Thursday, February 28, 2013

Not Cynical Enough Still, Mr. Woodward


This blog and several others have noted at the very least that the current occupant at 1600 PA Ave seems a very self arrogating, self lauding and ‘entitled’ individual whose every dog ate my homework statement  (the latest being the DHS/ICE brushing away of the hand) exudes both arrogance and a lack of responsibility.
The first part of that, arrogance, makes compulsory the denigration NOT of criticism, but of the critic, and finally when that is not available, COERCION.
Bob Woodward, who has already eviscerated several administrations, and did bring down an admin which had captured 97% of the electoral vote, and 61% of the popular vote in 1972, has proven that if he does have a political leaning, it doesn’t influence him much compared to the pursuit of finding some level of objective reality.
This pursuit has now found the Obama administration for what it is. What this blog and many others have been saying is OBVIOUS.
Woodward had correctly placed the responsibility for the sequestration CHARADE where it belongs, and then expressed his disgust that this clear strategy aimed at 2014 as a priority, would result in something such as a single aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.
Sere HERE, and HERE.
Yet Mr. Woodward STILL exhibits naivety of this man Obama.
Digging into one of his famous folders, Woodward said the tirade was followed by a page-long email from the aide, one of the four or five administration officials most closely involved in the fiscal negotiations with the Hill. “I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today,” the official typed. “You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”

Woodward repeated the last sentence, making clear he saw it as a veiled threat. “ ‘You’ll regret.’ Come on,” he said. “I think if Obama himself saw the way they’re dealing with some of this, he would say, ‘Whoa, we don’t tell any reporter ‘you’re going to regret challenging us.’ ”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/woodward-at-war-88212.html#ixzz2MBmHnPqn
That IS Barack Obama telling you.
This administration is bent on 2014 being one major step towards the permanent dismemberment of Conservative opposition as a challenging political force. ONE MAJOR STEP. The sequestration and those associated details like the aircraft carrier are just that, DETAILS to be ignored next to the clear BOLSHEVIK PRIORITY.
2014 being one major step towards the permanent dismemberment of Conservative opposition as a challenging political force.
These people are not communists in the way we have conceived of them, but they are undoubtedly Bolshevik in their strategy to dominate.
Place the template of that theory on every administration action, Mr. Woodward, and you will see WHO is making a really NOT SO VEILED threat. Your access will be ZERO. Plan on it. And I would make sure your accountant is really sharp.
Those people in the White House and at the newly named OFA are sure they have the MESSAGE and the WAY, and you Mr. Woodward have become one of the Kerenskyite fools.
History is replete with many revisionist theories about bad men really being simply ignorant of the evil done in their name.
I’m not sure Obama is a bad guy, but bad is being done in his name, and I believe by his indication.
Certainly Obama IS THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
So Mr. Woodward, while you have correctly identified the evil being done, the threats being made, and evinced the disgust which becomes compulsory, it’s time to  pin the tail on the, errrrr…… DONKEY.
The threat is Mr. Obama’s.
Even after he says the dog ate his homework.
Again.

2 comments:

Pastorius said...

Word.

midnight rider said...

And how best we poor peasants fight these Neo-Bolsheviks?

(Epa --Tar

Pasto -- Pitchforks

AoW -- Rope

MR - Torches

WC -- Rail

Will -- Feathers)