CNN and shows army major Nidal Hasan about 7 hours before he murdered 13 people:

What happened today?

At 11:25 AM, the President addresses the House Democratic Caucus – Cannon House Office Building.

At 2:30 PM, the President makes a statement to the press in which he warned the American public against "jumping to conclusions" over the motives of the shooter. Also, he elaborated on health care – Rose Garden.

At 2:45 PM, the President leaves the White House en route to Camp David where he is supposed to play golf – South Lawn.

God help the US of A. Their President who has -- somewhat stumbling -- sworn to do so won't. Notabene that it was political scientist Dr. Gudrun Eussner as well who identified the botched oath as something of greater and more far-reaching consequences, something which Americans, even "conservative" Americans, are either not willing or not able (or both) to concede.

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

Why Allah is not the God of the Bible

Commenter Jake Neuman sent me a link to his website with a summary of his book Islam: Evil in the Name of God. I haven't read it (yet), but judging from the summary and the brief preview at Amazon, I find it sufficiently important to give it some publicity.

The topic of the Evil of Islam and specifically the hanging of women and - yes - little girls in Iran is a recurrent theme of my writing, and the fact that the book focuses on that was an additional incentive for me. So here is Islam: Evil in the Name of God:

THE BANALITY OF EVIL: THE BANALITY OF SILENCE
IT'S ALL ABOUT ISLAM STUPID KAFIR

Read Why: 9/11 is Koran Teaching 9:111. The murder of
2,973 human beings on 9/11 is not a crime
in Islam but a holy,divine act guaranteeing accession
to a Paradise filled with lustrous eyed, full breasted
virgins. Kafirs (nonMuslims) are vile sub-humans to
Muslims possessing absolutely no humanity. The killing
of 2,973 meant no more to Muslims then stepping on
2,973 ants.

Read why in Islam, God is a pedophile monster and a
male chauvinist pig. Sex with children, raping sex
slaves, enslaving women and children are divine, holy,
eternal laws of God.

Read why: The prophet Muhammad was no prophet of
God but a psychotic manic.

Read why: Islam is a total renunciation of God - a very
great crime and sin against God.

Read why: In the struggle against Islam nothing less then
the existence of Western Civilization is at stake.

President Roosevelt said in his 1932 inaugural address
“Only Thing We Have To Fear Is Fear Itself”.

Well - IT’S TIME TO FEAR FEAR

BOOK SYNOPSIS

THE FIRST NEDAS

MURDERED BY ISLAM



Mona Mahmudnizhad...........................Taraneh Mousavi

The picture of the Iranian woman hanging from a construction
boom on the front cover is dedicated to the two thousand women
hanged in Iran since the revolution. They are all the first Nedas.

It is dedicated to the 10 Bahá' religious women hanged
in Shiraz Iran in 1983 after they refused to renounce
their religion and become Muslims - Mona Mahmudnizhad,
who was just 17 years old, 23 year old Roya Ishraqi, a
promising veterinary student, was executed with her 50 year
old mother, Izzad Janami Ishraqi, 20 year old Akhtar Sabit,
a graduate nurse, 28 year old Mahshid Nirumand a physics
graduate from the University of Shiraz, Shirin Dalvand 25
years old, Tahirih Siyavushi a 32 year old nurse, 20 year
old Simin Sabiri, Zarrin Muqimi and the oldest 54 year old
Mrs Nosrat Yalda'I.

Another Neda was Dina Parnabi an Iranian high school student,
accused of smuggling forbidden literature and criticising the
regime in her talks with her classmates. She was hanged on the
10th of July 1984 in a Teheran prison. The hanging was done in
private andafter the execution was over, her body was stripped,
washed and delivered for dissection at medical school.

16 year old Atefeh Rajabi was hanged in public in the town of
NekaAtefeh. Atefeh was executed for “engaging in acts
incompatible with chastity.” At the place of execution in the
town’s square, the judge personally put the rope around the
girl’s neck and gave the signal to the crane operator to begin
her hanging. Witnesses reported that she begged for mercy
and had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the execution
truck. Judge Haji Rezaie said he was pleased to hang her and
is quoted as saying, "Society has to be kept safe from acts
against public morality." Her body was left dangling from the
crane for some time so people could see what happened to
teenagers who committed acts incompatible with chastity.

187 of these first Neda’s were under the age of 18, with 9
girls under the age of 13. The youngest girl executed was
just 10 years old. Thirty two of these women were reported to
have been pregnant at the time of their execution. Many of
those executed were high school and college students. Hanging
is the most common method of execution for women, although
some are shot. Men and women were hanged in large groups
in Tehran prisons from cranes and forklift trucks. Each crane
jib or forklift had a wooden or steel beam to which the noose
was attached and when the preparations were complete, the
prisoners were simply hoisted into the air.

Under Revolutionary law, young girls who were sentenced to
death could not be executed if they were still virgins.

