Friday, December 02, 2016

Threatening Letters Mailed To Mosques


This story is just starting to come out. I'm not sure how many Mosques have received such letters.

The letter says that the mothers of Muslims are "whores", and the fathers are "dogs".

I have not heard many "Infidels" use such words of late. But Muslims do use such words in their attacks on Jews and Christians.

Hmm.

Could these letters be fake? Or is there some crazed Muslim-hater out there who is doing this?

Could be either one.

I like what Epa has to say about it:
Here's what we can say for sure ... whoever wrote that is a sick fuck who has no idea what the fuck America is. NO MATTER WHO WROTE THAT.
What do you think?





17 comments:

thedeplorableraven said...

Fake letter through and through.

"mothers are whores, fathers are dogs".

Talk about "cleansing" and references to what Hitler did to the Jews.

I'm willing to bet this was written by a muzzie.

No question about it.

thedeplorableraven said...

Oh lets not forget the most obvious one:

"Children of Satan."

Probably some imam wrote this.

Pastorius said...

I don't remember the last time I heard someone, who was not from an Honor/Shame culture , refer to another human being as a "dog".

Pastorius said...

I should say,

I don't remember the last time I heard A MAN, who was not from an Honor/Shame culture , refer to another human group of people as "dogs".

Anonymous said...

I call bologna.

Anonymous said...

One more attempt to discredit Trump voters. Either from the DNC or CAIR. I would put money on it.

thelastenglishprince said...

Adding to the discussion, the forensic is one of writing coming out of a Muslim mind. Perhaps more telling then the reference to dogs (dog saliva is unclean and dogs may only be used for the hunt) the reference to Hitler and the Jews, is the use of the term day of reckoning.

The doctrine of the day of judgment is part of the package from the Madani revelations, along with the doctrine of Satan, etc.

There is a reason the police are calling this "hate incitement" and not hate crime. It is NOT a hate crime. It is a false flag operation.

We give ourselves away as soon as we open our mouths. This writing came from a Muslim hand.

Redneck Texan said...

Sorry about the quality of my handwriting.

Epaminondas said...

LOL! You waycist

Pastorius said...

Heh.

Redneck Texan said...

Epa, please pardon my ignorance on the subject matter. I've never really researched too deeply the Jewish / Nazi history.

I know that many Jews emigrated from Germany prior to Hitler's accession, but were they ever offered the opportunity to safely self-emigrate after he came to power?

Because that's what this letter seems to be suggesting. That Muslims would be well advised to deport themselves. And being a lifelong Waycist ;-), if this letter were to encourage any Muslims to seriously consider voluntary repatriation ...... I'd contribute to their travel expenses.

Redneck Texan said...

...... as far as having "no idea what the fuck America is."

..... I am reminded of how the Mormons decided it was in their best interests to relocate from the Midwest to Utah. They had actually congregated in several Midwestern counties and established electoral control (re:Dearborn).

And then the People, god-fearing salt of Earth patriot Americans in the adjacent counties, banded together, outside the constraints of local law enforcement or the Constitution, chased the Mormons out the country.

..... not to mention what the new Americans did to the native Americans.

...... or to the Mexicans that claimed the land my ranch now sets on.

...... or to the Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor.

..... my only point here being, while the slave holding misogynist Founding Fathers may have written down some words about equality and religious freedom, the Street Americans have always lived by a much more waycist code.

.... to ignore that America is to miss the forest for the trees.

Redneck Texan said...

..... as Hillary can attest.

Pastorius said...

RT,
I don't think Epa was picking on you. If he was angry, he'd just call you a RACIST, not a waycist.

Redneck Texan said...

I never interpreted has "Waycist" as anything other than a friendly acknowledgement of my original comment in this thread.

..... and none of my subsequent comments were intended to anger him as well.

Its all good as far as I'm concerned.

..... I am awaiting his reply to my Jewish emigration question though.

Redneck Texan said...

Went ahead and half-assed researched it myself.

From a pro-Jewish ? source.

Once in power, Hitler moved quickly to end German democracy. He convinced his cabinet to invoke emergency clauses of the constitution that permitted the suspension of individual freedoms of press, speech, and assembly. Special security forces — the Gestapo, the Storm Troopers (SA), and the SS — murdered or arrested leaders of opposition political parties (Communists, socialists, and liberals). The Enabling Act of March 23, 1933 — forced through the Reichstag already purged of many political opponents –gave dictatorial powers to Hitler.

Also in 1933, the Nazis began to put into practice their racial ideology. The Nazis believed that the Germans were “racially superior” and that there was a struggle for survival between them and inferior races. They saw Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and the handicapped as a serious biological threat to the purity of the “German (Aryan) Race,” what they called the master race.

Jews, who numbered about 525,000 in Germany (less than one percent of the total population in 1933) were the principal target of Nazi hatred. The Nazis identified Jews as a race and defined this race as “inferior.” They also spewed hate-mongering propaganda that unfairly blamed Jews for Germany’s economic depression and the country’s defeat in World War I (1914-1918).

In 1933, new German laws forced Jews out of their civil service jobs, university and law court positions, and other areas of public life. In April 1933, laws proclaimed at Nuremberg made Jews second-class citizens. These Nuremberg Laws defined Jews, not by their religion or by how they wanted to identify themselves, but by the religious affiliation of their grandparents. Between 1937 and 1939, new anti-Jewish regulations segregated Jews further and made daily life very difficult for them. Jews could not attend public schools; go to theaters, cinema, or vacation resorts; or reside or even walk in certain sections of German cities.

Also between 1937 and 1939, Jews increasingly were forced from Germany’s economic life. The Nazis either seized Jewish businesses and properties outright or forced Jews to sell them at bargain prices. In November 1938, the Nazis organized a riot (pogrom), known as Kristallnacht (the “Night of Broken Glass”). This attack against German and Austrian Jews included the physical destruction of synagogues and Jewish-owned stores, the arrest of Jewish men, the vandalization of homes, and the murder of individuals.


Hmm.

I'm not trying to justify anything. Just genuinely curious why more Jews didn't get to fuck out of there early on. And how that may be relevant to our Muslim problem here.

....... I dont really know what victory in the counter-jihad would look like to you Pasto.

A permanent change of Islamic hearts that leads to living in peaceful harmony with millions of Muslims here and billions abroad?

...... I've always kinda ruled that possibility out.

....... I only see a viable solution that leads to mass deportation, preferably voluntary and violence free, but by consensus force if required, of the Muslims that have migrated to the west over the past 50 years. And a more collectively punitive military response in the Islamic world for attacks against us after that.

Basically as punitive strategy that encourages continued Muslim on Muslim violence over there, to keep them in a weaken state, while eliminating as much as possible their ability to attack us here. I want to make the cost for attacking us here high enough that they would police their communities for their own sake.

I dont see any hope for a long term solution that would be overtly waycist, unconstitutional, and a violation of Geneva conventions.

I do see them eventually giving us ample justification for such a response. With perhaps not universal approval here, but firm majority approval.

Redneck Texan said...

EDIT:

I dont see any hope for a long term solution that would NOT be overtly waycist, unconstitutional, and a violation of Geneva conventions.