The West is on a dangerous course. It has embarked on a dichotomous journey. It is on the road to self-destruction.
There are two mutually exclusive forces at play here: On the one hand, there are the liberals who are trying to be more open to other cultures, and who are trying to destroy the very institutions upon which the West has thrived for so long; and on the other, we have a frightfully conservative force at work in the form of Islam, whose adherents are trying to take us back to mediæval times, take us back to a bygone age.
The one side, the liberal side, for example, is trying to give gays rights, and destroy the institution of marriage; the other, the conservative, Islamic side, a growing force in our society, will try and undo all the liberal policies ever passed. Normal conservatives in the Western sense of the world will look like the screaming liberals of today in years to come, for their brand of conservatism is as nothing in comparison with the ultra conservative, ‘orthodox’ Islamic values that will be foisted upon our unsuspecting people when Islam grows ever more in strength here in the West.
We are on a road that leads to no good place. This journey is one which will end in tears.
It should be increasingly obvious to all thinking people that we have allowed a people to immigrate to the West who, by and large, have no intention of integrating into Western societies, and who wish to change the nature of Western societies into their own, pre-conceived notion of how a society should be – a society which conforms to the extremely strict codes of behaviour as set out in the Shari’ah.
Ask yourself how these two forces can be reconciled! Of course, they cannot be. The one is modern and forward-thinking; the other is 1400 years old, and belongs to the Dark Ages. Nobody, however intelligent, however resourceful, is going to be able to bring about such a reconciliation of such competing forces. And the longer this problem is allowed to fester, the more difficult it will become to solve.
Already we have seen demonstrators out in the streets in their droves demanding that anyone who insults Islam be beheaded! Already we have seen calls for the introduction of Shari’ah law here in the UK and in Europe. Already we know that the ultimate goal of Muslims in the United States is to introduce it there, too; and to replace the Constitution with an Islamic one. Omar M Ahmad, the then Chairman of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), stated the following as far back as 1988:
”Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”
That says it all!
The French author, Michelle Houellebecq, in an interview given to the French literary magazine Lire, said the following: ”The dumbest religion, after all, is Islam. When you read the Koran, you’re shattered. The Bible at least is beautifully written because the Jews have a heck of a literary talent.”
Michelle Houellebecq might well have had it right about Islam; but aren’t we Westerners the dumbest people of all to allow these Muslim immigrants to come here to the West and live off the fat of the land and tell us that they are going to take us over, tell us that their religion is going to become dominant, tell us that Shari’ah law is going to be introduced at the earliest convenience, and so on?
I mean: How stupid and tolerant can we be?
Look, it’s really quite simple. Islam brooks no compromise: It is their way or no way. This is quite, quite clear now to all sensible, aware people. Clearly, these people have no appetite for assimilation, and they are not going to change.
What they want to do is to bring Islam to every corner of the world, and they are on a mission to achieve this. We have to decide whether we want to live their backward way, or whether we want to fight for our liberty and democracy, concepts anathema to Muslims all over the globe. We cannot have it all ways, we cannot, as they say, have our cake and eat it too.
Tough decisions are never easy to take. It takes a person of determination and resolve to take them. But when faced with this dilemma, it is only tough decisions that will do. Or are we going to slip and slide, through inaction, down the road to dhimmitude, or ultimate surrender to Islam. Are we going to submit to Allah, are we going to pay the jizyah, or the tax on infidels, or are we going to allow our fellow citizens to be killed. For those are so clearly the only three options once Islam takes hold.
Moreover, imagine what sort of society we shall be forced to live in. Adulteresses will be stoned to death, beheadings will take place in the public square, thieves will have their hands and feet cut off alternately, and homosexuals will be hanged in the street, or thrown off the local minaret! If you don’t believe me, take a trip to Saudi Arabia or Iran. In those countries, you will see just what happens to such people.
We have gone badly wrong. We have allowed into our societies people quite unwilling to assimilate. Interestingly, these backward people are convinced of their own superiority! Isn’t that an interesting phenomenon?
If we value our Judeo-Christian culture, if we value our freedoms, if we value our democracies, if we value our civilized way of life, if indeed we value our civilization, then we have but one option, for there truly is only one way to solve this intractable problem. We have to start thinking about the repatriation of these difficult people.
We start by repatriating the illegal, Muslim immigrants, and those who preach hatred and the destruction of our civilization. That will be a good start. We really do not have to put up with this nonsense any longer. Enough is enough!
The repatriation can take place in a humane manner; we don’t need to be cruel. We can even give these people money to resettle somewhere else. But believe me, repatriation is the only sensible option at this stage. We cannot afford to play fast and loose with our children’s future. We have a duty to our children to leave them our Western civilization as free and whole as we inherited it. To do anything else would be a dereliction of our duty.
Repatriation is not an option of the far right only. This is not a question of left and right politics anyway. This is a fight for the survival of the West. We must step up to the plate. We must behave with strength, resolve, and determination. Only when we do so will we silence these people. For make no mistake about it, Muslims understand one thing, and one thing only: Strength!
©Mark Alexander*
*All rights reserved
8 comments:
As shown by Jack Straw's comments, by the Windsor wielders of pitchforks (or should I call them, in honor of one of our bloggers, villagers with torches) and by the Danes intrepidly doing cartoons again, it is clear that the grassroots are growing in the awareness of the danger you describe.
But not the treetops. Not the governments in the West (except Australia), not the EU, not even the Bush administration. Not the policymakers in the US State Department, and not the mindshapers in the towers of academe. Those are either allied to the enemy, or hobbled against fighting it by the burden of the tax to be paid to political correctness (right from the aftermath of 9/11: "Operation Infinite Justice" changed to "Operating Enduring Freedom" so as not to offend Muslim sensibilities).
The people are either awake or waking up in droves. The leaders--that's our problem. Our big problem. We're cursed with unsuitable leaders. We're set back by grown baby-boomers who see everything from the old, and irrelevant, lens of racial conflict and class warfare. If we're ever to make steps toward victory, those inept leaders will have to go first, and be replaced by newer people who are not weighted down by the legacy of Cold War thinking.
What a wonderful comment! I couldn't agree with you more!
Thanks, I think we've reached the stage where instilling ideological self-confidence is working its effect and now operative suggestions are more badly needed. In the operative front, I feel like we're a host of people with the right ideas but banging against the wall of having the wrong people in positions of real, state-reaching power.
Great essay, Mark. Are you heartened by the fact that the UK Metro Police Chief has used the word "internment."
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2006/10/did-someone-say-internment.html
I agree with you we don't need to be cruel. I like you approach.
Zionist Youngster:
It does seem as though opinions are slowly beginning to change, doesn't it? They are hardening. And that's a good thing. But as you say: We've got to find a way of reaching the law-makers at the top.
Pastorius:
Great essay, Mark. Are you heartened by the fact that the UK Metro Police Chief has used the word "internment."
Thank you for your compliment. And yes I am heartened by that statement from the UK Metro Police Chief. About time too! Internment should have taken place right after 9/11. That would have set the trend. The way things were handled was disgraceful.
Gormless Norman:
What about the North Pole? They'd need their beards and burqahs to keep warm up there!
Gormless Norman:
Funnily enough, I also thought something similar. Sir Ian, in the past, has uttered some very pro-Muslim things. I seem to remember his stressing the point after the London bombings that the bombings had nothing at all to do with the Muslim faith, or some such inanity.
So if he has said this, he certainly has had a change of heart. But of course, he's in the know; so if he has had info that a terrible attack is in the offing, then he might possibly have come to see that internment might be the only option. It's difficult to judge the veracity of this story.
Post a Comment