Thus, they were "married off" to Revolutionary Guards and
prison officials in temporary marriages and then raped before
their execution, to prevent them going to heaven. The Mullahs
believed that these women were ungodly and did not deserve
paradise in the next life and that if they were deprived of their
virginity, it would ensure that they went to hell. Therefore, on
the night prior to execution, the condemned girl was injected
witha tranquilliser and then raped by her guard(s). After the
execution,the religious judge at the prison would write out a
marriage certificate and send it to the victim's family along with
a box of sweets.

The back cover is of 3 gays murdered by Iranian justice
according to the holy teachings of Islam.


This book exposes the evil of Islam and very grave
danger Islamic ideology poses to all freedom
loving peoples everywhere.

The issues raised by the recent revivalism of Islam are of
life and death to the democratic world. Islam is one of the
most serious threats freedom loving people have ever faced.
It is the greatest threat that western women have faced to their
hard won freedoms and legal protection of their basic rights.
Islam is one of the most diabolical ideologies ever created. You
must understand what Islam truly represents and participate
in the fight against this very evil ideology.

Ignorance is not an option.

Islam demands the surrender or conquest of all kafir
nations and extermination of their nonMuslim population.
This is the cold-hard reality for the hear-no-evil, see-no-evil,
do-nothing-about-evil naive kafirs. Iran’s present will be our
future if we do not stand against this evil. Only by declaring
that God is a God of Moral Perfection can this Islamization
disaster be prevented.


A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION
VERSUS
ALLAH (the ANTIGOD) OF THE MUSLIMS

By
The Last Prophet Of God
An Unknown Kafir But Not Yet A Dhimmi of Islam

This is an historical book totally devoid of any political
correctness. The Western World is engaged in a life and
death struggle with Islam. Tonight, mankind faces
extinction as a species not only from global warming
but also from Islam. The Last Prophet of God has
destroyed Islam with just one word.

What you must fully understand in order to protect your
family and country against this very great evil living and
flourishing among us is that the Koran defines the kafir
as a subhuman who can be murdered, raped, robbed,
terrorized, or tortured. For Allah, these are holy, divine
acts deserving of Paradise filled with lustrous eyed, full
breasted virgins who regenerate as virgins after each sex
act with Muslim men sporting external erections. All
these Koranic teachings of extermination, murder, rape,
slavery, looting, terror, sex with little girls, the non
humanity of kafirs, sexual Paradise for Muslim killers
etc are FOREVER. THEY ARE ISLAM.

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE KORAN STUPID
KAFIR

Kafirs are vile sub - human beings. They have zero
humanity.

It is the prime directive of Islam to conquer the nations of
the world for Allah (the AntiGod) by whatever means
necessary. Allah (the AntiGod) seeks the extermination
of all kafirs. By refusing to convert to Islam, kafirs
have declared war against Islam, are a grave danger
to Allah and must be destroyed. A most important
concept that must be emphasized repeatedly is that
Islam is a declaration of war against kafirs. What
you must understand is that Islam is not anti Jewish
– it is anti kafir. The Jews are the most viled of
kafirs followed by Christians, Hindus, etc. The Koran
is not a holy book but a book of war. A book of
genocide. Allah is the AntiGod of war. Again, this
war is permanent until all kafirs either convert to Islam
or agree to pay a devastating jizya (submission tax)
and accept dhimmude status (see chapters 43 and 44)
or be murdered.

For Muslims, it is a holy religious duty to murder kafirs.
The Koran is written in the language of terrorism.
It is filled with numerous verses urging the Muslims to
terrorize the non Muslims, kill them, and take possession
of their lands and properties. The important points to
remember are that whatever Muhammad did to terrorize
the kafirs was actually the actions of God. Among the
many verses which exhort Islamist terrorism, the
following verses stand out as naked aggression of
Allah/Muhammad on the unbelievers: 2:63, 3:151, 8:12,
8:60, 8:59, 9:5, 9:29, 9:55, 11:102, and 17:59 etc. These
teachings are the eternal laws of Allah (the AntiGod)
authorization of murder and extermination as a holy duty.

ISLAM IS ISLAM

Islam is not a wonderful religion of peace and love that
has been hi - jacked and perverted by a few bad apples
of evil Islamo - Fascists, Islamic militants, Islamic
Fundamentalists, jihadists, Wahhabism, radical Islam,
political Islam, Islamists etc. There has been no hijacking.
There has been no perversion. These demented souls are
following exactly the teachings Allah and the Koran and
in the divine footsteps of the Prophet – Muhammad as
described in the Hadiths.

MUHAMMAD WAS ALLAH

THE ALLAH (OF THE KORAN) NEVER EXISTED
EXCEPT IN THE MIND OF MUHAMMAD

Allah (of the Koran) was the fictional creation of
Muhammad who slaughtered, murdered, tortured,
terrorized, raped and enslaved kafirs. At the Massacre
of Banu Quraiza, Muhammad personally assisted in the
beheading of 600 to 900 Jewish men and in order to
distinguish young Jewish boys from young Jewish men
ordered their pants pulled down and groin area inspected
for pubic hairs by his SS known as – the Companions.
Those boys with the slightest growth of hair were dragged
away and beheaded. MUHAMMAD WAS THE FIRST
ADOLF HITLER

THE COLD HARD REALITY FOR THE HEAR NO EVIL,
SEE NO EVIL, DO NOTHING ABOUT EVIL KAFIRS

Allah is not God but the AntiGod of the Muslims.

