Obama! The most un-American Kenyan Indonesian American one world candidate you can get. (I think what he meant to say, is We should all learn to speak Arabic)
What galls me is how he smugly laughs contemptuously at the American people. Watch the video.
What galls me is how he smugly laughs contemptuously at the American people. Watch the video.
From the blog, what you need to know about Barack Obama
Obama's book in the West is titled 'The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on reclaiming the American Dream'.
The Indonesian version of obama's book is translated as "assault (or attack) on hope (or expectation): from jakarta to the white house".
Indonesia, the largest Muslim country in the world, is where Obama was raised and attended a madrassa from the ages of 6 to 11. He moved to where his grandma (the one he threw under the bus, sent him to the finest elite private school in Hawaii -- so when you here he grew up on the mean streets of the south side of Chicag- remember it's a media lie).
to the western mind the two words 'assault' and 'hope' together make no sense at all. but to the muslim mind combining the words 'assault' and 'hope' do have meaning (if you are aware of what is in the koran): 'a hopeful assault' means jihad.
Wake Up, America.
"A correct translation of the title of obama's book would have been "keberanian harapan: pemikiran untuk meraih kembali impian america" which translates into "audacity of hope: thoughts on reclaiming the american dream". however, the title for the indonesian translation of barack obama's book is "menerjang harapan: dari jakarta menuju gedung putih" which translates into "assault hope: from jakarta to the white house." ( source: an american expat in southeast asia ).
19 comments:
Pastorius,
As if we already had reason enough not to vote for him!
Obama is a strange man.
Pastorius,
Obama is a PC leftwing statist! No matter what he says.
He is starting to convince me that he may be something much worse.
I think I will buy both of his books and read them.
Pastorius,
I hope you'll be able to go to sleep at night and not be kept awake by fear!
You know your blog, and the reason or how I found you, is one if a few, that has made those connections with Obama and Kenya [I have some good links to the daily reports on Kenya on the WAMI blog, on the left blog roll]
AND
to the ties to Indonesia. During my days working in far left I would go between Maoism/or Leninism, in study, never joined any Maoist party but I did keep up with the Maoist movement, and the change within the MIM especially in how they are tied, no, converted over to Islam, is extremely concerning, and I do mean in a really big way.
And I will tell you even in the left-far left in America there is a lot of ignorance of just how deep this infiltration goes and how much the influence on party propaganda is actually coming from the far east, not China, no, Indonesia, Malaysia,Philliphines,(sic) etc. And I'm not referring to the 60s influence either...
its extremely deceptive how they use their propaganda to lure the west/young westerners esp, and I'll give you two examples,
the Chiapas and the Nepalese revolution, especially on women's rights and human rights because there has been gross violations of both within the Nation States against the peoples,
so what this does is it creates this type of psychology, remember most don't Read now days, unless its sound bytes or revisionist interpretation of dialectics, etc., but what this does is this creates a mindset within the left/progressives included, that the struggle is not a totalitarian one but a struggle for human rights,
its not until you dig, really Dig and get into the foreign comminicato that you find out what is really the 'goal' behind these friendly faces.
The MIM is nothing but a butchering Po Pot [Khmer Rough] Islamist type of revolution, and they are Worse, believe it or not,
than Hezbollah. Thats what makes Obama EXTREMELY DANGEROUS.
And the influence of Pol Pot was influenced by Stalinism--similar to the Black Liberation Marxists-Kenya.
One other thing too, there is little to No discourse within the left or focus on the genocide against the East Timorese by Indonesia,
why? We know why of course, but the majority in the left here do not know...the Australians have a better grasp of that part of the world, it would be wise,
to bring out the focus on the Indonesian Islamists and what they did to the Catholics in that region, and reason for this---
look at the high percentage of Catholic Latino/a voters in this country--this is Why the far left has jumped in, Along with the Islamists, with the immigrants rights movement--they work side by side,
the Islamists dupe these people, and there is little if any knowledge of the genocide-butchering of Catholics in the far east, within the Latino community.
Especially the forced fgms on Catholic women done by the Islamists--
it would be wise to bring up some research on the ties between America/the East and Suharto/the Islamists during the invasion of East Timor--
and then the aftermath and the expansion of those splinter groups [Islamist] that occurred as a result of, follow the money trail too,
and then, put the publications in Spanish. Because they are 'using' the Latino struggle for their jihad,
and they are succeeding because there is no information going out to the Latino community about the slaughters in Asia by none other than the very MIM that claims
to be working on their behalf. Those who have some knowledge of the betrayals by the Maoists in Columbia and Peru may know [though those opposing states are not much better],
but the strategics and the types of societies in Peru/Columbia are different compared to, East Timor and that region of the world and therefore the justifications they [left] might use are full of holes.
to be frank, its the disenfranchisment of the Latinos in America by the right--that is working to the Islamist advantage, its no coincidence that the Azteca groups/supporters of, and yes the Azteca is a bonified nationalist group that is extremely anti-Semitic,
has leadership in left parties And is a strong academic influence within the Chicano studies...
remember something--they succeed when working in societies that have already an absolute and extreme or near extreme misogynist framework [or machismo],
this is how they are utilizing that whole 'self-determination' polemic to their advantage--but they do so, with the clever covering up of the reality of what they carry out as they progress--that means to an end.
