Biden against 9-11 victims

Daniel Greenfield reports faux-president Joe Biden's staff are opposing 9-11 victims in court, all for the sake of giving the Taliban money they don't deserve:

White House Democrats have a history of fighting against terror victims suing Islamic terrorists. The Obama administration battled American terror victims suing the PLO. In 2015, after they won a $218 million judgement against the terror group, Blinken, then only a deputy secretary of state, intervened claiming that the lawsuit threatened “several decades of US foreign policy.”

But now Biden is fighting 9/11 victims on behalf of the Taliban. At stake are billions being held by the Afghan central bank fund in the United States.

A decade ago, 9/11 families sued the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Iran. The court found that the Islamic terrorists were responsible and a judgement of $6 billion was handed down.

The verdict was described as "symbolic" at the time. CBS News commented that "it would be near impossible to collect any damages, especially from the Taliban or al Qaeda." But that was before Biden turned over Afghanistan to the Taliban. Since Afghanistan has assets in this country, including $7 billion in bank funds, it’s now entirely possible to collect that money.

Or it would be if the guy who let the Taliban take over wasn’t also in the White House.

Biden officially announced that he was splitting the $7 billion between the families of the victims and a "trust fund" to provide "humanitarian aid" for the people of Afghanistan.

But that was just another one of his many lies and double crosses involving Afghanistan.

The $3.5 billion was placed in a separate trust that would be "separate and distinct" from the around $800 million the Biden administration has already spent on aid to Afghanistan. Officials admitted that the money could actually be used for matters other than "humanitarian aid".

The media headlined it as, "Biden frees frozen Afghan billions for relief, 9/11 victims". But a Biden official admitted that it was done to stop 9/11 families from getting access to the money.

It goes without saying that to undermine victims and relatives of such a barbaric act as the attack on the WTC only compounds the evils of the Democrats. Now, thousands of 9-11 victims have been desecrated as the result of far-left ideologies.

Democrats Propose New Way Forward Act: Would Allow Felony Convicts To Become Citizens And More

Have you heard of the New Way Forward Act?

You should probably watch this: pic.twitter.com/whtEYTeyNV

— Benny (@bennyjohnson) February 7, 2020

A Graphic Of 1000 Words

Hat tip to Franco Aragosta:

As Saul Alinsky said in his Rules for Radicals:

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."

It's Time To Impeach Adam Schiff

For this little stunt upon opening the impeachment inquire at the House Intelligence Committee:

For three years now, Democrats have threatened to impeach President Trump for not taking seriously enough the efforts by foreign governments to meddle in our 2016 elections.

Then evidence surfaces revealing Mr. Trump’s earnest effort to confront a foreign government and pressure them to investigate and turn over information about their meddling in the 2016 elections.

Now Democrats want to impeach Mr. Trump for that.

In other words, Democrats today want to impeach Mr. Trump for doing what they say they have wanted him to do for three years.

[...]

The whole thing quickly devolved into another comical farce when Rep. Adam B. Schiff, California Democrat and “intelligence” chairman, kicked off the hearing by setting aside the just-released transcript of the telephone call between Mr. Trump and the president of Ukraine. He chose instead to read an entirely made up, fraudulent and fabricated transcript of a call that never occurred....

Read the rest HERE.

Video:

YouTube blurb for the above:

...Adam Schiff misled congress and the American people today when he read his own version of the transcript filled with lies and mischaracterizations of President Trump's conversation. Democrats are now openly lying about what Trump said in an effort to get him impeached.

Note that "journalist" Peter Wehner has alluded to Schiff's words as the truth.

Trump Omitted From The 2020 Ballot?

[source]

From Trump could be left off some states’ ballots in 2020 if these bills become law (Washington Post, March 20, 2019, emphases mine):

In refusing to release his tax returns, President Trump bucked decades of tradition and set off a Democrat hunt to obtain them. Now several statehouses are looking at making their release a condition of the 2020 presidential election: Show us your tax returns, or you can’t be on the ballot.

Eighteen states have considered legislation this year that would require presidential and vice presidential candidates to post their tax returns to appear on the ballot during a primary or general election, according to data from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Proponents of the bills, such as the one passed by the Washington state Senate this week, say they are aimed at increasing transparency and returning to the “norm” of candidates releasing their financial records. But Democratic lawmakers behind the some of the legislation have admitted they are also very much about Trump, which raises legal and political questions about how far states can — or should — go in regulating who appears on their ballot, especially in a hyperpartisan climate.

In addition to Washington, several other states, including California, Hawaii and New Jersey are considering similar bills....

[...]

...[N]ot all politicians think this kind of legislation is a good idea. In 2017, then-New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie vetoed one bill that made it to his desk, calling it “politics at its worst.” Former California governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, did the same when California’s legislature passed similar measure.