The Koran is not a holy book but Mein Kampf.

Islam is totally bogus, a sham and a fraud

ONLY A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION IS GOD

The Last Prophet has brought mankind a stark message directly
from God – proclaim the Declaration of A God of Moral Perfection
and Muslims abandon Islam or go to extinction as a species.
By embracing this message that only a God of Moral Perfection
is God can mankind save itself from extinction. The proclamation
of this Declaration will be an historical event that will change the
future of mankind. Indeed it will guarantee that there will be a
future for mankind.

In this book the Last Prophet demonstrates;

Why the slaughter of 2,973 on 9/11 meant no more to Muslims then
stepping on 2,973 ants?

Why a Muslim can never be President of the United States ever?

Why all black males will be castrated commencing the extermination
of the black race if Islam conquers the World?

Read The Treaty of Washington: Surrender of United States to Islam.
In God We Trust Will Be In Allah We Trust.

Why teaching children Islam is child abuse?

The Islamic Republic of The United States of America and Islamic
Republic of Europe. The nightmare of an Islamic takeover by Muslims
of the United States and Europe is described in vivid detail.

How Sharia Law will replace the US constitution becoming the
rule of law governing every aspect of every American’s life.

How stealth censorship is destroying freedom of speech.

Why only by declaring that God is a God of Moral Perfection can we
prevent this Islamization disaster of the West?

A revolutionary revolution in the conception of God.

If God exists then God is great. It is the so-called “men of God”
who are not great.

Why Islam is a total renunciation of God and worships Allah (AntiGod)
of the Muslims?

Why in Islam, all nonMuslims (kafirs) are vile subhumans with
absolutely no humanity? Muslims can murder kafirs, rape and enslave
their wives and daughters, loot their property. These are not crimes
but holy, divine, blessed acts guaranteeing accession to a Paradise filled
with big breasted, lustrous eyed virgins who regenerate as virgins after
each sex act with these Muslim killers sporting eternal erections.

Honor thy father or be murdered. Why honor killing is honorable
in Islam?

Why Barack Obama will not expose the evil of Islam, but instead
will make it mainstream and grant this evil ideology respectability?

Why Colin Powell is the ultimate dhimmi’sdhimmi?

Why Western Civilization is the greatest civilization in history?

Why rape jihad is being waged against kafir women across Europe?

Why the boys from Mumbai will soon be followed by the boys
from New York and the boys from London?

And much more.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1: A God of Moral Perfection

If God Exists Then God Is Great. It Is the
So-called Men of God Who Are Not Great

A Revolutionary Revolution in the Conception of God: Declaration of
Universal Religious Rights and Freedoms of A God of Moral Perfection

CHAPTER 2: It’s All About Islam, Stupid Kafir

Your Democratic Obligation as a Kafir

Organization of Islam

The Truth of Islam

Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb: The House of Islam and The House of War

Sharia Law

CHAPTER 3: God of Moral Perfection versus Allah (the AntiGod)
of the Muslims

Requirements Necessary for the Koran to be the
Eternal Divine Word of God

Why the Koran Is Not the Word/Teachings of a God of Moral Perfection.

Broad Overview of the Immoral Koran

CHAPTER 4: Examination of the Immoral Teachings of the Koran

Verse 9:5 The Infamous Verse of the Sword

Verse 9:29 People of the Book

Verse 4:89 Of Apostasy

Verse 5:33 Of Barbaric Cruelty

Verse 8:12 Of Beheading

Verse 47:4 Instructions of War

Evil Demented Depraved Islamic Paradise as Laws of God

Verse 9:111 Muslims Passport to Paradise

Sex In Islam and Islamic Paradise

CHAPTER 5: Allah’s Teachings Celebrating the Massacre of the Jews
At BanuQurayza

BanuQuraiza; Brief Description of the Massacre in Islam’s Own Writings

Muhammad Besieges BanuQuraiza for 25 Days. After the Jews
Unconditionally Surrender All Men Are Beheaded, Women and Young
Girls Raped and Sold Into Slavery. Their Property Is Looted.

Merciful Muhammad Orders Trenches To Be Dug for the Beheaded Heads
to Fall Into and Control the Blood Flow

Big Problem: How Did the SS Jihadist Executioners Decide on Which
Jewish Boys to Slaughter or Leave Alive to be Sold into Slavery

Aisha Describes the Only Woman Murdered At BanuQurayzah:
She Was Delirious Because Her Husband Had Just Been Beheaded.
She Was Taken by the SS Jihadist and Beheaded, Putting Her Out of
Her Joyful Misery

Muhammad Took One of the Jewish Women as His Sex Slave.

The Looted Property and the Jewish Women and Children Were Divided
Among the Muslims

Allah Allows Muhammad and His Jihadists to Have Sex with Their
Sex Slaves

Muhammad Shows No Mercy

Muhammad Enriches Himself

Allah Shares In the Looting and Pillaging of Murdered Jews Property

Why Does Muhammad Not Show Mercy?