You can't fight them by using the liberation ideology of freedom, because they've seen the hypocrisy in that--BUT,
you can fight them [the propaganda] by exposing the truth as to what they do once they have power or they are in a place,
to smash Mother Mary to smitherines...[get my drift],
the right/or anti-Islamists need to get THOSE TRUTHS out,
and not just in English, get them out in Spanish. This may seem silly, but remember, the fastest growing segment of population in the west,
is none other than the Hispanic-Latino Catholic community and I don't think they'd take too kind to the realization that the MIM and their Islamist ilk,
have in store for them. The evidence is the horrors their Catholic brothers and sisters, sisters especially have suffered and are still, in
East Timor and surrounding areas.
Natasha
Director of WAMI
http://wami-womenagainstmaleimperialism.blogspot.com/
Natasha,
Thank you
Natasha,
Will you leave your email address for me?
one other thing--this is Why there is a need for a third camp, meaning,
not just fighting the Islamists only on the right, believe it or not, there are many on the left who are also seeing this, independents, feminists, but there isn't that political stage for them, including on the cyber stage per se
because the infiltration by the anti-west/Islamists is so deeply entrenched in the left, even in the anarchist camps, its not even funny,
in America, I can't speak for Europe but I'm sure its similar.
IF we are going to be in any place to beat these bastards, excuse the french, we have to know strategies and how to use them, some of the right wing's strategies are good, But,
they are limited, polarized and the Islamist camp and their 'utilizers of' have advantage over on several aspects--But they have Achilles heels, believe me they do,
but you can't fight them using the old Cold War rhetoric which is what many in the right are doing. You got to get in there and 'undermine' their use of psychology via their propaganda and activism to throw that 'shadow of a doubt',
in the minds of the duped. You see the problem is the lack of in depth education on political development and world history and culture, Why the revisionists and the multi-culturalists have been able so sell their distorted truths,
they don't just lie, they distort truths using injustices, legit injustices, for their gain and people fall for it.
The book by Obama, reads like My Struggle, [Hitler] but uses different language.
Any time one attempts to talk logically about Obama or the threat of Islam the first thing that the propagandists do is say, thats right wing xenophobic the 'oh you're class enemy' type of logic,
then the subtle purging of reason, thats how they do it. And I will say, the longer I explore the connections or connect the dots so to speak, the more I have a suspicion that this development has been in works for a very very long time,
someone said here that they thought Russia and China were using the Islamists to weaken the west,
partly true, but its more than that,
the far left/or Stalinist-MIM camp is using the Islamists today similar to how Lenin used the Anarchists then...not to just weaken the west--
BUT TO RID THE WORLD OF ANY OR ALL OPIATES, religion, believe it or not that is in Any way, Any way, familiar with the principles and/or ideologies of western thought.
They couldn't do away with religion, and in fact couple of years ago Avakian [RCP] did a workshop of sorts on this, him and a few others coming out of Castro's Cuba and South America, Ortega, good example there,
they realized they couldn't get rid of religion, its always been this obstacle, and the fall of the Eastern bloc with the huge solidarity chants of 'we want god, we want god',
left an imprint. But there was and is one religion, that they could utilize, that could even possibly live according to Marxist [their interpretation of, which is Extremely twisted] structure of society,
and there you go. Not only that, but the Islamists had too, adapted and assimilated the guerrilla warfare of the Maoists and Soviets and combined with the already expansionist infrastructure [which has a LOT to do with why women are subjugated and are baby machines in Islam],
combine the two and what do you have? But see there is one flaw, as always the far left overestimates their dependence on analyzing everything down to the material dialectic--they underestimate the fanaticism of Islam,
that is why there is a two way approach, and ready for this,
by their use of humanism and women's rights to undermine Islamist society--they've attempted thus in the past, yes, and its been their downfall, eg., Algeria, Ethiopia and Somalia and Iraq.
