The Long March through the institutions has culminated. We now have a president whose talk of healing and post racial bipartisanship belies a never ending negative campaign of making any opponent racist and and extremist, and a self arrogating surety of purpose in transforming this nation away from the Bill of Rights while assuring the people he would never do that.
Just YESTERDAY we had Chuck Schumer call the NRA and extremist fringe group. The Tea Party, an conglomerate entity whose entire existence is in doubt past the two issues of financial responsibility and adherence to the Constitution MUST be racist in nature.
And now West Point is teaching those who serve that people who demand the federal govt be the limited service it was intended to be by the founders are THE DANGER.
Is it then LESS paranoid to imagine the purpose of such education is to make it easier for those who serve to FIRE ON THE PEOPLE?
West Point center cites dangers of ‘far right’ in U.S.
A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Centerat the U.S. Military Academyat West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”Thecenter— part of the institution where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday. It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”The West Point center typically focuses reports on al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence.But its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”
So who is far right?
“While liberal worldviews are future- or progressive -oriented, conservative perspectives are more past-oriented, and in general, are interested in preserving the status quo.” the report says. “The far right represents a more extreme version of conservatism, as its political vision is usually justified by the aspiration to restore or preserve values and practices that are part of the idealized historical heritage of the nation or ethnic community.”The report adds: “While far-right groups’ ideology is designed to exclude minorities and foreigners, the liberal-democratic system is designed to emphasize civil rights, minority rights and the balance of power.”
7 comments:
In other words, if we don't agree with "Hope and Change", and we aren't ready to march "Forward" - off the cliff - then we are Far Right Racists, Terrorists, and dangerous anti-Federalist activists.
Fuck Obama.
Exactly Pasto see the following:
First Amendment Terrorist: Pentagon Says Protests Are Acts of “Low Level Terrorism”
http://www.mfs-theothernews.com/2013/01/first-amendment-terrorist-pentagon-says.html
Perhaps . . .or perhaps not as evidenced on the empty streets during the coronation. . .
via FreeRepublic comment thread / Smithsonian live cam: DC streets are empty. Where are all of Hussein’s supporters-- his speech is supposed to start in a little over an hour! What a flop!?
I, for one, am proud to be considered a dangerous anti-federalist activist.
Outs us in some pretty damn good company over the last 240 or so years.
Perhaps we should rename the blog Dangerous Anti-Federalism.
Or Dangerous anti-Federalist, Beer Drinkers, Whiskey Swillers and Hell Raisers.
I like that.
I'm reading Wafa Sultan's "A God who Hates" once more (I do it every time I start feeling doubtful about "moderates", and I found the answer to the intensity and apparent blindness of the useful idiots and their leaders.
I found it in the words of a Syrian writer, Nabil Fayyad, quoted by Ms. Sultan:"The more fragile an idea is, the more terrifying its defenders are."
As for your name, stick with the Infidel one. There is a Crusade going on, in the full extent of the word. And once again, it was brought to life by the same hatred, brutality and inhuman nature of Islam. And so far, there are not too many Crusaders to fight against fanatics who had six or seven decades to orchestrate their attack.
I understand your rage as to what's happening to the country, and you may have to fight on two fronts, but the counter-Jihad Crusade cannot be left unattended. I think people will wake up soon enough at what's happening in the country, but the stealth jihad is a different business.
According to Frank Gaffney, stealth jihad had not even registered in Romney's radar ... What can we expect from Joe Doe who watches Jersey Shore?
Post a Comment