Allah (the AntiGod) Celebratesthe Massacre at BanuQurayza

Enjoy the Booty

CHAPTER 6: God’s Incitement to War

Jihad: Holy War: War In the Name of and to the
Greater Glory of God

164 Jihad: Unholy War Verses in the Koran

CHAPTER 7: Rape: A Holy Act Ordained by God as a Weapon of
War

Following are some of the immoral evil laws of Allah (the AntiGod) of
raping sex slaves. These laws are eternal and for all time.
Men can marry up to four women if they treat them equally;
unlimited forcible concubines permitted

Muhammad can go beyond the four-wife restriction, can treat his own
wives and sex slaves unequally.
This verse is for Muhammad. God allows Muhammad to own and
rape his slave girls.

CHAPTER 8: The Massacre at Khaybar

Muhammad Attacks the Rich Jewish Settlement of Khaybar Without
Warning. Muhammad Takes SafiyaAs His Sex Slave After Murdering
Her Father, Brothers, and Torturing and Murdering Her Husband
Distribution of War Booty InKhaybar.

Muhammad Has Safiya’s Husband Horribly Tortured to Try And
Force Him to Reveal Where He Hid the Gold Treasure of the People
ofKhaybar. He WasBeheaded After He Refused to Give Up the Treasure.

The Looted Property and Women and Children Were Distributed
among the Jihadists

Enjoying Special Booty (Gani-maater-maal): Muhammad Takes Safiya
as Booty to Be His Sex Slave.

Muhammad Attacks and Rapes Seventeen-Year-Old Safiya:
Muhammad Was Sixty.

CHAPTER 9: The Massacre at BanuMustaliq

Muhammad Attacks The Jewish Settlement of BaniMustaliq:
He Captures and Rapes a Twenty-Year-Old Jewish Girl, Juwairiya.

CHAPTER 10: Sex Slaves: Muhammad and Those His Right Hand
Possess

CHAPTER 11: Women Are Equal of Men: God Is Not A Sexist;
God Is Not a Male Chauvinist Pig

In Islam’s Own Writings: Allah and His Messenger’s
Extreme Hatred of Women

Muslim Women are Dirty Polluting Creatures

Women are inferior, slave to men

Muslim women are sex object for men's enjoyment

Muslim Men can Capture Infidel Women as Sex-slave Booty

A Woman’s Testimony is Worth Only Half of a Man’s
Brutal Punishment for Women
Fewer seats for women in Allah's Paradise
The Tyranny of Men over Women

Polygamy

Wife Swapping

Wives as slaves

Wife Beating

Muslim Women: Islam’s Domestic Animals

CHAPTER 12: Sexual Perversions of Prophet Muhammad
Necrophilia With His Dead Aunt
Sucking The Tongue of His Daughter and Cousin’s Sons

Muhammad Transvestite Tendencies

Breast Feeding Grown Men by Muslim Women and The Billy Goat

From Islam’s Unholy Book

CHAPTER 13: Allah Is a Pedophile Monster
Baby Tilths

CHAPTER 14: Muhammad: A Human Being of Perfection

Muhammad: The Perfect Husband and Family Man
Baby Aisha and Muhammad: A Love Story For The Ages Between
a 6-Year-Old Child and a 53-Year-Old Sexual Pervert. It will bring
Tears of Joy to Your Eyes and Heart: From The Holy Book Of Islam

Muhammad and Molestation of Baby Aisha (From the Writings of Islam)

Muhammad Would Sexually Abuse His Wives

The Prophet Would Do All His Wives In One Night

This Sickness of Islam and Raping Baby Girls Is An Evil Approved
By Allah(the AntiGod) for All Time

Why Koran 65:4 Is Not The Word/Teaching of God and Therefore the Entire

Koran Is Not the Words/Teachings Of God

CHAPTER 15: Cruelty, Torture

In Islam’s Own Writings: Muhammad, the Most Merciful Prophet
Torture: Hands must be cut off for theft

Muhammad Ordered Feet and Hands Cut Off and Eyes Burnt Out, and
Left To Suffer a Horrendous Death

Beat the children if they do not pray

Burnt alive for missing prayers

Homosexuals are to be killed

Apostates must be murdered

Alcoholics beaten

Stoning in Islam: Diabolical brutality

CHAPTER 16: Allah Is A Barbaric Barbarian

Why Koran 24:20 Is Not The Word/Teaching Of God And Therefore
The Entire Koran Is Not The Word/Teachings Of God And Therefore
Islam Is Fraudulent

CHAPTER 17: Owning Slaves is an Eternal Law of God

CHAPTER 18: The Koran Is a Book Filled with Hate

Hitler: The Final Solution of the Jewish Question and Muhammad:
The First, “Final Solution” of the Jewish Question of Saudi Arabia

Mein Kampf versus the Koran
Hitler and the Final Solution of the Jewish Question

Hitler’s Hatred of the Jews

Muhammad and the First, “Final Solution” of the Jewish Question
of Arabia

Muhammad’s Teachings of Pure Hate From the Hadiths. Kill All
The Jews: The First, “Final Solution”

Muhammad’s Teachings of Hate from the Koran

The Quran Celebrated the Massacre of the Jews of BanuQurayza

Anti-Jewish Hate Teachings in the Koran

Following, from the Koran Are Teachings Not of Pure Love But of
Pure Hate. Verses that show intolerance of and incite violence
against non - Muslims and other religions.