But those societies all had something in common, similar to Sudan,
agarian societies, not developed societies--
why they Need and want to infiltrate America and establish an Islamic state, Europe too,
then they would have the power to crush the Islamists [or this is what they think/strategy],
ironically however, Islam in principle is more compatable (sic) with corporatist capitalism...why the MIM and the Stalinist camp don't like it when you bring up and critique/break down their fallacy using the 'slavery' realities,
that puts a big hole in their propaganda b.s. Women's rights not so much--because the far left has only 'used' women's rights as an agenda to use women as a war machine--another reason they've lumped in with the Islamists, its one of the reasons the Islamists kicked their asses in Africa, they won't give up their 'booty',
if you get my drift--so, assimilation was next in order. Thats why there is the apologetics and triviliazing (sic)or reducing oppression to just 'culture'.
I can almost bet, the measures Obama will take if he gets elected and sadly I think he will--
he'll diminish gun ownership rights, weaken or remove the possibility to arm against police state forces [see how UK police forces are changing..add it up]
OR, or, they'll manipulate to bring about a civil war-conflict, most likely using 'race' to do so. They've already accomplished this on a social level in this election.
and then, his 'creative class',
luring the progressive bourgousie (sic) yuppies, watch the environmental movement and those fringe groups,
by the time they weaken the state of the working class even if the working class was to form solidarity they'd be too divided based on racial tensions to do anything--
the right cannot afford to be polarized or elitist any longer...NOT if we are going to crush this rise of totalitarianism,
its going to have to come from the average joe and susy, hear what I'm saying, because there are elites within the right too, that are also taking advantage, its profit,
[ex Saudi, Iran, Oman investments, Dubai]
If there was Ever a time in history for the non-political to wake up its now. Though what is scary is how it was in WWII/prior how the rise of fascism was assisted by those who moved into the political stage...
but we may need a strong force to oppose the forces at work now, the more I study/read the epoch WWI to WWII, and even prior to,
the more I think thats what it will take. Not sure though, I'm still contemplating that--I will say though, that there is too much reliance on the war of ideas, to defeat Islamist expansion, and that is good,
but its not enough. Not nearly enough...its Too much of a threat, and I Cannot emphasis this enough,
through out history, the Islamists have sat back and observed, they study and they watch, then they assimilate, and they take and adapt--warfare especially, they infiltrate then they rise up...and most are aware of that fact, yes,
BUT what they don't take advantage of, is the cognitive dissonance that is always that conflict, not only that,
but it is their hanging on to the old--[and I won't go into detail here for obvious reasons] but, there are serious, serious weaknesses in their armor--
not physical hear what I'm saying,
what we are doing is playing 'catch up', the defense,
what we need to start doing, is a offense--before they even know what hits them.
Third Camp--strategy and an underground one at that--exploiting what is needed, speaking strategically--
if the right were smart--they'd utilize the anger within the Hilary camp right now...and they'd cut some of those ties with the elites who pull their strings--what the right needs,
is a Dynamic leader. Hate to say it but I don't think McCain is it...but they need a Dynamic leader who is from the grass roots--not so tied in with the right wing infrastructure, in other words,
they need to let go of the Burkian methodology, same goes for Europe. Remember, what is always to the advantage in war,
is to either surround a weakened populus [Sudan good example] or
to divide and conquer. and Obama's camp has already excelled at that, what will be the final blow is when that camp as they Always do and Always have,
begins to rid and/or purge those they no longer find
necessary.
Time to get ahead of them--rather than following behind.
email--
wamiforfreedom@live.com
sure thing... working on a private forum-members only, with a few others, underground, using a few strategies while in the left--to fight the banality of evil, because thats what it is, no doubt about it,
but I will tell you, this is a warfare that we haven't Even seen the tip of the iceberg yet.
And I do believe, this is going to be an age, where humanity is tested like never before, the West especially,
it won't be so much about right and left,
but about, evil verses good. I think its going to really get to that primitive instinct because what we are faced with is so much worse than Stalinism ever was...and on a global scale.
again, that email
wamiforfreedom@live.com
and to close,
two things...
doesn't matter the numbers, if we are a minority,
to that I say, "Remember the Alamo"
and
something Arendt said that I will never forget,
what the strength of totalitarianism is or has is also the germ of their destruction. [something like that] and with that in mind and heart, I say,
Lets Roll. ;)
found something for all of you--this also backs up a bit about what I was saying about fighting the propaganda via the right wing,
read through this entire thing--and when you get to near the bottom, Read the literature that the MIM/Avakian used at this Berkely event to silence the speaker,
what Avakian said about women/westerners and the porn/etc., is true, yes,
and its the Same argument that was used in Fanon's "Algeria Unveiled", which sums it up to this,
westerners only want freedom to exploit.
So any attempts to confront is twisted as right wing 'reactionary'...just as it was at this event --
the next Islmofascism--week,
needs new strategy, [won't share online, only via email]
see http://www.zombietime.com/darwish_berkeley/
read the posters, those that you can see, especially the ones confronting 'reactionary right',
thats what is killing the movement against the Islamist-Left alliance.
but there IS a way to rip it to shreds, exposing the hypocrites they truly are...
if you wonder why I am willing to expose them, and still I am left, yes,
because they betray Every principle, for liberation for workers and for women and for people--they are the scum and I do mean the scum,
they are No more anti-capitalist than Reagan was...nor are they anti-imperialist either. they are far, far worse than all the European and American Imperialism put together...far worse.
That, and they are the Worst traitors to the Poor--world wide,
do some research on Avakian--he's nothing but a leftist ideology Pimp, at least Mao in the beginning of his days did care, about the peasantry [if you've ever studied Mao],
this Shit called the left today, they not only don't care about the peasantry--hell, they just want to screw them over, pimp them out, and enslave them while they bask in their palaces of luxury.
At least, under capitalism there is So hope of mobility, not under these despots though...they'll hand over their infant daughters to be raped by Islamists if it meant them getting a throne to plot their imperialist asses on,
and I am very militant in saying so. I know, I worked in it, believed in it for so long...economically I still do, though there are massive flaws, serious flaws in that whole ideology [but there is flaws in all of them],
but I believed because I hate oppression, oppression that is unnecessary and deliberate for someone's gain...and These, these mother fuckers,
[forgive the french] will wipe out humanity if it gets them the power they want, there Is no empathy in them,
its all talk. and bottom line, the flaw, main one, is this,
it was Never a movement By the oppressed for the oppressed--it was by the those moving up to the 'upper' but who couldn't quite get there, who saw how they could use the biological fodder, the poor, to prop them up to the top of the pyramid, and that pretty well sums it up.
And today, they are using the Islamists to do it...what you see in Sudan,
is Exactly, what they'll do to the working and poor and broken world wide--they don't care, there Is no humanity to them,
humans are just 'numbers and material things' those cogs, worse than what it is in capitalist production--those forces to be moved which ever way they desire, so they can set theirselves up as
gods.
Natasha
Director of WAMI
Natasha,
I'm trying to get my head around the idea that you are a pro-gun leftist.
What's up with that?
By the way, I've always thought the Left were a more natural enemy of Islam, because the left (to my mind) stands for
1) Gay rights
2) Women's rights
3) freedom of speech/conscience
But, the left has been way behind in opposing Sharia law.
Sharia is against the above three points, and as such it is anti-human rights, and it ought to be declared sedition by every reasonable country in the world.
And yet, the left has gone on protecting Muslims as noble savages and innocent brown people, which is the most racist argument anyone can make (in the UK, they refer to Muslims as Asians).
Islam is not a race. It is a political/religious ideology. To equate it with race is really pretty much the equivalent of equating watermelon-eating and laziness with race.
Pastorius,
when it comes to their rhetoric on freedom of speech and conscience, most leftists haven't really lived up to it very well, with support for things like the fairness doctrine and hate speech laws.
Yes, I make the mistake of going by what they say and not what they do.
where to begin,
because it would take a book length to explain, but to put it in a brief term,
the left today, is the outcome of years of combined indoctrination through various influences, added to historical shifts within the left, especially in America.
Used to be, in the pre-WWI era, the left in America was divided between Bolshevik and more of a libertarian model, similar to the divisions between the Marxists and Christian democrats or social democrats in Europe. America didn't go through the whole national vs international shift like Europe did [eg Luxembourg-Lenin, etc] nor the on-land nationalist wars, not Inside America...though there was events in America that did impact the left here it wasn't in the same way as in Europe...then comes WWI-WWII, etc., decolonization, and pretty much US foreign policy picked up from there,
but, the left in America during WWII I believe or maybe prior did split away from Stalinism [except for a small faction] and so for a while the left in America was somewhat moderate, maybe, maybe not the term I'm looking for but it was anti-Statist...
again, there was that small faction but overall it was a liberal leftism, then comes the sixties, with all the turmoil and it was in the 70s actually that the left parties [far left] picked up speed again, remnants of the 60s left movements, i.e. Black Panthers, Puerto Rican Lords, Feminist movement, SDS [Avakian], but one thing that differs there from the left in developing countries [60s-70s) was the class and academic element,
similar to lets say,France but France has always had somewhat of a class consciousness, even today, in America, there is little 'true' class consciousness, so they rely on
externals, external movements, and That was easy to do, the sixties and the issues of race and self-determination of peoples, and I believe it was that time that the leftists forces from other nations saw their opportunity and took advantage of it.
