JOE BIDEN:
Obama Considering ‘Executive Order’ to Deal With Guns
Vice President Joe Biden revealed that President Barack Obama might use an executive order to deal with guns. “The president is going to act,” said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. “There are executives orders, there’s executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet. But we’re compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required.”Biden said that this is a moral issue and that “it’s critically important that we act.”Biden talked also about taking responsible action. “As the president said, if you’re actions result in only saving one life, they’re worth taking. But I’m convinced we can affect the well-being of millions of Americans and take thousands of people out of harm’s way if we act responsibly.”Biden, as he himself noted, helped write the Brady bill.Eric Holder was scheduled to be at the meeting that’s currently taking place at the White House.
I believe the following phrase is in the oath the man took once….
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
It is my HOPE that Barack Obama DOES take action by executive fiat, and that like the Schecter Bros vs USA (NRA), and the FDR actions to place 13 SCOTUS justices, it forms the basis of the BORDER of his disgusting excesses, futile ideas on fossil fuels, contrary to national security, and rouses the Republicans to understand PRECISELY who they are and what they are compelled to do.
We have a 2nd amendment for PRECISELY the reason that such a man as Obama thinks he can act in this way in order to promote the progressive idea, which in his mind is more important to our future than any outdated document or idea set by a crew of old, rich, white landowners.
We have a second amendment PRECISELY because Obama probably identifies my sentiment as SEDITION.
6 comments:
Exactly right Epa, great post.
Yep. Very well put.
Great post, Epa.
Thanks.
The Constitutional Crises will be nothing to the Social Crisis Obama will face should he try to forcibly disarm 80,000,000 gun owners. Even worse if he does so unilaterally.
Not too long ago even here many thouht that was absurd. Not so much anymore.
So there will absolutely be defiance if not outright rebellion (defending one's property -- in this case guns -- from confiscation vs. openly showing up in D.C. (or wherever) saying ENOUGH! and punctuating it one way or another.
Of course there is no way we could win something like that, not by arms anyway.
Because THE REAT IRONY IS THAT WHATEVER ARMS A U.S. CIITZEN HAS THE GOVERNMENT HAS THEM THREE OR FOUR GENERATIONS BETTER.
The defense against which is precisely why Msrs. Jefferson and Adams and Madison and Franklin et. al. conceived the Second Amendment.
And so, in a situation like that, people like Midnight Rider or Rumcrook or Ted Nugent would likely end up either dead or in jail.
This is all just way too fucking convenient. The question needs to seriously be asked whether the POS Aurora shooter might not have had some type of quiet "handlers" like the Bali terrorists had.
I have a very strong feeling that if retroactive seizures are contemplated a lot of weapons will be reported as stolen.
This is just ANOTHER WAY... JUST ANOTHER WAY.. of creating a Kafka-esque society in which we are all criminals in fear of some govt action against us,... EVERYTHING NOT COMPULSORY WILL BE FORBIDDEN. This is the progressive dream ..since THEY KNOW BEST.
This nation is divided as NEVER before since 1860.
I was just telling Midnight Rider, yesterday in a phone conversation, that we are moving to the edge of becoming the "Fear Society" that Natan Sharansky spoke of in The Case for Democracy".
Obama is threatening the citizens of the United States. Either we fight back and we continue to have a Free Society, or we cower and begin to live under some degree of Authoritarianism.
Post a Comment