The Pope And The Jews

I am becoming more and more convinced that Pope Benedict is being set up, by his some of his advisors within the Vatican, to make outlandish moves and statements which would depict him as an anti-Semite.

I have studied this Pope's works for years now, and I am convinced that he among the least anti-Semitic Christian thinkers I have ever encountered. In fact, I do believe it is clear that he is the best friends the Jews have ever had who has occupied a position of high authority within the Catholic Church. And, he is among the leading advocates, in all of Christendom, for the idea that Jews are "brothers in the Faith." 

And yet, we find the Pope supporting the Durban II Conference, and we find his spokespeople making statements such as,

"The Holy See is distancing itself from the criticisms of some Western countries," Asia News, a Catholic news agency that is part of the missionary arm of the Vatican, said of Benedict's words.

And, just a few weeks back, we found the Pope "rehabilitating" a nominally-Catholic, Holocaust-denying "Cardinal" who claimed the Nazis did not employ gas chambers to kill Jews.

After an outcry lasting well over a week, the Vatican admitted their mistake, and claimed a P.R. nightmare had been the result of the fact that "a lack of communication within the Vatican."

You can say that again.

But, the question is, how does such a failure to communicate occur? How is it that this Pope is being fed information which leads him to statements and actions which contradict his real positions, which are clearly laid out in his Academic works?

I think a little bit of history on Pope Benedict/Cardinal Ratzinger is needed here, so that everyone can understand why I say this Pope is among the Jews best friends in all of Christendom. 

Here is an article I wrote in 2005, just after Cardinal Ratzinger was declared to be the new Pope:

Pope Benedict XVI and The Jews

Much has been said in the past 24 about the New Pope and his relationship to the Jews. The media is making a big deal out of the fact that he was a member of the Hitler Youth. The truth is, all German children were enrolled in the Hitler Youth.The Popes father was an ACTIVE ANTI-NAZI, which caused him to have to pack up and move on several occasions. The Popes whole family was anti-Nazi.

The media is bringing up this Hitler Youth stuff because the media does not like the fact that the Pope is a Christian. They would rather that he be a mushy New Age hypocrite like themselves.

Too bad for the media.

The Pope, Mr. Ratzinger is actually one of the best Christian friends the Jews have ever had. I am surprised to find how much his ideas dovetail with my very own.

Here is an excerpt from a very long paper, entitledThe Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures In The Christian Bible, much of it written by The Pope, Cardinal Ratzinger himself:


Personally, Paul continued to be proud of his Jewish origin (Rm 11:1). Referring to the time preceding his conversion, he says: 

“I advanced in Judaism beyond many among my people of the same age, for I was far more zealous for the traditions of my ancestors” (Ga 1:14). Having become an apostle of Christ, he says of his adversaries: “Are they Hebrews? So am I. Are they Israelites? So am I. Are they descendants of Abraham? So am I” (2 Co 11:22). Still, he can relativise all these advantages by saying: “These I have come to regard as loss because of Christ” (Ph 3:7).

Nonetheless, he continues to think and reason like a Jew. His thought is visibly permeated by Jewish ideas. In his writings, as was mentioned above, we find not only continual references to the Old Testament, but many traces of Jewish traditions as well. Furthermore, Paul often uses rabbinic techniques of exegesis and argumentation (cf. I. D. 3, no. 14).

Paul's ties to Judaism are also seen in his moral teaching. In spite of his opposition to the pretentions of those who kept the Law, he himself includes a precept of the Law, Lv 19:18 (“You shall love your neighbour as yourself”) to sum up the whole of the moral life. 332 Summing up the Law in one precept is typically Jewish, as the well-known anecdote about Rabbi Hillel and Rabbi Shammai, Jesus' contemporaries, demonstrates. 333

The resistance mounted by the majority of Jews to the Christian preaching produced in Paul's heart “great sorrow and unceasing anguish” (Rm 9:2), clear evidence of his great affection for them. He said that he himself was willing to accept on their behalf the greatest and most inconceivable sacrifice, to be branded “accursed”, separated from Christ (9:3). His afflictions and suffering forced him to search for a solution: in three lengthy chapters (Rm 9-11), he goes to the heart of the problem, or rather the mystery, of Israel's place in God's plan, in the light of Christ and of the Scriptures, without giving up until he is able to conclude: “and so all Israel will be saved” (Rm 11:26). 

These three chapters in the Letter to the Romans constitute the most profound reflection in the whole of the New Testament on Jews who do not believe in Jesus. Paul expressed there his most mature reflections.

The solution he proposed is based on the Scriptures which, in certain places, promised salvation only to a “remnant” of Israel. 334 In this phase of salvation history then, there is only a “remnant” of Israelites who believe in Christ Jesus, but this situation is not definitive. Paul observes that, from now on, the presence of the “remnant” proves that God has not “rejected his people” (11:1). This people continues to be “holy”, that is, in close relationship with God. It is holy because it comes from a holy root, the ancestors, and because their “first fruits” have been blessed (11:16). 

Paul does not make it clear whether by “first fruits” he means Israel's ancestors, or the “remnant” sanctified by faith and baptism. He exploits the agricultural metaphor of the tree when he speaks of branches being cut off and grafted (11:17-24). It is understood that the cut off branches are Israelites who have refused to believe in Christ Jesus and that those grafted on are Gentile Christians. To these — as we have already noted — Paul preaches humility: “It is not you that support the root, but the root that supports you” (11:18). 

To the branches that have been cut off, Paul opens up a positive perspective: “God has the power to graft them on again” (11:23); this would be easier than in the case of the Gentiles, since it is “their own olive tree” (11:24). In the final analysis, God's plan for Israel is entirely positive: “their stumbling means riches for the world”, “how much more will their full inclusion mean?” (11:12). They are assured of a covenant of mercy by God (11:27,31).

At the time I wrote that article, back in 2005, I said of the new Pope,

I believe the choice of Cardinal Ratzinger as Pope could very well be a hinge upon which history will turn. He is exactly the Pope needed to counter the problems our world is facing today.

I still believe that to this day. Unfortunately, the hinge of history seems to be turning on some sort of deceit within the Vatican. A "lack of communication" as the spokesperson euphemistically put it.

Frankly, I am concerned that the level of deceit, evidenced by these failures to communcate, is evidence of a possible wider conspiracy to disempower the Pope and his agenda. If I were the Pope, I'd hire a food-taster.