Also, during this whole time, that small remnant I was telling you about, was also working in alliance with these other factions [externals] so, I don't think this is like some new wave,
I think from what historical party archives I was able to read [before they took them down] that this was in process the entire time, it never died out, it just receded until the right time,
now something too I've wondered about, though I haven't done the research, is the left parties today, are very linked to what is termed as 'red brown' shirts, which is a combination of neo-Nazi ideology mixed with Leninism, this I believe really picked up speed after the fall of Soviet bloc countries and the German unification--reactions to the globalization/EU and all the economic pressures From the US to cut welfare-social nets, etc., I know in Russia this was the case,
and then, in America, the Neo-liberal left or what they term as 'progressives' picked up on that, that was that whole 'globalization' polemic that was pretty big there for a while, in 90s, then the Bosnian war, during that time the far left was receding again [but always watching] while the progressives became more empathetic to the global state of workers, etc., but during this whole time the far left has always had their hand in the jar so to speak,
especially in feminism, if you do studies on feminist theory you can Really see how these forces have been in effect. And Horowitz is right in that so much of it was through Academia, see what they say today about Islamists using liberalism to get in the door, well, in fact, the far left has been doing the same but for way longer,
remember too, the Islamists were anti-left for very long time, why Reagan for example, worked with the Islamists to curb none other than the Red Scare, same with the utilizing the fascist [and Nazi} elements in South America.
[and it was also a lot to do with the support of the Dutch in South Africa]
So all this time, there is this infiltration, but its a twisted left ideology, and why Islam [this is what I saw] is a powerful influence to gain sympathy,
in the left here in the West, is Not because the left is anti-capitalist as they so claim, thats a crock, believe me, its just good PR use of Leninist terms,
no, the reason they have the power of influence and sympathy is because Islam appeals to what?
MALE HEDONISM
seriously, think about it...the left has always appealed to the liberal ideas [those anti-conservative forces] in the west, by none other than focusing on hedonist desires, they couldn't attack freedom by saying, do away with private property, even within the worker's movements that was always an obstacle in the west [American], in Europe, for example, those ideologies worked, to a Point--something interesting that oh, whats her name, Angelica Balabanoff (sic) said about the weak character of left in Europe [Italy more so] was that once worker's got what they wanted that was that...it was a worker's cliche type of 'self interest' left movement, hence, why socialism in Europe today is somewhat in the pockets of the rich,
but in America, that didn't go over well, it never has, there wasn't the 'class consciousness' Except, Except within race [and I'll get to that here in bit],
so, the one means they did have, or at Least I think, was manuervering (sic) social and liberal values, especially those that are derived around 'self gratification', focus on the Threat to those by conservatives to be taken away,
and you have a sympathetic camp. And I did see this in the left--believe it or not, they Reject much of Lenin's and Mao's anti-liberalism, in America because it doesn't appeal to Westerners, especially the MEN in the far left/left--because there has always been that western patriarchy/sexism that in the left has never truly been done away with, why there was also that split between feminists and far left in the late 70s/80s,
but then, comes in the race nationalism. Because in race, there Was that class consciousness, not just race consciousness but class, and that is another area where they work to form this solidarity between race here, and the oppression of races by yes,
America and Israel--the oppressed Arabs/Muslims.
So, they appeal to the hedonism in left [that whole communal women pass her around to all de' brothers crap thing they got going on--far left men in America love that shit, so do the men in Southern Cone]and That, that is also a strong lure,
as to why left men are sympathetic to the Islamists, hey, what better way to have your cake and eat it too--it appeals to that whole liberal 'male' hedonism--now, women, women who prop that shit up,
stupidity, seriously stupidity, no other way to explain that. But there was a way the far left/left accomplished this too,
and it Was through the whole GLBT rights because,
of how they focus on 'degenderizing' society [good example of how this plays out, read Shalumuth Firestone, her Dialectics of Sex] which, was taking Marx/Engels theory on the woman or family question [it was Marx's daughter who actually wrote the Woman Question, probably because of the shit she say her poor mother go through] but anyway,
and perfecting it in a way in which it was a perfect tool by the Marxists [and influenced by] [that was also one of the big flaws in Marxism--but in That epoch, it wasn't just Marxism, it was in Freud and Bertrand Russel, another movement against the puritanical Victorianism etc of that age] but
rather than take it in historical perspective, the left takes those historical movements and they take them Out of context and they use them, to their advantage.
But too, there is on the other side, a Backlash within the left, not in society only but in the left because the neo-liberalism was creating a standstill of sorts, so, basically it was going back and forth between right leftism and then liberal leftism,
I think over the past ten years, there has been this frustration in the left, from what I saw in the parties and the appeal to the Islamists, esp after 9-11, became stronger, but Really they started utilizing the solidarity with within I would say the past five years.
