These 11 States Now Have More People On Welfare Than Are Employed, NINE of them have majority Democrat party affiliation
From Will at THE OTHER NEWS:
These 11 States Now Have More People On Welfare Than Are Employed, NINE of them have majority Democrat party affiliation.(PA)."Death Spiral," proclaims a chain mail that an Austin reader brought to our attention Dec. 21, 2012.
That’s the headline on a U.S. map with 11 states highlighted and accompanying text that says, "These 11 states now have more people on welfare than they do employed."
We found the same message and map posted on blogs, discussion groups and Facebook. Even Texas’ attorney general tweeted about it Jan. 7.
The “death spiral” phrase and the 11 highlighted states — Alabama, California, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, Ohio and South Carolina — appear in a Nov. 25, 2012, Forbes column, and the map appears onscreen during a Nov. 29 Fox Business “Varney and Co.” report on the commentary piece.
But the criteria used to identify Forbes’ “death spiral” states were not as simple as welfare andemployment.
Forbes investment strategies editor Bill Baldwin wrote that those 11 states were “at high risk of a fiscal tailspin” because they had many people who received money from the government but maintained policies that “chase out the private-sector jobs that support all that spending.”
Baldwin reached his conclusion by comparing “makers” and “takers.” For this purpose, he wrote, “a taker is someone who draws money from the government, as an employee, pensioner or welfare recipient. A maker is someone gainfully employed in the private sector.” Then he factored in an index that downgrades states for “large debts, an uncompetitive business climate, weakhome prices and bad trends in employment.”
The results, he said, showed states that were “danger spots for investors.”Hmmmm......What interested me in that post was the Party affiliation by state so here you Have it:
Party affiliation by state: Democrat - Republican Percentage
Alabama, 37% - 50%
California, 47% - 34%
Hawaii, 52% - 28%
Illinois, 49% - 35%
Kentucky, 47% - 40%
Maine, 45% - 39%
Mississippi, 43% - 43%
New Mexico, 43% - 39%
New York, 51% - 31%
Ohio 44% - 40%
South Carolina 37% - 47%
But the criteria used to identify Forbes’ “death spiral” states were not as simple as welfare andemployment.
Forbes investment strategies editor Bill Baldwin wrote that those 11 states were “at high risk of a fiscal tailspin” because they had many people who received money from the government but maintained policies that “chase out the private-sector jobs that support all that spending.”
Baldwin reached his conclusion by comparing “makers” and “takers.” For this purpose, he wrote, “a taker is someone who draws money from the government, as an employee, pensioner or welfare recipient. A maker is someone gainfully employed in the private sector.” Then he factored in an index that downgrades states for “large debts, an uncompetitive business climate, weakhome prices and bad trends in employment.”
The results, he said, showed states that were “danger spots for investors.”Hmmmm......What interested me in that post was the Party affiliation by state so here you Have it:
Party affiliation by state: Democrat - Republican Percentage
Alabama, 37% - 50%
California, 47% - 34%
Hawaii, 52% - 28%
Illinois, 49% - 35%
Kentucky, 47% - 40%
Maine, 45% - 39%
Mississippi, 43% - 43%
New Mexico, 43% - 39%
New York, 51% - 31%
Ohio 44% - 40%
South Carolina 37% - 47%
1 comment:
Hawaii???
Post a Comment