I used to think Obama was simply a bit naieve, now I know he is a dangerous fool
According to Obama we can't win in Iraq where there are insurgents and a civil war culled from a population of 21 million, but he wants to go on and take on the Pakistanis with 170 million?
Since we can't lick the Iraqis, lets (in the future words of the new left of left of left, no doubt moveonover.org) trigger a civil war amongst the deobandi pushtun baluchi sind malevolences we should have understood before we invaded another country that had nothing to do with 9/11?
Listen, I think we ought kill all bastards border free, but this is the Mount Everest of hypocrisy.
WASHINGTON -said Wednesday that he would possibly send troops into to hunt down terrorists, an attempt to show strength when his chief rival has described his foreign policy skills as naive.
The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen.that he must do more to shut down terrorist operations in his country and evict foreign fighters under an Obama presidency, or Pakistan will risk a U.S. troop invasion and losing hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. military aid.
"Let me make this clear," Obama said in a speech prepared for delivery at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. "There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out anleadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
Run of the mill politician
I'm not sure who is more of a naive fool ..he and his advisors, or anyone who can swallow this emeitc brew and not gag.