Because within the left there is this rising rejection of liberal or neo-liberal ideas when it comes to the social aspects, i.e., women's rights, GLBT rights, etc., oh, there is still that liberal segment but if you really look there is a backlash, because now with the infiltration and demographics change of 'race',
more and more class issues are coming up, and this is Exactly what the far left has been waiting for. But believe me when I say, they are not truly for class liberation, thats just the 'pawn pr' that they use,
another reason too is the mix, going back between the Leninist/Nazi ideologies that are, if you break down all the left parties in developing countries, are based around racialism and self-determination via nation-state, against none other than western imperialism and western hegemony.
Now one thing to consider, too, and its something I'm reading now about the rise of fascism in Europe, and there is as you probably know a real ignorance about the 'defining of fascism' because everyone links fascism to Hitler,
well, thats partly true, but fascism was in fact around at least in theory before Hitler and it was Mussolini that was the father of fascism in the sense that it became a Force, like never before,
but there too, with the Industrial base in Germany, rose the dynamic fascism, where as in Italy it was the 'clerical' [conservative], the Falange party even more so, and of course those nations that sort of rode on the back of Hitler--but What is chilling about going back and breaking this down is that,
today we have the same process but its technical rather than industrial and its a left-wing fascism in contrast to right...and the liturgy/clerical, is none other than Islam.
Remember too, America is still a young country [though I haven't got to really pull that into the study yet], but politically speaking development wise [dialectics/changes, etc],
its almost like we are at that same place Germany was, or Europe really, not in its entirity (sic) no, but socially, that social conscious And development wise, that including bursting at the seams economically, or those cracks, but in a sort of reverse way,
remember then it was the fear of communism that gave way to the rise/support of conservatives to the fascists, esp among the middle classes,
today its a bit different...but the similarities, are just too vast, however, that aside, What makes it so dangerous today, is that this isn't just a threat to America, or a change within America but its going on in Europe, in Australia, in parts of Asia,
AND its not just going on in developed nation states but in underdeveloped and while the far left may be steering it to some degree--I think its more the opposite,
I think its the Islamists that are steering the left, in more ways than maybe the left is aware of, I don't know for sure, but I have considered that possibility--
I can't speak for the far left-left in Europe with the detail I can about the American left, though I know there are similarities because of the alliances between socialist-communists in Europe and America, there is strong disagreements too, but then, that too, over the past five years there has been this huge divide and political purging of those who they deem as Internationalists, its hard to explain,
but like, some are going more Stalinists-or Maoists combined and they are the ones that are more apt to be in strong alliance with Hezbollah and Hamas, etc., I think the only reason the progressives are lumped in with that somewhat is due to the whole utopic kumbayah bullshit, seriously, IF there was ever a movement that is so easily duped and led to their doom, they are it,
and don't think the left-Islamists don't know it, they do, just give them all the drugs and sex they want and the 'illusions of left liberalism' and they'll lie down and spread like butter,
seriously they are that fricking lead thought wise by their organs, and not the brain one.
Honestly the far left/left who really Do see the shit and I mean shit literally that is taking over the left are the older generation...most of them are in their 70s, and well, I think most have just sort of resigned, and I blame this on the 'technical' age because used to,
those in the left spent hours upon hours reading and were very disciplined, not anymore,
look, I mean you have bimbos now that bear their breasts for anti-war, to scream for peace for nations that jail women for exposing a strand of hair, I mean there is just no words that I can think to describe the level of debasement and stupidity there,
and Thats what I mean by the using hedonism to appeal to the liberal left here, and the hard core left and yes, I do blame it on the 60s culture, a lot of it stems from that. That, and the materialist culture we live in--self gratification at whatever costs,
and the far left knows it, Avakian has written on it, I think he called it the 'activist cult', if memory serves me right...
and I can promise you, if they succeed, they'll do away with the liberal left, the ones who are loudest in support of them, first, Just like they did,
in Iran. They run their asses over, and proof of this, look at Obama's campaign,
look at the turn now to the conservative bent in the left--because it Is related to the conservative/clerical fascism in Islam. That discipline---which yes, is in Leninism too, for none other than crushing the state/middle classes,
they can't rely on the poor and the liberals to do so in America, they aren't disciplined enough--but they can do it through the rise in Islam and the racial groups that are more towards the conservative or more apt to be allied with the liturgy type of leftism, just like Ortega and Chavez,
but there is one group, demographically speaking that they have taken for granted, and that is the true working class/working poor, who though they may lean to conservatism, they don't lean towards That type of conservatism, and its those that you see that are in the No Obama camp, dems but dems who do see the left influence and power play within Obama's political forces.
