Do you believe in magic? And not in a young girl's heart. Annapolis, the Arabs, Iran the NIE and CIA and State

Events do not occur in a vacuum.
Sometimes when a series of inexplicable events occur we can give rise to our weakness for the conspiracy theory. Even for flights of fantasy. So let's fantasize about the impossible.

1. Olmert keeps on praising the holocaust minimizer Abbas
2. Olmert mumbles things about Jerusalem going to the Arabs amid avalanches of rumors
3. Condi becomes a palestinian
4. Annapolis is designed, with Foreign Ministers of Arab states showing up to treat them 'kikes' with the najas those freaking dhimmis deserve

The only intuitively obvious reason for this set of cataclysmic stupidities would be that Olmert et al really believe giving the drueling murderers land will satiate their desire for dead, or dhimmi jews. Maybe Farfour will be happy.
Is that credible?
Is there no one in the Israeli govt hardheaded enough to dissent LOUDLY and kill any such plan?
I just don't believe the state of Israel would commit suicide in this way. Too much resistance among the citizens. This is not equivalent to appeasement, this would be Stanley Baldwin ceding Kent to Hitler for a respite from Churchill's pounding. So one has to wonder if there is something else.

1. Annapolis occurs as expected with Livni treated as a leprous Heidi Fleiss at a Methodist ministers' wives meeting to end Viagra commercials and get smiling, confident Bob off TV.
2. Olmert mumbles away platitudinous spew filled with sugar free gelatin.
3. Arabs walk away from Annapolis. Jews walk away from Annapolis.
4. Everyone wonders what the hell it was for
   
5. George Soros has lunch with the American UN Ambassador
6. The americans put out a UN resolution the arabs have agreed to and the Israelis not only have not seen, but also know NOTHING about endorsing the 'result' of Annapolis ('peace' by 12/31/2008)
7. Now suddenly comes the NIE

How does all this fit together?
Has this administration been suborned by the dream palace of Arabists and James Baker-ism, and made some promises to Israel to manufacture that which cannot be, and that the NIE has shown the Israelis the Americans cannot keep?

Were promises made to Israel to deal with Iran if they gave up what the Arabs required? Did the release of the NIE to the executive (remember Bush telling David Gregory he learned of the NIE two weeks ago, during Bush's press conference?), but not yet made public ...which HAD to be released to the Israelis since it would become public --- Did the Israelis taking ONE look and realizing that this destroyed any chance of Bush moving against Iran then pull everything off the table?



Would you like to have cogent explanation for all this?

On thing we do know, the CIA ( a la Michael Scheurer) and the State Dept (from George Marshall, to Howard Baker to today) feel that if we adopted as our own, the barbarous family gas stations the way we did, and instead of Israel, our national security situation would be much better with these stable, freedom loving, value sharing, .....

I mean, we would have been so much better off if we had helped our friendly neighborhood fascist South American dictators in 1982, and thrown those colonial allies of Great Britain to the wolves when they tried to reclaim the Falklands and South Georgia, .................right?

I mean what are shared values among those purporting to be allies, when other considerations intervene?