CHAPTER 19: Islam Devours It’s Young

CHAPTER 20: Honor Thy Father Or Be Murdered

What is honor killing?
Honor killing is different from other killings

Some sample cases of horrific honor killing

Honor killing is an ETERNAL Law of Allah (the AntiGod) in Islam
Dictums Of Koran and Hadiths Which Dictate/Incite Honor Killing

CHAPTER 21: Teaching Islam to Children Is Child Abuse
(Recapitulation of Kornic Teachings Quoted In This Book:
Why Teaching Them Is Child Abuse)

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Owning Slaves Is
An Eternal Law Of God?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Raping Slaves Is
An Eternal Law Of God ?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That As Muslims
They Can Loot and Pillage the Property OfKafirs?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Teaches Children
That Kafirs Must Convert to Islam or Pay A Jizya (Submission)
Tax or Be Murdered As Eternal Laws Of God?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That All Other Religions
Must Submit To Islam?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology With An Evil Demented
Depraved Sexual Islamic Paradise?

How Can Any Western School System Allow the Teaching of
An Ideology Created By An Evil Incarnate Child Abuser, Wife
Abuser, Rapist and Murderer – Muhammad?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Preaches the
Oppression and Submission of Women to Men?

How Can Any School Proclaim An Ideology That Teaches
Brutality as An Eternal Laws of God?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Teaches Rape with
Young Female Muslim Children?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Teaches Children
Hate and Intolerance Toward Jews, Christians and All Other Kafirs?

Any School System That Allows Teaching Islam Is Guilty of Child
Abuse and Charges Should Be Brought

CHAPTER 22: Islam Is To Be Superior Over All

Quoting From The Koran

CHAPTER 23: Obeying The Messenger Is Obeying Allah

The Criminality of Muhammad
27 bogus, fraudulent teachings of obeying Allah and his messenger

CHAPTER 24: Very Important Statistics Concerning Koran

Love versus Fear in the Koran: A Statistical Analysis

Muhammad Versus Allah: Statistical Analysis

Jihad: Statistical Analysis

Women In Islam: Statistical Analysis

CHAPTER 25: Absurd Teaching of the Koran – Verses That Allowed
Muhammad to Cancel the Adoption of His Adopted Son and
Marry His Adopted Son’s Wife

CHAPTER 26: Teachings Regarding Muhammad’s Wives
As Eternal Laws Of God: A Soap Opera

CHAPTER 27: Muhammad: A Human Being of Perfection

Muhammad’s Dead Poets Society
The assassinations of satirical poets in early Islam
The Evidence

1. March 624: Al-Nadr bin al-Harith
2. March 624: Uqba bin Abu Muayt
3. March 624: AsmabintMarwan
4. April 624: Abu Afak
5. September 624: Kab bin al-Ashraf
6. September (?) 624: IbnSunayna
7. July-August 625: A One-eyed Bedouin
8. After January 630: close call for Abdullah bin Sad
9. After January 630: One of Abdullah bin Katal’s two singing-girls
10. After February 630: close call for Kab bin Zuhayr
Defense and Challenges

Dark Inspiration from the Quran

Supplementary material

CHAPTER 28: Murdering Musicians, Singers In Islam

CHAPTER 29: The Ten Commandments Are Not the
Teaching of a God of Moral Perfection

CHAPTER 30: Jesus versus Muhammad

Islam Is A Very Great Sin And Blasphemy Against God and Jesus

Jesus the Revolutionary

Jesus Was a True Prophet of Peace and Love

Muhammad Was a True Prophet of Murder,Torture, Terror, Massacres

A Complete Rejection of Jesus

Muhammad and Jesus

He Really Despised the Jesus/Mary/God Trinity Relationship
and the Christian Worship of Them As Polytheism

CHAPTER 31: Western Civilization: The Greatest
Civilization in World History

CHAPTER 32: What Islam Isn’t

CHAPTER 33: Is It a Rational – Is It a Reasonable Human Thought

CHAPTER 34: Reform of Islam:

What Turkey Must Do Before Being Allowed to Join The EU:
The 36th Chapter

God’s incitement of war

CHAPTER 35: Europe’s Final, “Final Solution” of the Jewish and
Christian Question: Finishing the Mission of Muhammad and Hitler
Let’s Give A Red Card to the City of Cologne, Germany

How Stealth Censorship is Destroying Freedom of Speech

CHAPTER 36: The Boys from Mumbai: The Muslim Killers
of the Mumbai Massacre: Soon To Be Followed By the Boys
from New York City and the Boys from London

