Thursday, June 12, 2014

Everyone CHILL and concentrate on calm rhetoric towards removal- if that's what you believe is compulsory

AND IT MAY BE.

The rhetoric level is starting to remind me of something. And not just here (IBA).
The assassination of Israeli Prime Minister and Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin was the culmination of Israeli right-wing dissent over the Oslo peace process. Rabin, despite his extensive service in the Israeli military, was disparaged personally by right-wing conservatives and Likud leaders who perceived the Oslo peace process as an attempt to forfeit the occupied territories.
Now, I believe the facts justify that B Obama is the worst president in American history - EASILY.

I believe the last few weeks and months have demonstrated why he said 'fundamentally transform'.

I believe the last few weeks and months have demonstrated he and those who follow his ideas are a danger to the republic.

But I also believe the absolute WORST THING that could happen to those who oppose B Obama and his ideas would be if something HAPPENED to B Obama.

Our words, our mien, our demeanor should reflect this at all times.

His actions now over ILLEGAL immigration and his proposed actions to legalize this swarming into the USA for reasons of federal monetary support by both failure to adhere to his Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution, and ESPECIALLY NOW avoidance of Congress in pursuit of allowing illegal immigration (by pen), COMPOUNDED by his obvious desire to empty Gitmo by violating an UNCHALLENGED law he signed via some Prez finding, may be the last straw that cracks open consideration of impeachment.

But we should be sure each and every time we mention our visceral opposition to this man's ideas and his destructive behavior we ensure we say NOTHING MUST HAPPEN TO HIM outside the Constitution.

NOTHING.
EVER.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Agree.

Impeachment of Obama is a non-starter. As with Clinton it will only make him stronger.

The solution for the next 2 plus years is for state governors to find their 10th amendment spines.

DC has gone a long time without a serious challenge to their arrogance. If their bluff is called by someone who means it, by someone willing to endure the fight like Walker did in Wisconsin, I believe they will back down.

Violence, even violent rhetoric, will only hurt the cause of liberty at this stage.

Pastorius said...

He is RESPONSIBLE for a HUMANITARIAN CRISIS.

He CREATED A CRISIS for his own POLITICAL ENDS.

TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN are being used as PAWNS.

There is no calm way to say that, and the danger is that if it is not said TRUTHFULLY AND CLEARLY, the point will be missed.... as it currently is.

The right-wing media (those of hyped up words and outrageous racism and all that hogwash) they are not telling the true story.

So how are the American people going to know, unless lunatics like me first start telling the truth in as clear and concise a manner as I possibly can.

Do you deny that the way I described the situation is accurate?

Are the words heated?

Or are they accurate?

Pastorius said...

To our Anonymous commenter,

Is it ok with you that the American President is creating a humanitarian crisis for his own political ends, and that that crisis involves tens of thousands of children?

Remember, this is the American President we are talking about?

Always On Watch said...

Chill out for 2.5 more years?

Some of those illegal invaders (children) are going to be placed in Baltimore in an SSA warehouse (no AC and probably few bathrooms) on Green Street, which is right in the heart of the drug trade in Baltimore if I remember my city geographically correctly.

What is Obama going to do next?

After amnesty, that it.

Pastorius said...

Let me be clear, I do not fear illegal aliens, or amnesty. I do not fear that.

That will not destroy our country.

What will destroy our country is an absolutely lawless and immoral man running the country.

Anonymous said...

EPIC - Trey Gowdy gets a standing ovation on House Floor - 'We Make Law!'

Now, how do we ENFORCE our established law?

Always On Watch said...

From The New Dumping Grounds: The administration quietly redistributes illegal aliens through military bases:

It seems that two planeloads of illegal aliens were recently shipped to Massachusetts. The first reportedly landed at Hanscom Air Force Base in Bedford. According to my tipster, approximately 160 illegal immigrants arrived on that flight and stayed nearly a week before being transferred to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) site and then released.

The second flight reportedly was diverted from Hanscom to Boston’s Logan Airport this past weekend....

[...]

...[C]ountless illegal aliens are being released into the general public despite testing positive for tuberculosis...


Much more at the above link.

If all this is true, then what is happening is an invasion. Ivory towers won't stand for long under such an assault.

Always On Watch said...

Pasto,
I do not fear illegal aliens, or amnesty. I do not fear that.

That will not destroy our country.



I must disagree, particularly IF the numbers are high enough and if there are criminal-type elements among some of the those teenagers.

I suspect mass illiteracy among those teens as well -- certainly illiteracy when it comes to English. And do they have any skill sets that can contribute anything to our society?

How many of the girls age 13+ are already pregnant or working actively on becoming pregnant so as to have anchor babies.

Always On Watch said...

Is Obama giving even one red cent from his own personal wealth to help these whom he has afflicted?

Make no mistake. This humanitarian crisis is evil -- and Obama's doing.

Have we ever seen anything like this "mass migration" before here in America?

I've read that entire villages in Central America are now empty. If so, you can bet the region is now under the control of the drug cartels. These people who have come here have no place to which to return!

Anonymous said...