What is worrisome is how too, the Islamists are also working with the neo-Nazi groups such as StormFront, one example, so I don't know, not sure if that might work to their advantage or blow up--and I would bet this is why too there is the scapegoat once more, on the Jews, got a problem blame the Jews,
the books/theses on the New Left anti-Semitism is dead on right, I mean, they got that down pat, and I saw it, in fact I saw it when I first got in the left parties, first they covered up as just anti-Israel, within past five years, the old Stalinist Jew haters started getting bolder and bolder and now get this, one of the more influential ones, is a Gay man,
no kidding, and one of the more prominent feminist boards, is heavily influenced by a woman that is Extremely anti-semitic, I had a few battles with her in my time...
btw it was those little battles too that I started putting things together, eventually they came out on an all out attack and called me a racist bigot, LOL,
and at that time I was just speaking against Islam [the party's love affair with Hezbollah] on women's rights--but I found out a hell of a lot more,
and for a while I confronted them, time and time again, and they did boot me out, not like, physically but I'm sure if they could have, oh they would have, long ago,
but they did it in a way that was very sinister but clever--and thats how, as unknowledgeable (sic) I was on how party polemic works, how I figured out a lot of how they work,
then I went back and read All I could find on the socialists and communists that Stalin purged and why, read what ever I could find, and sure enough, it started making more and more sense, because thats another thing--many westerners don't know, is Stalin and Mao, didn't just kill 'class enemies' but they killed any who were going to 'expose' them for what they were,
its also no coincidence that the fav term right now in the left to silence their enemies is using the 'Trostkiest' label [though, lol, ironically its also Trotskiest that are in the internationalist camps--that 'multi-culturalism'] that you are also being, or we are being confronted with.
I saw it because before I became a leftist I was in the right wing--and I read, tons on human rights by those who were imprisoned in those countries, so I had an awareness, put it that way but it Wasn't until I was literally singled out and persecuted for none other than standing up against the onslaught of a misogyny and tolerance for Islam that I would really see it, just how sinister and evil,
and I stood back, and started investigating, here and there, putting things together. And I still do--
but I'm going to tell you something, and you can agree or not, but its NOT just the left--there is a huge part of the right, but for different motives, that are doing the same shit with the embracing of the Islamists, there truly is two sides of fascism working, not just one,
and putting it simply its like this huge contest of who can gain the hegemony of a one world type of control over resources--including labor, so like its not just the bad leftists, its a huge part of but its so much more and basically the people, or citizens are being sold to the highest bidder,
sold and steered to support and prop up, and this isn't like conspiracy or out of the la la land here, all one has to do is look at the effects of global consumerism on the world to get a picture, doesn't take a genius to figure it out,
one side is using economics and the other ideology, but both are utilizing the Islamists in certain ways,
and on that aspect Chomsky is right about the neo-liberal globalization support of Islam--he's right on that part,
and the transnationals. But the danger in America is the far left/left utilizing the Islamists here, I'm far more concerned with that than I am with the capitalist hegemony with development in Middle East, because I look at it this way,
even if, lets say one wants to struggle and change the economic strata, one can't do that if they are living under brutal totalitarian theocracy--look at every single Islamist country,
they are extremely hierarchal and oppressive economically, its medieval serfdom, no two ways about it. The communist workers party in Iran has been fighting for years, look where thats gone?
Not only that, they don't even have solidarity here with the leftists here, oh, a mention here and there, but, its drivel, if one was to have absolutely no knowledge whatsoever and walk into a left party, all they would hear is that Palestine is like the only oppressed place in the world, that an the evil empire of US in Iraq,
bring up Iran's worker's strikes or Egypt's political crack down and they'll go, yea we know, uh huh but once we get rid of the imperialist that will dissipate',
or they use the strawman arguement, which is their favorite. Because bottom line, they don't give a rats ass about the workers or the poor--its around racialism, nationalism and Islamism.
Any autonomous effort by workers or women or GLBT [because thats changing in left too, just like their views on feminism are] is looked down upon, as bourgeoisie and petite bourgeoisie influences...
but they Love to use the propaganda to appeal to them, but the more and more they build around racialism and nationalism, the less they have need for that propaganda and it then becomes more in line with Islamist ideology.