CHAPTER 37: Muhammad, the Prophet of Peace

CHAPTER 38: Islam, the Religion of Peace

Bloody Expansion of Islam: History of Jihad

CHAPTER 39: Blacks Calling Themselves Muslims
Should Be Ashamed

CHAPTER 40 Barack Hussein Obama: America’s First Muslim
President

CHAPTER 41: Why a Muslim Can Never Be President of
The United States, Ever

CHAPTER 42: Banality of Evil: Banality of Silence

CHAPTER 43: America and Europe’s Future: Dhimmihood

CHAPTER 44: Articles of Surrender: The Treaty of Washington

CHAPTER 45:Sharia Law Will Be the Rule Of Law

CHAPTER 46: Only A God of Moral Perfection Is God

NOTES

SUPPLEMENTARY: Partial Listing of The 1000 Evil Teachings
That Must Be renounced, Denounced and Removed From Koran

THE END

Cross-posted at The Most Destructive Single Cause and Roncesvalles.

While we are all busy catering for Muslims' sensitivities...

... nobody gives an aviating fornication for THAT:

As of now, those are just victims for whom nobody cares. There will be a time when they will be, like Israel, the aggressors who made the poor Muslims doing it. Just wait.

First posted at Roncesvalles.

An Old Flame Never Dies

After Alan Dershowitz and the JPost, Family Security Matters have finally caught up with us as well.* Under the misleading header "Exclusive: Germany Avoids Criticizing Radical Islam and Radical Muslims" Sami Alrabaa posts a synopsis of this blog*:

The German media and some German public figures are soft, too soft, on radical Islam and avoid critics and critique of this violent “religion.” The audio-visual media invite only uncritical talking heads. The print media publish only articles by apologists of Islam. Here are some examples:

The recent confession of the four Muslim terrorists, also called the “Suaerland** Group,” who were planning to kill as many Americans in Germany as they could, was hailed by the judge, state prosecutor, and the media. The devastating terrorist attack prepared by these men was foiled from a tip by the CIA, which the German media depict as not abiding by the law and acting against human rights.

The German media and some German politicians hailed the confession and deliberately ignored the ideological/religious sources of their attack, namely the Koran and Hadith, which incite Muslims to kill non-Muslims.

In an interview with Al Arabiya TV (August 16th), Daniel Cohn-Bendit***, a leading politician of the Green Party in the European Parliament, presented radical Muslims as “part of a socio-political religious movement across the world, like the RAF, the German terrorist group we had in the 1970s.”

[...]

Contributions of critics of radical Islam are rejected by German media. For example, The German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung**** published on July 10, 2009, an article by Alaa Al-Aswani in which he twists facts and argues that the West is ill-informed and biased toward Islam. “Westerners are misinformed about Islam, therefore they hate Islam and hate Muslims,” Al-Aswani says.

I sent a critique on this Islamist writer’s piece, but the Sueddeutsche Zeitung refused to publish it. You can check out an English version of this critique here.

Many programs about Islam have been broadcast on WDR5***** radio and posted on the Internet. None of them, however, mention issues of violence and discrimination against women and non-Muslims, which fill the Koran and Hadith and are practiced by many Muslim families. The WDR5 depicts Islam as a tolerant and peaceful religion, like all the others.

On the other hand, other radio programs are excoriated for criticizing Islam. On June 18, 2009, WDR5 broadcast a whole hour feature attacking the Polish Radio Maria.

Almost every month, I tour all of those mosques run by Arab imams, all over Germany whose language I understand. In every one of these mosques, the imam preaches hatred and violence against non-Muslims. Germany and the Germans are depicted as “decadent and steered by the devil.” At the end, the imam demands loudly the introduction of Sharia, “It is the law of Allah, and the best on earth.” Muslim women are urged to wear the hijab (headscarf). They are also urged to follow the advice/orders of their men as the Koran and Hadith prescribe.

However, the most atrocious parts of imams’ preaches is their incitement to hatred and violence against the Jews and Christians. All of this is ignored and tolerated by German authorities as part of free speech and religious freedom. Israel is depicted as the “aggressor” and the Palestinians as the victims.***** Critique of Islam is presented as “Islamophobia.”*******

All this being said, when someone criticizes Islam and radical Muslims, they are taken to task and branded as racists and labeled as “fascist right-wingers.”********

[...]

With regard to democracy and human rights, the West goes selectively, and the mainstream media, especially in Germany, assert that day in and day out.

While Angela Merkel demands publicly imposing economic sanctions on Iran for its nuclear program, she supports German companies that entertain trade of highly technical equipment with the Iranian regime.*********

[...]

It seems that the German government and other European governments are prepared to deal with the devil if he serves their economic interests. They pay lip-service to democracy and human rights in countries like Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Egypt, if they ever do so. Germany, Britain, France, and Italy are competing to pamper states Libya, Iran, and Saudi Arabia which support terror across the globe.

[...]

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Dr. Sami Alrabaa, an ex-Muslim, is a professor of Sociology and an Arab-Muslim culture specialist. He has taught at Kuwait University, King Saud University, and Michigan State University. He also writes for the Jerusalem Post.

