Just What Is This Domestic Sharia Law The Archbishop and The Lord Chief Justice Are So Hot For?

The Archcunthip and The Lord Chief Pussois of England are both in agreement, we ought to entertain the idea of using Sharia law for domestic situations, so Muslims can feel as if they are serving Allah and Mammon too.

But, what is domestic Sharia law? Cal Thomas explains:

So this is how it ends: not with a bang, but a whimper.

The most senior
judge in England has declared that Islamic legal principles in Sharia law may be
used within Muslim communities in Britain to settle marital arguments and
regulate finance.

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said, "Those entering
into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a
law other than English law."

In his speech at an East London mosque,
Lord Phillips said Muslims in Britain could use Islamic legal principles as long
as punishments - and divorce rulings - comply with English law.

Sharia
law does not comply with English law. It is a law unto itself.

And so
the English, who gave us the Magna Carta in 1215, William Blackstone and the
foundation of American law, are slowly succumbing to the dictates of intolerant
Islam and sowing seeds of their own destruction.

The Iranian and Kurdish
Women's Rights Organization (IKWRO), an umbrella group of activists who work in
Muslim countries to liberate women from the dark side of this oppressive force,
according to Womensphere.wordpress.com, identifies Sharia family law as the
fundamental basis for discrimination against women in the Muslim world,
including communities in the United Kingdom.

Here are just some of the
"benefits" British Muslim women can look forward to if Sharia law replaces
English law:

n The Muslim woman cannot marry without parental approval,
worsening the problem of forced marriage.

n Marriages can be conducted
without the presence of a bride, as long as the guardian consents, creating a
climate for underage and early marriage.

n Muslim women may only marry
Muslim men.

It gets worse.

n A Muslim man can divorce his wife
by repudiating her.

n They have no obligation to support a former wife,
or her children after the divorce.

n Women are prohibited from divorcing
husbands without his consent.

n Abuse is not grounds for a woman to end
a marriage.

n In matters of inheritance, sons are entitled to twice as
much of an estate as daughters.

n Divorced women must remain single. If
they remarry, they can lose custody of their children. There is no similar
requirement for a man.

n Child custody often reverts to the father at a
preset age, even if the father has been abusive.

It is impossible to
reconcile this antiquated "law" with English law, so what could Lord Phillips
mean when he says that Sharia law can be used in Muslim communities as long as
such laws comply with English law?

This will mean English law must
become subordinate to Sharia law.

This is Dhimmitude, an Islamic system
of religious apartheid begun in the 7th century that forces all other religions
and cultures to accept an inferior status once Muslims become the majority.


Go read the whole thing.