Question: "So, What About The Girl's Opinion" - Answer: "What Do You Mean?"
And, really, that title sums up what this War Against Islamofascism is all about Here's an interview, from a Kuwaiti television, with an Islamic expert advocating Female Genital Mutilation:
Interviewer: So what about the girl’s opinion?
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: What do you mean?
Interviewer: What if she says: I don’t want to be circumcised. What happens then?
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: If a girl says she doesn’t want it, she’s free. No problem.
Interviewer: Is this what happens in reality?
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: I have no relation to reality. I am talking about how things should be.
Interviewer: You are a religious sheik, from Al-Azahar University. You cannot say you have no relation to reality.
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: Reality is a mistake, we must rectify it. In Egypt we have four and a half million spinsters. The definition of a spinster is a woman who has reached 30, without ever receiving a marriage proposal. We have a spinster problem in the Arab world, and the last thing we want is for them to be sexually aroused.
Circumcision of the girls who need it makes them chaste, dignified, and pure.
Doesn't the sign at the Statue of Liberty says something about how we'll take your aroused spinsters, and your loose women, and your huddled masses of nymphomaniac?
I'd swear it does, and if it doesn't it ought to.
Interviewer: So what about the girl’s opinion?
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: What do you mean?
Interviewer: What if she says: I don’t want to be circumcised. What happens then?
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: If a girl says she doesn’t want it, she’s free. No problem.
Interviewer: Is this what happens in reality?
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: I have no relation to reality. I am talking about how things should be.
Interviewer: You are a religious sheik, from Al-Azahar University. You cannot say you have no relation to reality.
Dr. Muhammad Wahdan: Reality is a mistake, we must rectify it. In Egypt we have four and a half million spinsters. The definition of a spinster is a woman who has reached 30, without ever receiving a marriage proposal. We have a spinster problem in the Arab world, and the last thing we want is for them to be sexually aroused.
Circumcision of the girls who need it makes them chaste, dignified, and pure.
Doesn't the sign at the Statue of Liberty says something about how we'll take your aroused spinsters, and your loose women, and your huddled masses of nymphomaniac?
I'd swear it does, and if it doesn't it ought to.
6 Comments:
Yeah but these women will never get aroused because they've had their clits cut off.
Muzzie men regard women as clone-producers to be routinely inseminated like jerking off in a piece of raw liver.
When they want real passionate sex-response with mutual orgasm they screw goats or muff-dive sheep.
Arrogant and self-absorbed bastards!
AOW,
Is that what that is? I can't figure these guys out. I kind of doubt they actually perform cunnilingus on sheep, but I do think they are very sick.
Pastorius,
I was referring to the original article about female genital mutilation, not to the sheep. LOL.
I have a friend--let me call him "The Turk." His father was a Muslim, but not very devout and came to the U.S. to get away from the oppression in Turkey. Here he married an American woman, so my friend "The Turk" grew up Christian. "The Turk" has some interesting insights about Islam, and he feels that arrogance is at the root of many of the problems. He also frequently comments on Muslims' disregard for women.
You have to respect a 'civilization'that would butcher a girl in the name of god. I mean, it makes the other crap they do so much more understandable.
Muhammad loved little girls so much he married one.
Yeah. And we're the infidels.
Law is a complicated field that I can't summarise here, but I will write briefly that law is valid if it's based on codified universal benefit that doesn't allow for exceptionalism or privilege, and that it doesn't allow for discrimination against minorities in the face of majorities. One written law for all that allows for the greatest good for all and that doesn't allow harm to others. FGM might benefit the majority in some way, but it violates the rights of those mutilated, and I don't care if it's in the hadiths and acceptable to most Mulsims. Nor do I care if interference in the laws and customs of others violates their laws or our neutrality. If it's moral and good to mutilate Muslim girls, then it's good to mutilate all girls; but I fail to see the benefit to anyone, and since there is no benefit within the bounds of Human reason and decency, then fuck the butchers. No law on Earth should prevent us from stopping them at whatever cost. If we break our own laws in stoping FGM, then we pay the price, and I would think gladly so. We might go against our own in doing so, but such is the price we might pay for our Humanity.
Not a one of us is going to make a difference over-all, so it means we must unite to stop this outrage. No one is a law unto himself. It takes us all to make law. And it takes us all to enforce it. If we lose the struggle, bad law will prevail. If we win, things will be less bad for many. That's worth fighting for.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home