Monday, March 02, 2009

Why not a SINGLE "progressive" understood Mr. Limbaugh, including Rahm Emanuel

Many of those who consider themselves conservative look at Mr. Obama's statements, budget ideas and actions, appointments, and speeches since being president and see someone who is a thorough and firm believer in creating a more if not mostly socialist America.

Equal outcome dictated from outside.

EJ Dionne only this morning...
"The central issue in American politics now is whether the country should reverse a three-decade long trend of rising inequality in incomes and wealth."
"Do they believe that a fairer distribution of capitalism's bounty is essential to repairing a sick economy?"
"I'm just trying to spread the wealth around" he told Joe.

Those who believe in what the founding fathers brought to life, IN THE WAY THEY MEANT IT, see all this and shudder.

They see a socialist nation being born in order to 'make the trains run on time' and in the hope of beefing up the 401k's, and have a national health plan.

We see Obama say he believes in the 2nd Amendment and then wink at an Illinois requirement to have gun owners carry $1 million in insurance..and insurance offered by NO ONE. We see Obama tell us he supports Israel then appoint a bigot as chair of the National Intelligence Council. And then we hear him say he supports free enterprise.

WE DON'T WANT TO LIVE IN THIS KIND OF NATION SO WE WISH OBAMA'S IDEOLOGY TO FAIL TO ACHIEVE ANYTHING.

If George Bush has proposed and passed a civilian 'service' corps which followed his ideology, religious ideas, or executive power conclusions in time of war, would anyone think twice about the legitimacy of Al Franken braying that he wanted Bush to be a failure?

No comments: