Hmmm..... Mr. Seidman. You may be
right. I mean, why should we be burdened with rules and laws that were written by
old men hundreds of years ago that have little understanding of the problems we
face today. In fact, why should we be burdened with laws created by an old man
a few thousand years ago .
Why the Ten Commandments.
If we chuck the Constitution based on what Mr. Siedman says, we should
chuck the Ten Commandments, too. Think about it. Any true blue Progressive who
say we have different problems than societies have had in the past, can see
that the Ten Commandments are archaic and have little place in our society
I mean, what’s this about not converting they neighbors
goods. If someone has more than me then
that’s not fair.
If I want to have an abortion any time at any week, that’s good by me.
And what’s this about there being only one God. The God of the
Bible. Phooey. Gaia is my god and
environmentalism is my religion. And let’s not even discuss the graven image
thing. Let’s not go there.
And if I want to take the Lord’s name in vain, how can I be
a successful standup comic?
And if I want to shop on Sunday, the stores better damn be
Thou shall not commit adultery. Yeah that’s a good one. What
century are you living in? Don’t restrict my promiscuity.
If I want to bad mouth someone – hey – that’s free speech -
even if it’s a lie.
And as far as stealing goes – don’t do it. It’s the
government’s job to re-distribute the wealth.
So you see, if the Constitution is an archaic and irrelevant
document, why do we need the Ten Commandments?