BTW, its not just how they use Islamism to appeal to the hedonismt male majority in these parties, they did the same exact shit with the LDS compounds too, and they use that whole freedom of religion argument and self-determination argument to ward off any criticisms,
and this is how they are doing this within the anarchist left too. The women in these groups if not willing to adhere to the Islamist misogynist culture become more and more disenfranchised,
and they separate from, but they are impotent, I think--Except, for the women and men who are disillusioned over the Hilary debacle--the left fucked up there, in a big way,
but its good. Because people are Seeing it, they are seeing and connecting the dots--but there is still this huge segment even within that group, that disassociates from Any criticism or bringing up the ties of Obama to the Black Liberation ideology that is tied with Islam,
which is why, again, a third camp is needed, because when criticism is only from the right, immediately that mind is closed off--and tragically on some points, for damn good reason,
but too, it might have to be through the right to be able to get the exposure to the 'disinformation' out there,
the left is really powerful, I know, I've been confronting it for some time, and let me tell you they are Swift to shut down Any, Any exposure, they are That indoctrinated, it is no underestimation of how the cult of de-individualization of the thought process has worked in this nation, they are extremely skilled at the art of group think.
the Minute you bring something to prove their fallacy--they discredit you. Especially if you are a woman,
and then those in the left who aren't in agreement with the bedding with Islam--are either too old or too resigned or not willing to hash it out, but are not willing either to throw their lot in with the right.
And the right has this tendency too to stay stuck in this time frame, far right especially, I think, which works to just reinforce the power of manipulation over minds of youth especially in the left.
by youth I'm referring to 18-30 group.
the very ones the right looks down on, is the very ones they need to be pulling in...put it that way. OR, establish a strong third camp not affiliated with the alternative camps already in place, not that there won't be disagreements, there will, obviously,
but in confronting Islam and the soft jihad in this country and in Europe, we can't afford to be polarized, because when they are cutting off our heads so to speak they won't bother to differentiate who is right who is left,
they won't give a damn. We're all the same to them...
as for guns, shit, I think now is the time to start stockpiling...why the UK is fucked, seriously,
and yes, its always been fascism that wants to disarm citizens, the ruling elites--disarm the citizens then you can start digging the mass graves...
you know if you ever read "Kolyma Tales", Shalamov, read how it was the use of American bulldozers that built those graves out of granite and ice. Interesting parallel there, but guns alone won't do it [ever watch the Military Channel, lol], not if there isn't warfare strategies, something...but,
if the mind control seriously isn't nipped, it won't matter, hell the duped will just lay down, all it will take is pacify them enough--if they can lure in the most hard core of leftists with promises of unlimited little girls, those permissions that are contrary to the traditional left, hey,
they can lure almost any who live for the moment--as Fromm said himself, those who live for the means for the means, not ends, its just the pleasure means that drives them. Like waving heroin in front of an addict--won't matter if they are holding chains and a gauntlet in the other hand, that addict is going to seek to fill their hunger and desire,
and that is Exactly how the left/far left and the Islamists are doing it now.
If you think this is all nuts, just go out to some of the left-Islamist boards and read how the women are using taquiyya to lure these horny stupid men in,
or how the men are luring these women in, or how these so called 'Muslim feminists' are luring the western feminists in with their 'we aren't sexualized like you are and the anti-porn platform'
oh,the Left is good, let me tell you, they are good--but they aren't Perfect, by No means. And they Don't like it,
when you really expose the betrayals to unions and workers in every single one of the Islamic countries--
using their own damn logic, to expose their lies.
Forget reaching the upper strata--they are too busy in bed with the money-whores, seriously,
its the worker right next to you, that whole segment--the hurting and disenfranchised and invisible, those who Brazille said 'we don't need you go home',
they will, they will listen. Especially when the truth about the treatment of workers including those outsourced jobs, are done, by the very ones who say they are working to liberate them--
Chicago would be Perfect, to floor with the truth. Start there, and hit every single worker's metropolis in this country...
think some long indepth worker analysis in Islam is going to be posted on WAMI--feel free to use it,
there is already a couple on there, see the posts with the videos of Dubai, the homeless in America,
I'll add some more this week. Getting them into zines and in Spanish too, would be very very wise...
Natasha
Director of WAMI
http://www.minutodigital.com/actualidad2/2008/07/10/mientras-los-musulmanes-nos-recomiendan-tolerancia-ellos-alardean-de-parir-hijos-para-la-yihad/
Natasha said:
"or how the men are luring these women in, or how these so called 'Muslim feminists' are luring the western feminists in with their 'we aren't sexualized like you"
Qur'an 33:59 "Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and all Muslim women to draw cloaks and veils all over their bodies (screening themselves completely except for one or two eyes to see the way). That will be better."
24th surah: Qur'an 24:34 "Force not your slave-girls to whoredom (prostitution) if they desire chastity, that you may seek enjoyment of this life. But if anyone forces them, then after such compulsion, Allah is oft-forgiving."
Bukhari:V3B48N826 "The Prophet said, 'Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?' The women said, 'Yes.' He said, 'This is because of the deficiency of a woman's mind.'"
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Feedback_Muslim_Woman_Defends_Oppression.Islam
FGM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/05/FGC_Types.jpg
Post a Comment