We are relieved that somebody else spreads our word now that the German media and German public figures are soft, too soft, on radical Islam and avoid critics and critique of this violent “religion.” Thanks specifically for the quotes in "religion", Dr. Alraaba, thanks for covering terra incognita Germany at all. Just one additional remark: It has escaped you, as it escapes almost all non-Germans, who venture to comment on German affairs, that the reason why Germans are prepared to deal with the devil is not so much their economic interests, but very much an affair of the heart.

---

*
Sarcasm!

**
Just for the record: It's "Sauerland".

***
Daniel "On several occasions certain kids would open my fly and start to stroke me. I reacted differently according to circumstances, but their desire posed a problem for me. I asked them: 'Why don't you play together? Why have you chosen me, and not the other kids?' But if they insisted, I caressed them still" Cohn-Bendit.
We thematized the Green agenda to legalize sex with children here.

****
Here are our mentionings of the Süddeutsche Zeitung.

*****
We thematized the WDR channel here.

******
See our search label "Germanistan".

*******
See our serach label "Poor Pals".

********
I recommend Rent-A-Nazi in this specific context.

*********
We thematized the Irano-German relationships here.

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

Duh! Or: Three Cheers to Stalinism

I came across the following while I was doing some modest research on the man-with-migration-background-on-German-female rape statistics. The figures concerning the rape of European women by Muslim immigrants, specifically in the Scandinavian countries, are, thanks to Fjordman, well known. However, figures about Germany are conspiciously missing. I have two explanations for that, which may both apply or be both wrong. The first one is that Muslim immigrant-on-indigene rapes are yet not as ubiquitous in Germany as they are in Scandinavia or the U.K., the other one is that Germany is not on the international map, as in so many other respects. However, searching (without result) for such figures, I came across a study by the Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit of the London Metropolitan University "Rape: Still a forgotten issue". As soon I see a feminist issue called "forgotten", all my inner alarm bells start ringing, and I was, not too amazingly, right. The Search for "Germany" led me to the following information dating back to 2001:

Country	Reported Rapes	Population in Mio
England/Wales	9743	52
Germany	7891	82
Greece	170	10
Sweden	1752	9

The interpretation is rather endearing:

If reporting were constant with respect to population, the Greek and Swedish figures should be relatively similar, but the country with a smaller population has a reporting rate ten times higher. Similarly, the German figure should be considerably higher than that for England and Wales, but is actually a fifth lower.

"Should"! You don't say!

At this point, a look at the methodology of the study may be in order:

The base data comprises short questionnaires sent to Justice Ministries in all European Union member states, aspirant states, Switzerland and Norway. Information was sought on:
• Numbers of rape cases reported, prosecuted and resulting in convictions in 1998-2001.
• For countries that failed to respond to the first survey, or provided incomplete data, an opportunity to provide the same information for 1977-1997.
• Any recent research containing either national prevalence data, including unreported rapes, or analysis of the attrition process.
• Details of any major reforms during the 1980s and 1990s with respect to: criminal law on rape; courtroom procedures; guidelines for prosecutors; guidelines for police investigations.
• National provision for forensic medical examinations.
Views were also sought about barriers to successfully prosecuting rape cases and whether rape was currently on the national political agenda. Ministries were, therefore, sent variations of the questionnaire depending on what data had, and had not, been provided previously.

Of 35 Justice Ministries, 21 returned questionnaires, some promptly, others only after multiple reminders by both the research team, and project partners in country. The non-cooperation of some states, and the absence of complete data from others, raises issues about the possibilities of tracking the most fundamental indicators of responses to violence against women, which has not only been recommended by the European Women’s Lobby (2001), but also been matters of policy development during the last four presidencies of the EU.

In other words, this was not a study about rape, but on the willingness of European authorities to comply with mindless, pseudo-academic, feminist projects. No attention was given to the perpetrators, and the authors of the study made no effort whatsoever to ask why some figures were not as they "should" have been.

What about this:

Country	Muslims	Percent
U.K.	1,640,958-2,000,000	2.7-3.3
Germany	4,413,639	4.9
Greece	139,182	1.3
Sweden	270,933	3

I took the figures from the Wikipedia entry about worldwide Islam. Notabene that they are from 2007, not 2001, and that they apply to the entire U.K. and not just to England and Wales. However, as this is a blog entry, not a post-doc project, they will have to do.

Can there be conclusions be drawn from this? Maybe. Here they are mine in no particular order. It shows (and I am sure that further figures for different countries will substantiate that) 3% of Muslim population seems to be a critical limit. It shows further, that the Brits are unable to control their Muslim population and to keep track of their population generally. But most of all, it shows that a modicum of knowledge about the countries one attempts to "analyze" is indispensable.

The number of reported rapes in Germany fell from 1984 to 1990, but increases from this year, although with year on year variation. This trend accelerates sharply with a 16 per cent increase between 1997 and 1998 although this decreases slightly in 1999 and 2000 before rising again in 2001. That said, however, the large increase one would expect following reunification, which almost doubled the population, is not evident in these figures.