Photos of these "children" reveal many are teens with adults scattered among them. My concern is the OTM component blending with the Latino crowd. Central and South America have developed hubs of Hezbollah and alQaeda over the last dozen or so years.

Always On Watch said...

Is anyone here at IBA going to take in one or more of these children?

Seriously.

I'm asking.

Are YOU -- you personally -- willing to take in a 14-year-old from Central America?

A 16-year-old?

A 10-year-old?

Care for (health care, too), educate, etc.?

Do you personally know ANYONE who will take in one of these immigrants? Anyone who has done so -- even in years past?

Anonymous said...

To AOW: Yes absolutely I would take in one or more of those children as I outlined in these pages yesterday. I believe every member of my church (RC) should step forward and volunteer.

However I'm sure the progressives would do everything in their power to prevent me and mine from doing so. They believe that a Catholic upbringing is tantamount to child abuse. They are already mobilizing to provide these kids with family planning options and sexual orientation counseling. Seriously, you can google it.



Anonymous said...

Link to support my comment above:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/06/11/HHS-Grantees-Sheltering-Illegal-Alien-Children-Must-Provide-Family-Planning-

Pastorius said...

The most obvious objection to Epa's post just occurred to me.

Unless I do not understand my history correctly, Rabin did not commit Treason against Israel, and Rabin was not an evil, lawless man.

Epaminondas said...

Actually, Pasto, according to MANY Rabin DID thru the Oslo accords, and his attitude about west bank settlements, and the rhetoric, and degree of vilification is PRECISELY the reason for this post.

This is the BEST light:
The assassin was Yigal Amir, a former Hesder student and far-right law student at Bar-Ilan University. Amir had strenuously opposed Rabin's peace initiative, particularly the signing of the Oslo Accords, because he felt that an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank would deny Jews their “biblical heritage which they had reclaimed by establishing settlements.” Amir had come to believe that Rabin was a rodef, meaning a "pursuer" who endangered Jewish lives. The concept of din rodef ("law of the pursuer") is a part of traditional Jewish law. Amir believed he would be justified under din rodef in removing Rabin as a threat to Jews in the territories.

In fact tho, many in Israel accused him of treason.

I am sure our Secret Service would never allow an approach like what happened to Rabin, but any LOON ....

That is why I posted what I did. I believe it is enough to lay out the facts with using the conclusive accusations.

Illegal immigration swarms
Iraq
VA
IRS repressions
Taliban trades
Afghanistan policy on identical path as Iraq
Demonization, and attempts to stigmatize of R's
Failure to carry out the laws HE signed
On and on

But I think it is VERY dangerous in this atmosphere which seems to be more polarized every single day to call him a traitor with each incident

Not just to him, and he IS president, but to what WE wish to see both accomplished and changed.

Especially inside a volatile and emotional set of low info voters.

Just think about this for a few days. You don't need to answer

Always On Watch said...

Anonymous,
I commend you on your Christian spirit.

But let me ask you this....Do you realize that some of these children are not what one might term "innocent children"?

Most are, IMO. But not all. Significant "rehabilitation" will be required. Also, the matter of antibiotic TB and other threats to public health (and a household's health) must be addressed.

I have a friend who adopted an orphan from Guatemala when the little girl was 5 years old. It's a good thing that my friend has unlimited disposable money because this girl, now age 14, has MAJOR and chronic medical issues. And, yes, learning issues too -- some obviously neurological damage (for whatever reason).

Also, anyone taking in any of these children needs to be nearly fluent in Spanish (my friend is, and her daughter now speaks English) so as to "keep tabs" on the child(ren).

I'm not saying, "Don't do it." But I am saying, "Know what you're getting into."

Not that I believe you will be allowed to adopt one of these children. You might get to foster for a year or so.

Pastorius said...

Epa,

I don't see any suits being brought against Obama, with regard to these grave issues, by Congress, the Justice Dept. or any other entity which might be entitled to bring such a suit.

Do we even have an Independent Counsel on Benghazi, or Fast and Furious yet?

To my knowledge, no.

I don't know what we're supposed to do, when there is no justice forthcoming.

And, even if there were Justice, one would assume there would first be charges filed.

What would those charges be?

They are, as I say, grave crimes.

Benghazi, Fast and Furious, and now this Population Transfer, are resulting in deaths.

Pastorius said...

Remember, if Obama wanted to do so, and if he hadn't actually orchestrated this Population Transfer, then he could simply call a Press Conference and announce to South America that all these children coming in now will NOT be given papers, they will be sent back.

But Obama will not do that because he has orchestrated this. He wants it this way.

He is treating people as chattel. Political slaves.

Epaminondas said...

there is only 1 rectification available, if prez cannot be compelled by a citizen thru courts and scotus to comply with the law.

But we simply need to say high crimes and misdemeanors are thus and such he did and go from there, but if you knew the cost would be much greater and more polarized support for him (as it was for Clinton), would you proceed on principle? Or would u accumulate causes for a Republican prez in 2016.

I only care about winning the next 2 election cycles. If we have an R legislature set, and he keeps vetoing, or acts on his own amid congressional legislative opposition, he will have a new set of problems and he will drive votes to the R's simply out of accumulated arrogance.