“First, it may not be constitutional,” Brown wrote in his decision. “Second, it sets a ‘slippery slope’ precedent. Today we require tax returns, but what would be next? Five years of health records? A certified birth certificate? High school report cards? And will these requirements vary depending on which political party is in power?”...

Read the rest HERE.

The phrase by hook or by crook comes to mind. So does the word unhinged.

Related? Elizabeth Warren wants to kill the electoral college.

San Fran Nan Spills The Beans

From the mouth of the enemy:

This is what every Liberal (in Canada and USA) politician does knowing this can only be done when you have a complicit biased liberal Media in Liberal’s corner.

Thank you @NancyPelosi for explaining what you did to #Kavanagh @POTUS and every opponent pic.twitter.com/7hoL9WO5aK

— Manny_Ottawa (@manny_ottawa) October 6, 2018

What The Left Most Dreads Right Now

From the Guardian (UK), dated May 31, 2018:

Liberals' worst nightmare: a second supreme court pick for Trump

...Any vacancy prior to 2020 would almost certainly be filled by Trump, and a rules change adopted by Republicans during the Gorsuch nomination fight enabled the Senate to confirm supreme court justices with a simple majority vote....

Read it all HERE.

My commentary:

The Left will stop at nothing — NOTHING! — to get President Trump out of the Oval Office!

Fasten your seat belts. The propaganda war to destroy the Trump Administration is going to get worse and worse.

Make no mistake: the very survival of our republic founded upon the principles of federalism is at stake.

This battle isn't about issues ranging from women’s reproductive health to LGBT rights, as mentioned in the Guardian article. Those mentions are scare tactics to divert attention from what is really at stake.

A Referendum On Trump?

According to the Chicago Tribune and numerous other Democratic Party mouthpieces, the June 20, 2017 special election for the 6th District of the United States House of Representatives, was a referendum on Trump.

Well, Democratic Party candidate Jon Osoff lost to Republican Party candidate Karen Handel.

According to the New Yorker, this election result is a reality check for the Democrats.

Who will be the Trump-Like Disrupters of the Democrat Party?

From The Examiner:

Nothing impacts a community more than being written off by a political party, except being taken for granted by a political party.Both parties have done that over and over again in this country. No majority is ever permanent, yet realignments are rare. When they do happen they are a prolonged process.Currently it is the Democrats who are feeling the burden of both writing off and taking for granted voters. Oh, Democrats in Washington and New York might not be ready to admit that — they are still too busy debating the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election.But smart strategists who are on the ground and have seen Democratic elected office holders sizably shrink over the past eight years sure know it. Their livelihoods depend on it.

Democratic hopefuls will not sit around too long before a major disrupter or disrupters surface to radical shift the Democratic Party away from their far left agenda. 

As I stated in a previous post, the far Left leadership will have their last hurrah and the final nail in their coffin in the 2018 mid-terms. 

Now the questions is....Who out their in the hinterland will be the disruptors that bring the Democratic Party back to it's traditional liberal roots?

Anyone have any suggestions?

The Parties are Dead – Long Live the New Political Parties

It’s customary in the start of a new year for prognosticators to give their predictions of the year – or even years – to follow.

So here’s mine.

Both political parties – the donkeys and elephants – are DEAD. The Democrats are dead but their leadership refuses to acknowledge it. Their canned response is always, “Americans wants what we are offering – i.e., the message – it’s just that we have our ‘messaging’ wrong.”

AKA – the definition of insanity – when proven wrong redouble your efforts.

The only ‘Americans’ that want what they are shoveling is the little strips of blue ‘paradise’ on each coast and a hand full of Leftist controlled urban areas scattered around the country. The donkey crowd will have to change their message if they are to remain a viable national party.

The Republican Party is no better. If Trump succeeds in what he has promised, the RINO will become an endangered species. Trump is no Republican. He ran as an Independent candidate within the Republican Party. He did what every critic of third-party candidates has tried to do over the last several decades with only Ross Perot making a go at it. (The Green Party, the Looserterian Party, etc, etc.)

Trump, if he is successful, will absolutely change the face of the Republican Party for Trump is what Newt Gingrich has said. Trump is NOT a conservative or a Republican but an alley to both. Trump has – I hope – created a Party based on common sense – not ideology.

So what’s my prediction?

If the DNC retains their current leadership of Socialists and Marxists, the 2020 midterms will be the final nail in the Democratic Socialist Party’s coffin. Remember the DNC Presidential debate when the three candidates were on stage and the host asked,” How many of you are socialists?” and they all raised their hands.

So what’s to come for the donkeys. When the last remnants of the Democrat Socialist Party are swept out the door in 2020, a new group of real liberals – I say real liberals like Truman, Kennedy and Johnson -  will begin to take back their Party.

Watch for them. We have no idea who they are but you will begin to see them raise their heads over next two years.

They will take a page from Trump’s book and these new young Turks will create a Populist version of the what Trump has done to the Republican Party to re-claim the mantel of what liberals claim to be for - the working man – the unknown man.

When that happens, it will raise a very interesting prospect for 2024. A Trumped Republican Party of common sense competing with a Democratic Liberal Party of common sense for the attention and votes the American people.

We may see again a true two-party form of government that seeks compromise and not confrontation.

It will be the reawaking of America and the start of a Second American Century.

Tim Kaine's Comments About Islamic Treatment Of Women

Well, more specifically, about women in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Rwanda as compared to women in the United States:

Vice presidential candidate Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said Tuesday [August 17, 2016] that the United States has made it difficult for women to be elected to higher office, and argued that America ranks behind Iraq, Afghanistan and Rwanda in this area.

"It took 144 years before women even got the right to vote in this country," Kaine said at a campaign rally in Fayetteville, N.C. "What were we thinking when we said equality mattered, but no. One hundred and forty four years. It took us that long to say in 1920, to say women get a right to vote. And now we're 96 years later and we have just nominated a woman. We know we haven't had a woman president....

Read the rest HERE.

Beyond the labels I've added to this post, I have no further comment.

What is there to say?

The New Democratic Party

From Rush today:

What the Democratic Party is today.

Black Lives Matter, New Black Panthers, Occupy Wall Street, stripping God from their party platform, transgender bathroom advocates, pro-death panels, baby butchers!
A candidate who violated the Espionage Act thousands of times, sexual predators, pedophiles, illegals, Sharia Muslims, Marxists.  That's the Democrat Party today.  That's who votes for them; that's who the Democrats defend.

He nails it.

Ain't It The Truth?

In response to Silverfiddle's comment at my blog yesterday:

We've got to give El Donaldo some credit. He's forcing the political whores to lay their cards on the table.

DC is spilling over with cheap pimps, and the dirty little secret being revealed is that they know no ideology...

Let us count the ways and hope that we don't exceed the allowable bandwidth.

(hat tip to Skip V. Patel's Twitter page)

The Two-Party System

Particularly appropriate after what the Congress critters did last night with the passage of the omnibus bill (hat tip to Political Tea Leaves):

We no longer have a representative government.

Dave Brat's Opponent

We all know that Dr. David Brat (Ph.D. in Economics and a Constitutionalist) defeated incumbent Eric Cantor in Tuesday's GOP primary here in Virginia.

Here is the man that Dave Brat will be running against in November, Jack Trammell, an associate professor of sociology specializing in disability issues:

“Jack Trammell has hundreds of stories, poems and articles to his credit, as well as two dozen book credits. He lives in central Virginia on a small farm with his family, and currently has a vampire novel in the works. He is an award winning author, teacher, researcher, and disability advocate.”

Most of Trammell’s tomes sound pretty boring and historical in nature. There’s Appalachian Dreams, Math in History and Down on the Chickahominy: The Life and Times of a Vanishing Virginia River.

But if his 2001 book Sarah’s Last Secret is in any way based in reality, we’re in for a seriously exciting, high drama race....

Both Brat and Trammell are professors at Randolph-Macon College. Of all places! Most of my students won't even consider Randolph-Macon as an option for college. The college is not even on their lists!  Just sayin'.

Detroit Goes Belly Up

With a hat tip to Western Hero:


The future of more big cities in America? Likely.

Obama Campaing Ad Equates Voting For Obama With Having Sex

(with a hat tip to Reliapundit of THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS)

The devolving exhibited by the Democratic Party during this election season continues. Trashy, to say the least:


Wow. Just wow.

Have some people lost their minds, or what?

Check out this recent trash talking on the part of Barack Hussein Obama. Civil discourse, huh?  Pffffft.

By way of interest, please compare the above video to one of Vladimir Putin's recent political ads (hat tip to The Right Scoop), and note the parallels:


Some reading from the UK's Mail Online: "Barack Obama, the 2008 'hopemonger', has become the fearmonger-in-chief of the 2012 election campaign."  It's worth your time to read the Mail Online's October 25, 2012 article indicating that Obama really is America's Demagogue-in-Chief. Can today's American electorate recognize such tactics and repudiate them? We'll find out on November 6.

The DNC And Israel

First, a reminder of the second change to the 2012 DNC Party Platform if you haven't already seen the video:


So, why did DNC change the platform the first time so as to remove certain language about Israel?  From time marker 0:26-0:60, the CNN video below offers a clue (hat tip to Will of MFS - The Other News):


There is more to the story of the language in the 2012 DNC Party Platform. From Debbie of Right Truth:

After DNC delegates denying God (and Israel) three times, they still got their way in the end. Breitbart reports that full pro-Israel language from the 2008 platform has not been and will not be restored...

Check out the entirety of Debbie's post HERE.  Worth your time if you are interested in this topic.

Stunning Display of Myopia From the DNC

But, they don't get it.

The Truth is,

We Do Not Belong To The Government,

The Government Belongs To We The People