Attacks on Pope Benedict XVI's decision to lift the excommunication of a Holocaust denier escalated Monday, with one theologian calling on him to step down as the head of the Roman Catholic Church.Criticism following the pope's January 24 announcement has been particularly cutting in Germany, where denying the Holocaust is a crime punishable with a jail sentence.
"If the pope wants to do some good for the Church, he should leave his job," eminent liberal Catholic theologian Hermann Haering told the German daily Tageszeitung.
"That would not be a scandal, a bishop has to relinquish his position at 75 years, a cardinal loses his rights at 80 years," he said. Pope Benedict is 81.
Meanwhile, a senior Vatican official acknowledged the Vatican administration may have made "management errors" with the decision to lift excommunication against four bishops, including Richard Williamson, whose comments sparked the controversy.
"I observe the debate with great concern. There were misunderstandings and management errors in the Curia," said Cardinal Walter Kasper, who is in charge of the Vatican department that deals with Jewish relations.
"The Pope wanted to open the debate because he wanted unity inside and outside," the German cardinal toldVatican Radio.
He also noted that "these bishops are still suspended."
An international uproar followed the decision to rehabilitate Williamson, an English bishop who has dismissed as "lies" historical evidence that six million Jews were gassed by the Nazis during World War II. Jews and Catholics alike have produced widespread criticism.
"A pardon that tastes of poison," wrote Franco Garelli, an expert in religious history, in Italy's daily La Stampa Monday.
"The trouble caused by this complicated affair is evident not only outside the Church but within it," wrote the academic, who spoke of the "profound discomfort stirred up by the lifting of the excommunication in numerous Catholic circles."
Back in Germany, high-ranking Catholic officials said the pope risked losing vital support.
"There is obviously a loss of confidence" in the pope and "rehabilitating a denier is always a bad idea," the bishop of Hamburg, Werner Thissen, told the daily Hamburger Abendblatt on Monday.
The bishop of Rottenburg-Stuttgart, Gebhard Furst, meanwhile spoke of his "uncertainty, incomprehension and deception" in the national Bild.
In France, home to Europe's largest Jewish population, chief rabbi Gilles Bernheim denounced Williamson's remarks as "despicable" in an interview with Le Monde.
Williamson claimed that only between 200,000 and 300,000 Jews died before and during World War II, and none in the gas chambers.
French government spokesman Luc Chatel called Williamson's remarks "unacceptable, abject and intolerable."
In Austria, where Pope Benedict last week named a controversial ultra-conservative priest as auxiliary bishop in Linz, criticism also came from within the Church.
Vienna's cardinal and archbishop, Christoph Schoenborn, on Sunday lashed out at the decision to bring Williamson back into the fold, saying that "he who denies the Holocaust cannot be rehabilitated within the Church."
Belgian daily La Libre Belgique slammed the Vatican's "blindness" and "deafness," drawing links between Williamson and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
"Apparently no one can make the Iranian president and his henchman see reason" when they deny the "truth" of the Holocaust, and it is the same with the "bishop recently anointed by the highest authority of the Catholic Church," it said.
For the pope, the "blunder is extraordinary, especially given that his willingness for a dialogue with Judaism is indisputable," said French daily Liberation.
Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel is also none too happy with Pope Benedict:
Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, today became the first world leader to condemn Pope Benedict XVI over his rehabilitation of an ultra-conservative British bishop who denies that Jews died in the Holocaust.
Ms Merkel called on the German Pope to make a "very clear" rejection of the views of Bishop Richard Williamson, who has denied that six million Jews were gassed in Nazi concentration camps. In a highly unusual rebuke to the pontiff, she said that she did not believe there had been "sufficient" clarification.
"This should not be allowed to pass without consequences," Ms Merkel, the daughter of a Lutheran pastor, said. "This is not just a matter, in my opinion, for the Christian, Catholic and Jewish communities in Germany. The Pope and the Vatican should clarify unambiguously that there can be no denial and that there must be positive relations with the Jewish community overall."
Additionally, a Cardinal and several German Bishops are expressing a lack of confidence in the Pope:
Cardinal Walter Kasper, head of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, which covers relations with Judaism, conceded yesterday that the episode had been mishandled. His remarks follow expressions of dismay by German bishops over a "loss of faith in the Pope" as a result of the annulment of the excommunications of Bishop Williamson and three other ultra-traditionalist bishops.
Cardinal Kasper said that he had followed the row "with great preoccupation". He did not attack the Pope directly – an unthinkable act for a cardinal – but blamed the row on "errors of management" by the Curia (the Vatican hierarchy) and on "a lack of communication" inside the Vatican.
He said that there had been too little internal discussion of the Pope's reinstatement of the arch-conservative followers of the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, and a failure to foresee the row which followed.
The cardinal, who is also German, has admitted that he was not consulted over the rehabilitations. There is a growing view in Rome that Pope Benedict works closely with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith – which he himself ran for two decades – but neither seeks nor is offered advice which might head off public relations disasters.
Cardinal Kasper told Vatican Radio: "There have certainly been errors in the way the Curia handled this – I want to say this explicitly." He said that the reinstatement of the four bishops was "far from complete" and there were "many open questions between us and them", including inter-faith dialogue and ecumenism.
The Pope has made what I believe to be a grave error. The rehabilitated Priest belongs to the Society of St. Pius X, an ultraconservative Catholic order which believes Jews are "Christ-killers".
2 "I will make you into a great nation
and I will bless you;
I will make your name great,
and you will be a blessing.3 I will bless those who bless you,
and whoever curses you I will curse;
and all peoples on earth
will be blessed through you."