Yes girls! That is, because there were very few Muslims living in the former GDR and those who were knew quite well that any antics about "religious freedom" and "freedom of speech" wouldn't have taken them all that far in Stalinist Germany, also, rape was rather frowned upon.

Duh!

First posted at Roncesvalles.

Jerusalem Post: As Topical As Timely

After some brief three years and a half, the Jerusalem Post has finally caught up with us. They print an interview with a member of the Iranian Basiji militia and thus confirm what we reported (did I say three and a half years ago?) earlier:

In a shocking and unprecedented interview, directly exposing the inhumanity of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's religious regime in Iran, a serving member of the paramilitary Basiji militia has told this reporter of his role in suppressing opposition street protests in recent weeks.

He has also detailed aspects of his earlier service in the force, including his enforced participation in the rape of young Iranian girls prior to their execution.

And here was I, thinking that men can't be forced against their will to have intercourse. But whatever. Maybe finally, at last, somebody maybe, perhaps will take notice.

Elsewhere, the publication of a guidebook for politicians, police and public servants on how to talk about Muslims and terrorism without implicating the religion of Islam was announced for the end of the year.

Edited to add:

Hat tip: A Daily Briefing on Iran and PI English.

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

A Tale of Two 31-Year Old Mothers

The repercussions for all of Germany following the murder of a 31-year old Muslim woman from Egypt by a passport-German from Russia in a German courtroom are remarkable and dramatic and remarkably dramatic. All honour killings and other crimes within the Muslim counter-culture, all killings, mutilations and beatings-up of Germans by our Muslim "culture enrichers" are, as far as they got any attention at all, forgotten. They were "isolated cases" anway, whereas for this, really isolated, case all Germans are held responsible, a crime committed by a man who wasn't even socialised within the evil "islamophobic" German culture.

Indeed, the media echo is stunning. A quick Google-search just for the name of the victim reveals amazing results. "Martyr", "headscarf" and "pregnant" are the feeds that mainly catch the eye. Of course, the German results are almost identical, with the German equivalents of "hate crime" and "racism" thrown in.

All of Germany is wallowing orgasmically, like swine wallow in dirt, in their own moral squalor. They love that.

And moral squalor it is indeed, just not in the way they see it.

The secretaries of both, the Central Council of Jews, convertite Stephan Kramer, and the Central Council Muslims in Germany, Aiman Mazyek, had the mutual enemy quickly identified and visited the widower together to express their sincere hypocrisy.

The French Figaro, so Gudrun Eussner informs me, quotes in today's print issue on page 7 the same Aiman Mazyek who states that "total (sic!) religious freedom" must be defended, part of which is the wearing of the headscarf:..."liberté réligieuse totale, dont fait partie le port du voile."

Has anybody still any doubt that we in the West are in a total (sic!) and global war with Islam?

Even such experts on human rights like Mahmud Ahmadinejad and the Iranian Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution (SCCR) chimed in, the latter issuing a statement saying the murder of Marwa al-Sherbini in Germany demonstrated the West’s disrespect to human rights.

And nobody laughed.

The most revealing aspect was, however, that even such an obscene extravaganza of German self-hatred and submission wasn't enough for the trailblazing whips (or rather: "whippettes") of dhimmitude. Andrea Dernbach, who has proven her ethical depth and moral prowess already by a justification of sex with children to clear Islam of the suspicion of homophobia, asked under the header "Germany's new hatred": "Why does the death of a woman wearing a headscarf – who wasn’t the victim of a so-called “honour killing” – spark so little interest in Germany?"

So far, so bad, but lately we seem even to export that specific brand of Islam-adoring journalettes, maybe because whatever Germans do, they do thoroughly. And indeed, under the even more incredible header "A murder that Germany ignored" a woman with a German-sounding name whines (in the Al Guardian, no less!) about what must be, I don't have any other explanation, the figment of an oestrogen-addled brain, and doesn't even shy away from repeating an outlandish, preposterous accusation from the Muslim media:

They [the German media] could have asked – as an Egyptian did – why Marwa's husband, while he was trying to help his wife, was shot and wounded by a policeman in the courtroom. Because he was not blond-haired?

I am not a prolific letter-to-the-editor-writer, but this time I couldn't help myself:

Your name suggests that you can read German. So you either have an agenda or you are out of your mind. The German media is, since that crime happened, in an orgiastic, self-hating frenzy. "Germans! She died for your sins!" And you are SERIOUSLY selling the above drivel to an unsuspecting Guardian readership? The day the countless ethnic Germans who are beaten to a pulp or killed by our Muslim culture enrichers get at least a fifth of the media attention this case got and it still getting, I will stop worrying what makes people like you tick.

Elsewhere, in Iran, the 31-year-old mother of two, Mohabat Mahmodi, will be executed within the next couple of days, because she killed her rapist in self-defense.*

And nobody cares. They are all too busy being outraged by German islamophobia.

---

*Information from an email by Mina Ahadi, exile-Iranian and secretary of the Central Council of Ex-Muslims in Germany.

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.