Romans 11:
1I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. 2God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew.
11Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious. 12But if their transgression means riches for the world, and their loss means riches for the Gentiles, how much greater riches will their fullness bring!
13I am talking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles, I make much of my ministry 14in the hope that I may somehow arouse my own people to envy and save some of them. 15For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead? 16If the part of the dough offered as firstfruits is holy, then the whole batch is holy; if the root is holy, so are the branches.
17If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18do not boast over those branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19You will say then, "Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in." 20Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but be afraid. 21For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.
22Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. 23And if they do not persist in unbelief, they will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24After all, if you were cut out of an olive tree that is wild by nature, and contrary to nature were grafted into a cultivated olive tree, how much more readily will these, the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree!
All Israel Will Be Saved
25I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. 26And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:
"The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27And this is[f] my covenant with them
when I take away their sins."[g]28As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God's mercy to you. 32For God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
6 comments:
Thank you, Pastorius, for this article, and especially for the scripture quotations at the end. These verses have been seemingly ignored by Orthodox, Catholic and many Protestant churches from the 2nd century onward till today, or else explained away, using the "authority of the Church" to reinterpret them to fit into "replacement theology" schemes, which is no theology at all.
The Church may have decided what writings were to be included in the Christian Bible, but that decision was made long ago, and not by authority from above (exercised in their own right by church hierarchs) but rather by acknowledgment by the hierarchy of those writings already regarded as scripture by the Christian PEOPLE. In other words, yes, the Church (the people of God) by their use of these writings gathered them into a corpus now called the Bible, but their selection was only ratified and proclaimed by the hierarchs of those days, confirming what the people of God believed. There is no other way to defend historic Christian orthodoxy, except by this. The Orthodox Church itself has handed down the teaching of the apostles, that it is the people, not the leaders, who guard the truth of the Christian faith in all its aspects.
Modern day church leaders, Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant, often take the credit for deciding what the Bible is and what it means, and to dissent from them is viewed at best with suspicion and at worst punished by disciplinary measures. But the Word of God is clear and consistent: Israel is God's hereditary people. The rest of us have been grafted into them, and through one single Jew, namely Jesus, we have come into part of their inheritance—salvation—for as Jesus Himself said to the woman of Samaria, "Salvation is of the Jews." As for the other promises made to them by YHWH the God of Israel, we are fortunate to be living in the age when many of them are being fulfilled.
As many of you know, I am a Greek Orthodox Christian.
http://cost-of-discipleship.blogspot.com/2007/10/orthodox-church-and-israel.html
Thank you for the comment. You and I are in agreement.
This St. Pius order is an abomination.
Pastorius, respectfully, I have to fundamentally disagree with you and let me expalin to you why.
First of all the Pope is not going to "resign" and if you had a sense of Papal history from Peter until John Paul II, you would comprehend that that is not how things work.
Especially because some insignificant left wing theologian believes he should.
I will concede to you that this matter was handled horribly and I am still at a lost as to the manner it was undertaken without regard to His Holiness trip to Israel in May and to the LEGITIMATE fracture it created amongst our Jewish brothers and sisters.
I am also on record, if you read my blog, as going after Bishop Martino whose rhetoric vis a vis the IDF I found quite disturbing. (who later freaked out when a bunch of Jihadist took over Milan square, ironically)
John Paul II did his level best to bring the Vatican as close as possible and to attempt to heal the rifts between the Holy See and Israel, and Jews in general.
As to the Society of St Pius what you fail to grasp was that John Paul II excommunicated them initially due to their rejecting of the Vatican II reforms, in which all strains of anti-Semitism and any liturgical bashing of Jews was prohibited.
Josef Ratzinger was actually the person who carried it out, as he was the Papal liason sent by John Paul to warn Levebre and his followers....
Bishop Williamson is a vile man who not only engages in odious counter factual re-writing of hisotry but also is one of these Moore types, in terms of 9/11.
Now there in lies the essense of this matter. It is not just the four Bishops, there are also tens of thousands of Lefevbre supporters in France which are not in accordance with Rome.
The ONLY way whatsoever for Williamson or any St.Pius follower to be in full "communion" with the Vatican is to NOW accept, wholeheartedly, Vatican II.
Hence, they would have to forswear every last vestige of anti-Semitic thought or behavior, as well as other liturgical and issues of canon law, in terms of rites, etc.
Again, I reiterate and the Pope has stated as have the USCCB nationally that any person who attempts to diminishes the Shoah is in violation of the most core principles of the church and in violation of Vatican II, which commenced this whole matter.
Regards.
Hi Carlos,
You said: Again, I reiterate and the Pope has stated as have the USCCB nationally that any person who attempts to diminishes the Shoah is in violation of the most core principles of the church and in violation of Vatican II, which commenced this whole matter.
I said: Could you provide a link? I have not seen that.
Just for the record, I did not suggest the Pope resign.
I did, however, write that I think this is a grave error on the part of the Pope.
Here's my personal website:
www.cuanas.blogspot.com
Have a look at the sidebar. You will find that First Things magazine is there, as is the Ratzinger Fan Club.
I am not a Catholic Basher.
What I am saying, here, is basically the same thing you are saying in your last paragraph.
Ok, I will provide the links on your personal site, thanks for the response.
If you take a look at my sidebar too, you will see I am HUGE suppporter of the IDF and I love the state of Israel!
Best Regards.
Thanks.
I would rather find good things to say about the Pope, as he is a man I have admired deeply to now.
By the way, I own and have read many of his books. I find him to be among the most profound thinkers in history.
Post a Comment